On Wed, April 14, 2010 9:00 am, mouss wrote:
> Voytek Eymont a écrit :
>> Apr 13 20:35:27 postfix/qmgr[3973]: 777DAB446E8:
>> from=, size=7709303, nrcpt=13 (queue active)
>
> so you're sending mail to yahoo with a google sender address? you must be
> very optimistic...
>
> anyway, sending mail to
On Wed, April 14, 2010 12:19 am, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Zitat von Voytek Eymont :
> Sending mail with a invalid envelope from address is not a option
> (anymore). Everyone how cares about reliable delivery must use a valid
> mail-from, anything other is crap and will be treated as such.
An
Hi All,
Searched on the web for this but couldn't find anything close to what
I'm looking for.
Any of you know tool that generates web based (graph) statistics based
on information in the postfix logfile.
I'm looking for things like amount of messages sent/received daily
weekly monthly etc
* Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL :
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Searched on the web for this but couldn't find anything close to what
> I'm looking for.
>
> Any of you know tool that generates web based (graph) statistics based
> on information in the postfix logfile.
>
> I'm looking for things li
Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL skrev 2010-04-14 10:50:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Searched on the web for this but couldn't find anything close to what
> I'm looking for.
>
> Any of you know tool that generates web based (graph) statistics based
> on information in the postfix logfile.
>
> I'm l
>>Patric Falinder
>Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL skrev 2010-04-14 10:50:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Searched on the web for this but couldn't find anything close to what
> I'm looking for.
>
> Any of you know tool that generates web based (graph) statistics based
> on information in the postfix l
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:17:51 +0200, "Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL"
wrote:
>>>Patric Falinder
>>Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL skrev 2010-04-14 10:50:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Searched on the web for this but couldn't find anything close to what
>> I'm looking for.
>>
>> Any of you kn
* Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL :
> One thing I'm missing (or at least my management is), they want to be
> able to see how many messages where sent/received on specific days.
> So instaid of a total amount of messages sent/received the current day
> or in the entire week/month/year, they wan
>http://jimsun.linxnet.com/postfix_contrib.html
This will do just fine!
Thanks all for the suggestions.
John Schmitt:
> I want to thank you and Viktor for replying.
>
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:18:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > John Schmitt:
> [...]
> > > Transcript of session follows.
> > >
> > > Out: 220 mymachine.mydomain.net ESMTP Postfix
> > > In: HELO mymachine
> > > Out: 250 myma
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 08:49:42PM -0700, John Schmitt wrote:
> > > Out: 220 mymachine.mydomain.net ESMTP Postfix
> > > In: HELO mymachine
> > > Out: 250 mymachine.mydomain.net
> > > In: MAIL FROM:<>
> > > Out: 250 2.1.0 Ok
> > > In: RCPT TO:<"???B?\" >
> > > Out: 501 5.1.3 Bad recipient
Hi,
Is it possible to send a group-mail in a easy way to every recipient in
a specific domain?
Thanks,
Patric
2010/4/14 Patric Falinder :
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to send a group-mail in a easy way to every recipient in
> a specific domain?
Well well.. it depends. if it is you own domain, then just create
alias on postfix and then just send mail to that alias.
--
Eero
On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:32 PM, Jim Wright wrote:
I'm setting up a new server completely from scratch on Snow Leopard,
Mac OS X 10.6.3, trying to compile Postfix 2.7. During make, I get
this:
In file included from dns_lookup.c:152:
dns.h:23:29: error: nameser8_compat.h: No such file or direc
Eero Volotinen skrev 2010-04-14 14:24:
> 2010/4/14 Patric Falinder :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it possible to send a group-mail in a easy way to every recipient in
>> a specific domain?
>
> Well well.. it depends. if it is you own domain, then just create
> alias on postfix and then just send mail to that a
2010/4/14 Patric Falinder :
> Eero Volotinen skrev 2010-04-14 14:24:
> ah thanks, I didn't even think of that!
>
remember to protect that alias from spammers also.
