When a message reenters from an instance that uses XFORWARD, for example
amavis, will Postfix count the IP used twice and, for example,
add that to smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit?
p...@rick
--
All technical questions asked privately will be automatically answered on the
list and archived fo
Hi @ll,
is there a way to overide
transport table for specific
sender domains
Backgound:
ich have two domains
which deliver out over a relay
by
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps,
also, there is a mailman list and virtual domains
on the server which deliver directly out
for known reasons i want to
Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/18/2010 10:41 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi All
My problem is describe here
http://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg16775.html
Basically I have a mysql table with thousands recipients , on the left
hand I have recipient and on the right hand I have the action (REJE
Wietse Venema:
> Sean Reifschneider:
> > On 03/18/2010 05:57 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > If the Postfix milter_protocol setting specifies a too high
> > > version, the libmilter library simply hangs up without logging
> >
> > We've tried protocol versions 2, 4, and 6 with the same error
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> When a message reenters from an instance that uses XFORWARD, for example
> amavis, will Postfix count the IP used twice and, for example,
> add that to smtpd_client_recipient_rate_limit?
Rate limits apply to the real client IP address not the forwarded one,
subject to $smtp
Robert Schetterer:
> Hi @ll,
> is there a way to overide
> transport table for specific
> sender domains
Content filter overrides transport_maps.
Wietse
I am resending this because I've accidentaly sent the last email in
HTML format, sorry.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: every...@example.com virtual_alias_maps using ldap query
> From: Victor Duchovni
> To: Ronie Gilberto Henrich
> Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Thu M
Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi @ll,
>> is there a way to overide
>> transport table for specific
>> sender domains
>
> Content filter overrides transport_maps.
>
> Wietse
Thx Wiestse for info, such was i expected,
in my/this case its no urgent enough
Robert Schetterer:
> Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Robert Schetterer:
> >> Hi @ll,
> >> is there a way to overide
> >> transport table for specific
> >> sender domains
> >
> > Content filter overrides transport_maps.
> >
> > Wietse
>
> Thx Wiestse for info, such was i expec
Hi there,
I know this isn't exactly a Postfix question, but as postfix's
administrators the users of this list probably can answer the
question.
Does anyone can recommend any good alternative to Mailman as a Mailing
Lists Manager that plugs well with Postfix?
My only problem with Mailman is that
One of my users had problems receiving from Yahoo a couple days ago. The sender
(in FLA) got this:
>> From: "mailer-dae...@yahoo.com"
>> To: xx...@yahoo.com
>> Sent: Sun, March 7, 2010 5:51:09 PM
>> Subject: failure notice
>>
>> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
>> I'm afraid I w
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:27:21PM +0200, Alex wrote:
> Noel Jones wrote:
> >On 3/18/2010 10:41 AM, Alex wrote:
> >>In case of am multi-recipient message, if I use
> >>check_recipient_access and one of recipients is found in that
> >>table, the all message is rejected and affects all recipients
>
We use Majordomo2 for the postgresql.org lists, and this definitely allows
for supp...@domain1 seperate from supp...@domain2 ...
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
Hi there,
I know this isn't exactly a Postfix question, but as postfix's
administrators the users of this list probab
Hi,
On last Postfix install on new server some mails are refused with error
550 5.7.1 se the report :
: host gw.aflo.be[87.66.26.108] said: 550 5.7.1 Your email
messages have been blocked by the recipient OR by Trend Micro Email
Reputation Ser
Hi Marc,
Thanks for your suggestion: I'll take a look at it.
Last time I used majordomo was in the 90's, I don't know if there is a
web interface. Can you tell me if there is a official one? Or can you
recommend another software to ease the management?
Again, thanks.
Mauro
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010
>Last time I used majordomo was in the 90's, I don't know if there is a
>web interface. Can you tell me if there is a official one? Or can you
>recommend another software to ease the management?
Majordomo2 is a complete rewrite from scratch. All it shares with mj1
is the basic commands used in co
The problem occur when we send mail to this domain, we had no problems
before we changed our IP mail server and MX record for our domain.
Sam.
Martijn de Munnik - Postfix List a écrit :
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:06:42 +0100, Sam Przyswa
wrote:
Hi,
On last Postfix install on new server some
Hi again,
I'm using a setup integrated with Active Directory with Maildir and I
need to do some filtering in messages (basically manipulating some
headers).
