On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 09:03 +0530, an...@isac.gov.in wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> We are using the smtpd-policyd feature from long time to allow some
> specific users to receive higher size mails. It is working fine.
> But, it does not work when the recipient_count is more than one as we
> are
an...@isac.gov.in:
> Dear List,
>
> We are using the smtpd-policyd feature from long time to allow some
> specific users to receive higher size mails. It is working fine.
> But, it does not work when the recipient_count is more than one as we
> are comparing the value with recipient.
>
>
I currently have in main.cf like:
message_size_limit = 1024
and
virtual_mailbox_limit = 1024
so, if I want to increase it, I need also increase virtual_mailbox_limit
to at least same as message_size_limit
can I just use message_size_limit = value, and, don't worry about
virtual_mailbox_l
Hello,
I guess this message is off-topic as it is only loosely related to postfix.
You may stop reading this now if you are non interested in such topics.
---
I am responsible for a mailing list with roughly half a million
subscribers. The flow is outgoing only as we send a newsletter to
subs
I know postfix has no native support for "Sender Rewriting Scheme" (IMHO
it should ..)
We implement forwarding using virtual_alias_maps or using cyrus+sieve.
So what is the recommended way to implement SRS. I think since a milter
now can do sender rewrite that will be the easiest way to do it
On 3/31/2010 6:37 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
I currently have in main.cf like:
message_size_limit = 1024
and
virtual_mailbox_limit = 1024
so, if I want to increase it, I need also increase virtual_mailbox_limit
to at least same as message_size_limit
can I just use message_size_limit = va
helo people
i has been (unlucky) searching a lot in the list archives and google for
a way to having a dual scheme for delivering message queue, one for
messages below 2 megabytes, this kind with inmediately deliver and
messages over this limit with delivery only between 18:00 and 6:00
someb
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:31:29AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Better choices include
> - set virtual_mailbox_limit to some large value you don't ever expect to
> exceed, maybe 10x ~ 100x the message_size_limit.
> - set "virtual_mailbox_limit = $message_size_limit" so that changes to
> message_si
Victor:
Thanks again for the suggestions. Having removed fallback_relay has
stopped the loops, but I am still challenged in setting up the failover to
the second relayhost.
Unless there is something I am missing, using a local DNS server to create
the failover isn't an option for me. I can't u
Hello,
For me you have to do a script which select the message over 2 megabytes
and put them hold.
At night you put those mail on queue.
With the command postqueue -p and command awk you can put email on hold.
Like this to hold email on day :
On cron you put this => postqueue -p| awk 'BEGIN {
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:28:22PM -0400, Jon Giles wrote:
> Thanks again for the suggestions. Having removed fallback_relay has
> stopped the loops, but I am still challenged in setting up the failover to
> the second relayhost.
>
> Unless there is something I am missing, using a local DNS ser
Victor:
Thanks for the tips. After removing fallback_relay from my main.cf the
loops stopped when the mailbox server is offline, but I still need to set up
the second relayhost.
I don't think a local DNS server would work out for us. The relayhosts may
change their IPs, and so it would be best
Sorry for missing this.
I have these emails going to a special mailbox and I forgot.
Sorry again, but thanks again for the help and I will try this out today!
jg
On 3/31/10 1:55 PM, "Victor Duchovni"
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:28:22PM -0400, Jon Giles wrote:
>
>> Thanks again for th
My mailserver is behing a firewall that also does nat tranlastion. So
the inside has a dmz zone. When you hit from the oustide you hit the
outside / public ip numbers. You are hitting the firewall box. Then
going in to the dmz zone. The firewall is setup to route the proper
ports back and f
On 3/31/2010 3:46 PM, Josh Cason wrote:
My mailserver is behing a firewall that also does nat tranlastion. So
the inside has a dmz zone. When you hit from the oustide you hit the
outside / public ip numbers. You are hitting the firewall box. Then
going in to the dmz zone. The firewall is setup to
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> Ok. Please see:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#undisclosed_recipients_header
>
> Either leaving undisclosed_recipients_header at its default value by
> removing it from your main.cf, or explicitly setting it empty should fix
> th
Steve a écrit :
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:44:58 +0200
>> Von: Louis-David Mitterrand
>> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule?
>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:17PM +0200, Steve wrote:
>>> Ohhh boy. Now looking at the re
Hi
I want to stop MAIL FROM: someb...@[a.b.c.d] (IP address) being accepted.
My impression would have been the config below would do this as say [1.1.1.1]
does not have A or MX records.
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
reject_unknown_sender_domain
How can I achieve my goal.
Regards Paul En
Sharma, Ashish a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am running my postfix with 3 mail filters and 2 content filters (actually
> one of the content filter (amavisd) is piping it's output to the other).
>
> My question here is how can I make sure to make my setup robust in the sense
> that if one of the mai
On Thu, April 1, 2010 1:31 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 3/31/2010 6:37 AM, Voytek Eymont wrote:
> "no limit" is usually a bad choice; unexpected things can happen.
> Better choices include
> - set virtual_mailbox_limit to some large value you don't ever
> expect to exceed, maybe 10x ~ 100x the mes
Paul Enlund a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I want to stop MAIL FROM: someb...@[a.b.c.d] (IP address) being accepted.
> My impression would have been the config below would do this as say
> [1.1.1.1]
> does not have A or MX records.
>
try a check_sender_access with a pcre map:
/@\[/ REJECT Sorry, we do n
I have a setup where the local deliver using cyrus-imapd is located on
an encrypted volume. When the server is rebooted, we will manually
mount the volume and start the cyrus application. However, until we
start cyrus, how can i configure postfix to accept email but defer or
hold the local de
On 3/31/2010 7:41 PM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
I have a setup where the local deliver using cyrus-imapd is located on
an encrypted volume. When the server is rebooted, we will manually mount
the volume and start the cyrus application. However, until we start
cyrus, how can i configure postfix to acc
On 3/31/2010 9:58 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/31/2010 7:41 PM, Vernon A. Fort wrote:
I have a setup where the local deliver using cyrus-imapd is located on
an encrypted volume. When the server is rebooted, we will manually mount
the volume and start the cyrus application. However, until we start
24 matches
Mail list logo