--
Eero
Jim Wright:
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:32 PM, Jim Wright wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a new server completely from scratch on Snow Leopard,
> > Mac OS X 10.6.3, trying to compile Postfix 2.7. During make, I get
> > this:
> >
> > In file included from dns_lookup.c:152:
> > dns.h:23:29: error: nam
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 17:45 -0700, Gary Smith wrote:
> > The script just does:
> >
> > * Copy in new relay_recipients file
> > * postmap relay_recipients
> > * postfix reload
> >
> > Is there a better way to do this? Should I stop postfix completely during
> > this time? Will putting the que
fakessh a écrit :
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro
> wrote:
>> Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not
> list
>> domain fakessh.eu in *BOTH *mydestination and virtual_alias_domains
>>
>>
>>
>
> this error I do not know how to correct
> my mail
Quoting fakessh :
fakessh a écrit :
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro
wrote:
Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not
list
domain fakessh.eu in *BOTH *mydestination and virtual_alias_domains
this error I do not know how to correct
my mai
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 09:33:34AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> What is the output from the following commands on this machine?
>
> uname -s
> uname -r
> uname -v
$ ls /usr/include/arpa/nameser_compat.h
/usr/include/arpa/nameser_compat.h
$ uname -s
Darwin
$ uname -r
10.3.0
$ uname
On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What is the output from the following commands on this machine?
uname -s
uname -r
uname -v
In case this is useful. From Leopard 10.5 not Snow Leopard 10.6.
$ ls -l /usr/include/arpa/nameser*
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel12 Mar 29
On 4/13/2010 10:01 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Gary Smith put forth on 4/13/2010 7:07 PM:
Currently we are using mysql plugin for this and are switching over to static
files (or files generated on a schedule from the database). Anyway, looking at
the docs, it says that the entry need only been f
> No, there must be a "result" with the address, but postfix
> doesn't use that result. The file will look like:
>
> u...@example.com anything
> us...@example.com anything
> us...@example.com anything
>
> "anything" can be any text, such as an administrative comment.
That's what I thought. I
On 4/13/2010 7:45 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
The script just does:
* Copy in new relay_recipients file
* postmap relay_recipients
* postfix reload
Is there a better way to do this? Should I stop postfix completely during
this time? Will putting the queue on hold avoid this problem, or do I need
to
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:53:03PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Currently, sites that send valid UTF-8 in MAIL/RCPT commands can
> make meaningful LDAP queries in Postfix. Lots of MTAs are 8-bit
> clean internally, so this can actually work today.
>
> Do we want to remove this ability from Post
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 08:49:42PM -0700, John Schmitt wrote:
> A few lines like this:
>
> Message-ID: <760857006668.qgjlcbdx...@ms49.hinet.net>
> From: "B\"
> To: lili928...@yahoo.com.tw
>
> are in the headers of an email message sitting in my yahoo inbox.
If the Yahoo inbox serv
Victor Duchovni:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:53:03PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Currently, sites that send valid UTF-8 in MAIL/RCPT commands can
> > make meaningful LDAP queries in Postfix. Lots of MTAs are 8-bit
> > clean internally, so this can actually work today.
> >
> > Do we want t
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:54:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I am a bit reluctant at this time to assume that untyped data coming in
> > that looks like UTF-8, really is UTF-8. Even if the LDAP lookup returns
> > plausibly useful results, will the UTF-8 envelope survive related
> > processin
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:07:51 +, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
> Quoting fakessh :
>
>> fakessh a écrit :
>>> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:38:28 -0300, Egberto Monteiro
>>> wrote:
Apr 13 23:31:35 r13151 postfix/trivial-rewrite[5504]: warning: do not
>>> list
domain fakessh.eu in *BOTH *my
On 2010-04-14 1:47 PM, fakessh wrote:
> correct to this error
> my log
Please do NOT send verbose logs unless requested to do so...
Disable verbose logging, and then provide a complete log transaction of
ONLY one message exhibiting the problem.
--
Best regards,
Charles
I was wondering if there is an easy way for postfix (debian lenny) to
restrict a few mailboxes to only allow a specific list of MTAs to be
sending email to those recipients. Ideally I would like to have this
list in a format like x.x.x.x/xx.
Thank you,
Jeroen
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> On 2010-04-14 1:47 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> correct to this error
>> my log
>
> Please do NOT send verbose logs unless requested to do so...