Using procmail as a transport like:
---
procmail unix - n n - - pipe
flags=Ru user=vmail argv=/usr/bin/pro
Thanks John,
With that words said, definitively I'll give it a try.
Mauro
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:19 AM, John Levine wrote:
>>Last time I used majordomo was in the 90's, I don't know if there is a
>>web interface. Can you tell me if there is a official one? Or can you
>>recommend another sof
Sam Przyswa:
> Hi,
>
> On last Postfix install on new server some mails are refused with error
> 550 5.7.1 se the report :
>
>
> : host gw.aflo.be[87.66.26.108] said: 550 5.7.1 Your email
> messages have been blocked by the recipient OR by Trend M
/dev/rob0 wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:27:21PM +0200, Alex wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 3/18/2010 10:41 AM, Alex wrote:
In case of am multi-recipient message, if I use
check_recipient_access and one of recipients is found in that
table, the all message is rejected and affects all recipien
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:31:18 +0100, Sam Przyswa
wrote:
> The problem occur when we send mail to this domain, we had no problems
> before we changed our IP mail server and MX record for our domain.
Your mailserver seems to be listed on several blacklists, please fix those
problems first.
Backsca
Sam Przyswa:
> The problem occur when we send mail to this domain, we had no problems
> before we changed our IP mail server and MX record for our domain.
In that case, it is likely that the IP address triggers a reject
by the Trend Micro Email Reputation Service.
For example:
- You are suddenl
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:06:42PM +0100, Sam Przyswa wrote:
> On last Postfix install on new server some mails are refused with
> error 550 5.7.1 se the report :
>
>
> : host gw.aflo.be[87.66.26.108] said: 550 5.7.1 Your email
>messages have been b
On 3/18/2010 5:28 PM, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
This whitelist is 1409 records long, so indeed as you say very small. I
suppose I could download it and host it locally. Apparently AXFR is not
allowed, but plain text HTTP download is, so that's good enough.
Then I would only need an efficient and ro
Hello,
I have a somewhat busy mail relay running postfix 2.7, which has
problems with a slow destination.
The symptom: the incoming queue grows large, the active queue is always
at qmgr_message_active_limit and only (well, mostly) contains messages
for the slow domain.
What I have already tri
What about setting a second instance up to use for your
slow destinations. Then you can route to that instance from
your production instance and keep those messages from
impacting the faster sites.
Cheers,
Ken
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:58:42PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a some
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 03:58:42PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> I have a somewhat busy mail relay running postfix 2.7, which has problems
> with a slow destination.
> I can't limit the number (or rate) of incoming e-mails for that domain, and
> I can't increase the throughput of the destination,
Mauro Faccenda wrote:
> Does anyone can recommend any good alternative to Mailman as a Mailing
> Lists Manager that plugs well with Postfix?
I heard some praise for http://www.sympa.org/
But I never used it myself.
--
Martin
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:10:18PM -0300, Ronie Gilberto Henrich wrote:
> If the LDAP object needs to expans to all user addresses, make it an
> LDAP-URI valued group. If the group is large (thousands of recipients), do
> the expansion on a dedicated list server, not your primary Postfix queue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 19/3/10 16:17, Martin Schütte wrote:
> Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>> Does anyone can recommend any good alternative to Mailman as a Mailing
>> Lists Manager that plugs well with Postfix?
>
> I heard some praise for http://www.sympa.org/
> But I nev
Attila Nagy:
> So:
> - is there any way to let other domains get into the active queue in a
No.
Just like ordinary programs read large files sequentially using a
limited amount of intermediate buffer space, the Postfix queue
manager "reads" a large queue sequentially using a limited amount
of b
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:08:12AM -0600, Glenn English wrote:
> It looks to me like the problem has something to do with DNS, not
> SMTP, right?
Yes.
> And why would Yahoo be doing a CNAME lookup?
Their MTA does that for all destinations, among other lookups.
> (I checked
> from a remote site
Hm... that makes two recommendations, I'll take a look at it as well.
Thanks Victoriano and Martin.
Mauro
2010/3/19 Victoriano Giralt :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On 19/3/10 16:17, Martin Schütte wrote:
>> Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>> Does anyone can recommend any go
On 19 Mar 2010, at 15:53, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
> Hm... that makes two recommendations, I'll take a look at it as well.
