On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:17:14AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > John Schmitt: > > I want to thank you and Viktor for replying. > > > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:18:38PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > John Schmitt: > > [...] > > > > Transcript of session follows. > > > > > > > > Out: 220 mymachine.mydomain.net ESMTP Postfix > > > > In: HELO mymachine > > > > Out: 250 mymachine.mydomain.net > > > > In: MAIL FROM:<> > > > > Out: 250 2.1.0 Ok > > > > In: RCPT TO:<"???B?\" <olpcxcqkkqc...@aol.com>> > > > > Out: 501 5.1.3 Bad recipient address syntax > > Some software author assumes that it can take an address form that > is valid in message headers: > > To: "full name" <u...@example.com> > > and then use that same form in RCPT TO commands. > > The correct RCPT TO command syntax is: > > RCPT TO:<u...@example.com> > > as defined in RFC documents 20 years ago. > > Yes, the software's quoting algorithm is busted, too. > > Wietse
Should I file a bug? If so, against which software? Thanks for your input.