>
> Disable verbose logging, and then provide a complete log transaction of
> ONLY one message exh
On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
wrote:
On 2010-04-14 1:47 PM, fakessh wrote:
correct to this error
my log
Please do NOT send verbose logs unless requested to do so...
Disable verbose logging, and then provide a complete log transactio
Hi there. Some days ago 1 of our postfix servers was abused by bot
networks using one of our customer's stolen credentials, inadvertently
done by a virus/keylogger probably. In few hours more than 2 spam
messages were in our queue. Looking at the logs I realized all those
outgoing messages
On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
What is the output from the following commands on this machine?
uname -s
uname -r
uname -v
In case this is useful. From Leopard 10.5 not Snow Leopard 10.6.
I had no issues (that
Hello
I'm routing messages from my MDA to MTA-1, when the destination domain
name matches some criteria; and to MTA-2, when destination domain
matches another criteria. And everything works well.
I wonder if I can do this, routing messages based on destination IP
instead.
Thanks in advance
Er
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:50:34 -0500, Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 4/14/2010 1:45 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:12:25 -0400, Charles Marcus
>> wrote:
I changed the entries @fakessh to r...@localhost in /etc/postfix/virtual
postmap then a file to
the postfix restart.
all without suc
Eric Abreu:
> Hello
> I'm routing messages from my MDA to MTA-1, when the destination domain
> name matches some criteria; and to MTA-2, when destination domain
> matches another criteria. And everything works well.
> I wonder if I can do this, routing messages based on destination IP
> instead.
Summary: Thanks for all of the responses. I originally thought this
was a Postfix issue, but now I see that I was doing something invalid
in DNS. I'm surprised that my otherwise excellent nameserver provider
allowed me to do this.
Voytek Eymont a écrit :
> On Wed, April 14, 2010 12:19 am, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
>> Zitat von Voytek Eymont :
>
>> Sending mail with a invalid envelope from address is not a option
>> (anymore). Everyone how cares about reliable delivery must use a valid
>> mail-from, anything other is crap a
Voytek Eymont a écrit :
> On Wed, April 14, 2010 9:00 am, mouss wrote:
>> Voytek Eymont a écrit :
>
>>> Apr 13 20:35:27 postfix/qmgr[3973]: 777DAB446E8:
>>> from=, size=7709303, nrcpt=13 (queue active)
>> so you're sending mail to yahoo with a google sender address? you must be
>> very optimistic.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:17:14AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> John Schmitt:
> > I want to thank you and Viktor for replying.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:18:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > John Schmitt:
> > [...]
> > > > Transcript of session follows.
> > > >
> > > > Out: 220 mym
John Schmitt:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:17:14AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > John Schmitt:
> > > I want to thank you and Viktor for replying.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:18:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > > John Schmitt:
> > > [...]
> > > > > Transcript of session follows.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:29:16PM -0700, John Schmitt wrote:
> Should I file a bug? If so, against which software?
That depends on whether what you are trying to do makes sense in the
first place. What are you trying to do? So far you've explained
various symptoms, but not the big picture.
If
Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:54:47PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > I am a bit reluctant at this time to assume that untyped data coming in
> > > that looks like UTF-8, really is UTF-8. Even if the LDAP lookup returns
> > > plausibly useful results, will the UTF-8 envelope su
We use a filter to break out and run our spamassassin and other checks. In bash
shell that process, we have a need to insert a custom unique header per email
for compliance. Is there a simple way of doing this without having to go into
any special mime processing of the message?
Gary Smith
Mark Martinec skrev 2010-04-13 14:17:
> Patric,
>
>> I looked in to it a little more and it looks like Maia re-writes the
>> new.sub.domain.com to sub.domain.com.
>> I get:
>>
>> /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[22834]: (22834-04) Checking: [62.127.194.20]
>> ->
>> ,
>>
>> When I guess it should be:
>>
>> /
Patric Falinder skrev 2010-04-15 08:21:
> Mark Martinec skrev 2010-04-13 14:17:
>> Patric,
>>
>>> I looked in to it a little more and it looks like Maia re-writes the
>>> new.sub.domain.com to sub.domain.com.
>>> I get:
>>>
>>> /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[22834]: (22834-04) Checking: [62.127.194.20]
>>>
49 matches
Mail list logo
