Steve a écrit : > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:44:58 +0200 >> Von: Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex+lists-postfix-us...@apartia.org> >> An: postfix-users@postfix.org >> Betreff: Re: max length of pcre rule? > >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 04:38:17PM +0200, Steve wrote: >>> Ohhh boy. Now looking at the regexp I see an error. Every line >>> starting with "/[^:]*.+" should be replaced by "/[^:]*:.+". Sorry for >>> that. >>> >> Hi Steve, >> > Hello Louis-David, > > >> You if/endif suggestion for the prefix is interesting. >> >> For added safety, the individual rules should be anchored with ^ and the >> bracketed atom plussed, no? >> >> /^[^:]+:.+ >> > I have fixed some issues in your regexp and sorted the rules: > if > /^Received|^X\-((Origin(ating)?|Client|MDRemote|Sender)\-?IP|(Client|Remote_)Addr|PHP\-Script):/ > /\b(41\.1(6\d|7[0-5])\.\d+\.\d+)\b/ > REJECT aviso.ci junk 2 > [snip]
you're not trying to implement an IP BL using string matches in header_checks, are you? This is inefficient. if you want to do that, write a content_filter/proxy_filter/milter that extracts the string, converts it to an IP and checks that in a cidr map. of course, this is already implemented in spamassassin... if you're avoiding SA because of performances, we're sure you'll get back to country after some travel:)