> Thanks Victoriano and Martin.
I have quite easily integrate mlmmj with Postfix, it's rather nice one you get
setup. No fiddly web interfaces to worry about, it's all handl
On 03/19/10 16:13, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Forward mail for this domain to a separate queue (Postfix instance)
that handles mail for this---and perhaps some other similar---domains.
The slow domain will no longer clog your primary queue.
You are right that this will solve the problem, but isn'
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 06:08:12AM -0600, Glenn English wrote:
>
> > It looks to me like the problem has something to do with DNS, not
> > SMTP, right?
>
> Yes.
>
> > And why would Yahoo be doing a CNAME lookup?
>
> Their MTA does that for all destinations, among other lookup
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:50:01AM -0300, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
> I know this isn't exactly a Postfix question, but as postfix's
I plan to make it one. :)
> administrators the users of this list probably can answer the
> question.
>
> Does anyone can recommend any good alternative to Mailman as
Attila Nagy:
> I've only written this, because I was sure that somebody would miss it.
> This destination is not slow because of slow delivery times on the
> already open connections, but because of connection timeouts (I can
> observe this on other, mostly silent systems, which send only few
>
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:53:08 -0200
Mauro Faccenda replied:
>Hm... that makes two recommendations, I'll take a look at it as well.
>
>Thanks Victoriano and Martin.
>
>Mauro
>
>2010/3/19 Victoriano Giralt :
>> On 19/3/10 16:17, Martin Schütte wrote:
>>> Mauro Faccenda wrote:
Does anyone can re
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Your DNS server is a bit odd:
>
> $ dig +trace -t any slsware.com
>
>...
>slsware.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.richeyrentals.com.
>slsware.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.slsware.com.
>slsware
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:35 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
[...]
>>
>> My only problem with Mailman is that I can't have two lists with
>> the same 'mailbox' (the part before the @) in different virtual
>> domains (i.e. supp...@company.com and supp...@anothercompany.com),
>> and this is mandatory in my set
I'm sorry but since I install Postfix (a lot of years) it's the first
time I have this problem, (blacklisted in Backscatter.org, SORBS-SPAM)
and I would like to know why !
Actually the server is a mail relay for a Zimbra server (www.zimbra.com)
on two Vservers on the same host. I don't find an
Hi list,
I've created a small CA hierarchy using OpenSSL with the following
structure:
Root CA
_/ \_
/ \
Mail sub-CA Other sub-CA
On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Yahoo runs a modified qmail, and indeed:
>
> int dns_cname(sa)
> stralloc *sa;
> {
> int r;
> int loop;
> for (loop = 0;loop < 10;++loop)
> {
> if (!sa->len) return loop;
> if (sa->s[sa->len - 1] == ']') return loop;
> if (sa->s[sa->len
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:32:13PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > And why would Yahoo be doing a CNAME lookup?
> >
> > Their MTA does that for all destinations, among other lookups.
> >
> > Your DNS server is a bit odd:
> >
> > $ dig +trace -t any slsware.com
> >
> > ;; connection timed
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:28:07PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> On 03/19/10 16:13, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> Forward mail for this domain to a separate queue (Postfix instance)
>> that handles mail for this---and perhaps some other similar---domains.
>> The slow domain will no longer clog your prim
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:32:13PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > > And why would Yahoo be doing a CNAME lookup?
> > >
> > > Their MTA does that for all destinations, among other lookups.
> > >
> > > Your DNS server is a bit odd:
> > >
> > > $ dig +trace -t any slsware.c
I hope I am at the correct list for my question. I am brand new to postfix
moving from sendmail and have the following problem.
My domain mydomain.co.za is hosted by my ISP.
I have a internal mailserver in the office newly installed with postfix,
dovecot and mysql and setup my mydomain.co.za as
Martin Schütte wrote:
Mauro Faccenda wrote:
Does anyone can recommend any good alternative to Mailman as a Mailing
Lists Manager that plugs well with Postfix?
I heard some praise for http://www.sympa.org/
But I never used it myself.
a tremendous piece of work - truly industrial st
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:27:29 -0400 (EDT)
Wietse Venema wrote:
> Just to clarify, this DNS server is likely to create the same
> problem with other sites that run a version of the qmail MTA.
That sounds like a feature to me.
