On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 10:10 -0400, Manuel Mely wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to change my hostname based on the relay i'm using?
>
> For example, i have postfix servers in an ha config that relays to three
> differents mail service providers, this providers restricts me in what
> helo i have
>
Manuel Mely put forth on 3/15/2010 9:10 AM:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to change my hostname based on the relay i'm using?
>
> For example, i have postfix servers in an ha config that relays to three
> differents mail service providers, this providers restricts me in what
> helo i have
> to use; so
I have two virtual domains, e.g. domain1 and domain2
And I have us...@domain1, us...@domain1 and us...@domain2, us...@domain2.
Now I need to receive all mail to us...@domain2 into us...@domain1 mailbox,
us...@domain2 ->us...@domain1
and
us...@domain1->us...@domain2, us...@domain1->us...@domain2.
I
On 2010-03-16 Oleksii Krykun wrote:
> I have two virtual domains, e.g. domain1 and domain2
> And I have us...@domain1, us...@domain1 and us...@domain2, us...@domain2.
> Now I need to receive all mail to us...@domain2 into us...@domain1 mailbox,
> us...@domain2 ->us...@domain1
> and
> us...@domain1-
Hi all,
Can anyone suggest a way to force all NDRs generated by the bounce
daemon to be delivered by a particular transport?
Thanks in advance,
Aaron
2010/3/16 Ansgar Wiechers
>
> On 2010-03-16 Oleksii Krykun wrote:
> > I have two virtual domains, e.g. domain1 and domain2
> > And I have us...@domain1, us...@domain1 and us...@domain2, us...@domain2.
> > Now I need to receive all mail to us...@domain2 into us...@domain1 mailbox,
> > us...@domain2
Aaron Roberts:
> Hi all,
> Can anyone suggest a way to force all NDRs generated by
> the bounce daemon to be delivered by a particular transport?
You need to solve the right problem. Eliminate the reason why those
bounce messages are sent.
Wietse
>Aaron Roberts:
>> Hi all,
>> Can anyone suggest a way to force all NDRs generated by
>> the bounce daemon to be delivered by a particular transport?
>
>
> Wietse Venema:
>You need to solve the right problem. Eliminate the reason why those
>bounce messages are sent.
>
Yes. Unfortunately,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Manuel Mely put forth on 3/15/2010 9:10 AM:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a way to change my hostname based on the relay i'm using?
>>
>> For example, i have postfix servers in an ha config that relays to three
>> differents mail service providers, t
On 3/16/2010 6:48 AM, Oleksii Krykun wrote:
2010/3/16 Ansgar Wiechers
All works fine. But if I send message to non-existent mailbox (e.g.
us...@domain1) I receive true NDR but get following warning:
Mar 16 10:43:07 mail postfix/cleanup[28954]: warning: F41F4B82A:
unreasonable virtual_alias_maps
2010/3/16 Noel Jones :
> On 3/16/2010 6:48 AM, Oleksii Krykun wrote:
>>
>> 2010/3/16 Ansgar Wiechers
All works fine. But if I send message to non-existent mailbox (e.g.
us...@domain1) I receive true NDR but get following warning:
Mar 16 10:43:07 mail postfix/cleanup[28954]:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:12 AM, ram wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 10:10 -0400, Manuel Mely wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a way to change my hostname based on the relay i'm using?
>>
>> For example, i have postfix servers in an ha config that relays to three
>> differents mail service providers,
On 3/16/2010 7:41 AM, Oleksii Krykun wrote:
2010/3/16 Noel Jones:
Make the virtual aliases explicit.
8<
us...@domain2 us...@domain1
us...@domain2 us...@domain1
us...@domain1 us...@domain2
us...@domain1 us...@domain2
>8
Yes, this is the correct solution.
In future both domain
Hi,
we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute
force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound
spam.
The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform outbound spam
filtering following these rules (it's a bit more complicated than this,
but
On 2010-03-16 Oleksii Krykun wrote:
> 2010/3/16 Ansgar Wiechers
>> On 2010-03-16 Oleksii Krykun wrote:
>>> I set up two domain aliases:
>>> @domain1 @domain2
>>> and
>>> @domain2 @domain1
>>
>> This makes you a backscatterer, because Postfix will accept all mail
>> for both domain1 and domain2 and
I just noticed that I had a lot of these messages in my logs and was
just wondering what they were:
Mar 16 16:34:02 sexan postfix/smtpd[25331]: connect from unknown[unknown]
Mar 16 16:34:02 sexan postfix/smtpd[25331]: lost connection after
CONNECT from unknown[unknown]
Mar 16 16:34:02 sexan po
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:40 +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute
> force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound
> spam.
>
> The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform outbound spam
> f
On 3/16/2010 10:41 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
I just noticed that I had a lot of these messages in my logs and was
just wondering what they were:
Mar 16 16:34:02 sexan postfix/smtpd[25331]: connect from unknown[unknown]
Mar 16 16:34:02 sexan postfix/smtpd[25331]: lost connection after
CONNECT fr
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Patric Falinder
wrote:
> I just noticed that I had a lot of these messages in my logs and was just
> wondering what they were:
>
> Mar 16 16:34:02 sexan postfix/smtpd[25331]: connect from unknown[unknown]
> Mar 16 16:34:02 sexan postfix/smtpd[25331]: lost connecti
Manuel Mely:
> Do you have a monitoring tool in your network? Maybe it's a Nagios testing
> your smtp server.
