-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
>> Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
>> abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
>> implemented via LDAP if you so choose. The mapping betwe
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:02, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
>>> Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
>>> abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
>>> implemented via LDAP if you so choose. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2010 01:24 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
>> http://wiki.rediris.es/gtschema/Portada
>
> I'm getting a "Mediawiki internal error" there, does it work for you?
Works for me right now (Wed Jul 7 13:29:29 CEST 2010)
- --
Victoriano Giralt
Systems Man
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
Victoriano Giralt articulated:
> On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
> >> Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
> >> abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
> >> implemented via LDAP if you
Hi all
status=bounced unknown user:
since MANY days I google, trial and error, read howtos
and .postfix.org-howto's/readme's
and still get above error
any precise help would be most welcome
setup:
postfix version 2.6.1 + dovecot on opensuse 11.2
2 MX servers
1 running since 4 years on postfix/
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:40:55 +0800
Hans Neukomm articulated:
> below > postconf -n
>
> alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
> biff = no
> broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 14:40 CEST,
Hans Neukomm wrote:
> status=bounced unknown user:
>
> since MANY days I google, trial and error, read howtos
> and .postfix.org-howto's/readme's
> and still get above error
[...]
> 1 mailbox = 1 mail user = NON-unix user = hans (me)
Local domai
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST,
Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
> Victoriano Giralt articulated:
>
> > I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions for mail routing
> > and is in use in several Universities and Higher Ed institutions:
> > http://www.redir
I am finally putting together a test mail server (something I wish I
had when putting together the first mail server, but lack of hardware
due to lack of funding flow limited that). But now I have another
machine.
But I am still seeing all the issues I had before with Ubuntu. At
first I tried to
On 07/07/2010 05:25 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I am finally putting together a test mail server (something I wish I
had when putting together the first mail server, but lack of hardware
due to lack of funding flow limited that). But now I have another
machine.
But I am still seeing all the issues I
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
> I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
> postfix properly.
Name it.
> Anything that interferes with that is not worth the effort.
Which do you use?
> Regardless, no specific distribution will be supported
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:09 -0400, Jerry wrote:
> Why are you setting configuration parameters to their default setting?
> It doesn't serve any purpose that I am aware of.
NOE does it do any harm I am aware of
but it may be bad style - I am aware of that
but to know which lines are obsolete might
Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
When mail arrives to the mail server,
I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
a footer in the body like below, before dropping/relaying it to the
mailbox local or remote.
all attachments >1M
On 7/7/2010 2:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
>
> When mail arrives to the mail server,
> I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
> a footer in the body like below, before dropping/relaying it to the
>
On 2010-07-07 2:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>> I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
>> postfix properly.
> Name it.
All of them?
>> Anything that interferes with that is not worth the effort.
> Which do you
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 14:30, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2010-07-07 2:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>>> I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
>>> postfix properly.
>
>> Name it.
>
> All of them?
No. Clearly not
I do accept mail besides postini. But when I track this mail (spam)
back it is comming through postini. What I'm seeing is a spike in
spam. This will normally last for 1 week or so then stop. But during
that time. All heck breaks loose for me. I admin other domains besides
mychoice.cc. Some
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
> Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
> Problem exist with Postfix on it. They've said to address it with
> Postfix. I personally think the specific problems are more of how
> Ubuntu handles Postfix poorly. On
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 15:57 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> > 1 mailbox = 1 mail user = NON-unix user = hans (me)
>
> Local domains with deliveries via local(8) are meant for local (Unix)
> users. Either
>
>a) use another delivery agent in place of local(8) by setting
> local_transport (ra
Phil Howard wrote:
>
> No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
> Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
> suspect at least some surely must be less so.
>
No FUD please. I've deployed smtp servers running hpux, solaris,
slackware, redha
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
>
>> Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
>> Problem exist with Postfix on it. They've said to address it with
>> Postfix. I personally think the specific pr
> No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
> Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
> suspect at least some surely must be less so.