On Mar 19, 2010, at 2:26 PM, brian moore wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:27:29 -0400 (EDT)
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Just to clarify, this DNS server is likely to create the same
>> problem with other sites that run a version of the qmail MTA.
>
> That sounds like a feature to me.
Soon as I
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:26:03PM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:27:29 -0400 (EDT)
> Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Just to clarify, this DNS server is likely to create the same
> > problem with other sites that run a version of the qmail MTA.
>
> That sounds like a feature to
On 3/19/2010 2:59 PM, Isak Badenhorst wrote:
I hope I am at the correct list for my question. I am brand new to postfix
moving from sendmail and have the following problem.
My domain mydomain.co.za is hosted by my ISP.
I have a internal mailserver in the office newly installed with postfix,
do
Oleksii Krykun a écrit :
> If I use smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient=yes or
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions=reject_unlisted_recipient options all
> messages to non-existant addresses are rejected.
> But if anybody sends message to multiple addresses in same domain and
> one of them doesn't exist then
Mauro Faccenda a écrit :
> Hi again,
>
> I'm using a setup integrated with Active Directory with Maildir and I
> need to do some filtering in messages (basically manipulating some
> headers).
>
> Using procmail as a transport like:
> ---
> procmail unix - n n - - p
just for example my mta return other
> ===
> $ telnet localhost 25
> ...
> 220 mx.netoyen.net ESMTP Postfix
> EHLO some.host.example
> ...
> MAIL FROM:<>
> 250 2.1.0 Ok
> RCPT TO:
> 250 2.1.5 Ok
> RCPT TO:
> 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User
> unknown
> DATA
> 354 End data with .
> Sub
Hi Mouss,
Thanks for you answer.
Bellow some observations/questions.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:08 PM, mouss wrote:
[...]
>> This setup doesn't work well for me because it doesn't update the
>> maildirsize (I'm using the VDA patches in Postfix) file in the user's
>> Maildir and it doesn't automa
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>
> Alternative to that patch? I did some searches and as far as I could
> see, none of the alternatives (that I've found) could reject the
> message in SMTP. I think it's nice to not generate bouncing
> messages/backscatter. But if someone ha
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> Your DNS server is a bit odd:
The problem turned out to be the PIX. By default, it blocks T_ANY queries on
the outside port. But not the others. "ip audit signature 6053 disable" turns
that off.
Why Cisco and qmail would do things that gua
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:16 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:12:32PM -0400, zhong ming wu wrote:
>
> "Personalities" is not a valid concept here, but I think my guess
> might point you in the right direction.
>
This is the terminology used in master.cf manual page.
>
> You cann
Hi,
I am migrating the Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2010, but before we switch over
to new server, I want make a copy of email to new server for testing.
Existing Config:
Postfix -> Amavisd -> Exchange 2000
Here what I want :
Postfix ---> Amavisd -> Exchange 2000
---> Exchange 2010
I
postfix users put forth on 3/19/2010 8:34 PM:
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating the Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2010, but before we switch over
> to new server, I want make a copy of email to new server for testing.
>
>
> Existing Config:
>
> Postfix -> Amavisd -> Exchange 2000
>
> Here what I want :
>
On 3/19/2010 8:34 PM, postfix users wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating the Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2010, but before we switch
over to new server, I want make a copy of email to new server for testing.
Existing Config:
Postfix -> Amavisd -> Exchange 2000
Here what I want :
Postfix ---> Amavisd -> E
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:03:47PM -0400, zhong ming wu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:16 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 06:12:32PM -0400, zhong ming wu wrote:
> >
> > "Personalities" is not a valid concept here, but I think my guess
> > might point you in the right direction
hi all
is there a way to restrict a sender to send only to a fixed no.of recipients
in one mail! i want this to be kept as a general rule on my smtp out server
thanks
Hi,
Postfix 2.7.0 supports milter protocol 2, 3, 4 and
6. Postfix with milter_protocol=6 accepts a connection from
a milter that uses milter protocol 2. But its milter session
is broken because Postfix sends SMFIC_DATA event to the
milter. In milter protocol 2, SMFIC_DATA isn't supported. So
the c
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, K bharathan wrote:
> is there a way to restrict a sender to send only to a fixed no.of
> recipients in one mail! i want this to be kept as a general rule on my
> smtp out server
Use a policy server: http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html. I
do this with postfwd: htt
68 matches
Mail list logo