Why not simply avoid whatever hassles you're encountering with your
distribution's version of the software
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:11, Joe wrote:
> I currently run a number of production mail servers on ubuntu LTS and
> have never seen any of the problems you're struggling with.
Are you using the packaged version of Postfix, or the source you
compile yourself?
--
sHiFt HaPpEnS!
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:14, Gary Chambers wrote:
>> No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
>> Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
>> suspect at least some surely must be less so.
>
> Why not simply avoid whatever hassles you're enco
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:13:00 Phil Howard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
> >> Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
> >> Problem exist with Postfix on it. They've said to a
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:14:08 Gary Chambers wrote:
> > No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
> > Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
> > suspect at least some surely must be less so.
>
> Why not simply avoid whatever hassles y
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:22:22 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:13:00 Phil Howard wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
> > >> Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've
Phil Howard wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:11, Joe wrote:
>
>
>> I currently run a number of production mail servers on ubuntu LTS and
>> have never seen any of the problems you're struggling with.
>>
>
> Are you using the packaged version of Postfix, or the source you
> compile yourse
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST,
> Jerry wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
> > Victoriano Giralt articulated:
> >
> > > I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions for mail routing
> > > and is i
07.07.2010 20:27, Matt Hayes:
> On 7/7/2010 2:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>> Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
>>
>> When mail arrives to the mail server,
>> I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
>> a footer in the body like below,
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:40:30PM +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> 07.07.2010 20:27, Matt Hayes:
>
> > On 7/7/2010 2:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
> >> Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
> >>
> >> When mail arrives to the mail server,
> >> I like to convert any attachm
I'm new to Postfix, and I'm learning all I can from the readme files.
However, I'm using CentOS 5.5 and the repo contains v2.3 of postfix.
Building from source is causing strange problems with yum. Is there anywhere
I don't know about where I can find an RPM for a current version of Postfix?
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:32:43AM +0100, Matthew Valentino wrote:
> I'm new to Postfix, and I'm learning all I can from the readme files.
> However, I'm using CentOS 5.5 and the repo contains v2.3 of postfix.
> Building from source is causing strange problems with yum. Is there anywhere
> I don't
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 00:32:43 +0100, Matthew Valentino wrote:
> I'm new to Postfix, and I'm learning all I can from the readme files.
> However, I'm using CentOS 5.5 and the repo contains v2.3 of postfix.
> Building from source is causing strange problems with yum. Is there
> anywhere I don't kno
Awesome! Thank you for that link!
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 00:32:43 +0100, Matthew Valentino wrote:
>
> > I'm new to Postfix, and I'm learning all I can from the readme files.
> > However, I'm using CentOS 5.5 and the repo contains v2.3 of post
Anyone out there been able to configure postfix with TLS certificate support on
AIX?
I am trying to get postfix running on a RS/6000 running AIX 5.3.0.0. Postfix is
working, it sends mail, which is all we want this server to do (it will never
need to receive). Where I am running into trouble is
Jerry put forth on 7/7/2010 8:09 AM:
> Why are you setting configuration parameters to their default setting?
> It doesn't serve any purpose that I am aware of.
I've seen this quite a bit. It leads me to believe there are some Linux
distros that ship with this stuff in main.cf by default. IIRC
On 07/07/2010 01:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
>
> When mail arrives to the mail server,
> I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
> a footer in the body like below, before dropping/relaying it to the
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 23:39 -0700, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
> Very aware spammers can create their own domains and and SPF records. They
> can do essentially the same thing with any anti spam measures. And I have
> see a number of them do just that, an SPF record of entire IPv4 address
>Having a cover-all SPF record doesnot mean the domain is spamming.
You missed this:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/current/0126.html
D.
* Jorge Armando Medina :
> On 07/07/2010 01:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> > Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
> >
> > When mail arrives to the mail server,
> > I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
> > a footer in the body like belo
41 matches
Mail list logo