> That also happens to me in my loadbalancer, keepalived test smtp port
> with a telnet and then disconnects and i have a lot of this message in
> my logs too.
>
> Is there a way to avoid
Hi there,
I am running a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0, with Postfix 2.8-20100306,
amavisd-new, SA like MTA, besides Squid and Bind DNS.
It was running as secondary MX, and not sending mails -besides bounces-
for a week or so since install without problems.
Yesterday, I set it up like gateway for
"Ing. Andr?s E. Gallo":
> Hi there,
> I am running a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0, with Postfix 2.8-20100306,
> amavisd-new, SA like MTA, besides Squid and Bind DNS.
>
> It was running as secondary MX, and not sending mails -besides bounces-
> for a week or so since install without problems.
>
>
Hi,
This is a weird one. From on campus (from any 10.0.0.0/8 address), when I
telnet to post 25 of the Postfix server and type in the ehlo start of the
handshake, I expect and get the following response:
ehlo beowulf
250-neskowin.linfield.edu
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 1500
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
25
On 3/16/2010 3:55 PM, Rob Tanner wrote:
> Hi,
> ehlo cheshire
> 250-neskowin.linfield.edu
> 250-PIPELINING
> 250-SIZE 1500
> 250-VRFY
> 250-ETRN
> 250-XXXA
Firewall SMTP "fixup" that breaks everything.
Commonly seen in Cisco PIX routers/firewalls.
Best option is to disable fixup.
> 250 8B
On 3/16/2010 2:55 PM, Rob Tanner wrote:
Hi,
This is a weird one. From on campus (from any 10.0.0.0/8 address), when
I telnet to post 25 of the Postfix server and type in the ehlo start of
the handshake, I expect and get the following response:
ehlo beowulf
250-neskowin.linfield.edu
250-PIPELINI
El 16/03/2010 16:46, Wietse Venema escribió:
>
>> The log showed:
>> -
>> 197382-Mar 15 19:03:49 fobos amavis[10328]: (10328-01-204) (!!)file(1)
>> utility (/usr/local/bin/file) FAILED: timed out
>>
> Amavis reports that the /usr/local/bin/file command is hanging.
> Note th
On-campus:
...
> 250-STARTTLS
...
Off-campus:
> 250-XXXA
CISCO fixup mode is an amazing technical achievement.
It will XXX server words not on a whitelist (and as the "A"
at the end demonstrates, it does this close to perfection).
It will XXX client commands not on a whitelist, as
Postfix runs fine on FreeBSD 8 (here, since November 2009) as well
as any FreeBSD vesion that I have been running since I started work
on Postfix in 1997.
Your problem is a broken operating system that causes timeouts in
Amavis, Postfix, and in other programs.
This is the Postfix mailing list. It
El 16/03/2010 17:23, Wietse Venema escribió:
> Postfix runs fine on FreeBSD 8 (here, since November 2009) as well
> as any FreeBSD vesion that I have been running since I started work
> on Postfix in 1997.
>
Ok.
> Your problem is a broken operating system that causes timeouts in
> Amavis, Postfi
I noticed today that many items expressed in main.cf appear to be what
"I think" is default value and should not be expressed. I was
wondering if this logic is correct:
If the following two values are identical, can I simply remove the
parameter from 'main.cf'?
r...@mail:~# postconf -n | grep "se
Carlos Mennens:
> I noticed today that many items expressed in main.cf appear to be what
> "I think" is default value and should not be expressed. I was
> wondering if this logic is correct:
>
> If the following two values are identical, can I simply remove the
> parameter from 'main.cf'?
>
> r..
On 3/16/2010 3:49 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
I noticed today that many items expressed in main.cf appear to be what
"I think" is default value and should not be expressed. I was
wondering if this logic is correct:
If the following two values are identical, can I simply remove the
parameter from '
Yep. That fixed it. Thanks.
On 3/16/10 1:00 PM, "Brian Evans - Postfix List"
wrote:
> On 3/16/2010 3:55 PM, Rob Tanner wrote:
>> Hi,
>> ehlo cheshire
>> 250-neskowin.linfield.edu
>> 250-PIPELINING
>> 250-SIZE 1500
>> 250-VRFY
>> 250-ETRN
>> 250-XXXA
>
> Firewall SMTP "fixup" that bre
Hi,
I am searching for a dynamic mapping solution which allows me to
forward emails to every...@example.com to all valid mailboxes in
example.com
I did not find any dynamic mapping solution for this.
I am almost there, the only thing left is to validate that %u =
everyone.
My current accomplishme
Noel Jones a écrit :
> On 3/15/2010 7:58 PM, roger pedrol wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Maybe not related to postfix but Ubuntu dpkg but trying to install SPF I
>> came across this problem:
>>
>> Configuring postfix (2.5.1-2ubuntu1.2) ...
>>
>> Running newaliases
>> postalias: fatal: can't create maps vi
Vegard Svanberg a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute
> force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound
> spam.
>
> The best idea we've come up with so far is to perform outbound spam
> filtering following these rules (i
ram a écrit :
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 15:40 +0100, Vegard Svanberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we are trying to mitigate the impact of having infected users, brute
>> force hacked webmail accounts etc. sending (larging amounts of) outbound
>> spam.
>>
>> The best idea we've come up with so far is to perfo
Greetings,
I'm using Postfix with MySQL, and am trying to restrict certain users to
send and receive from my network only. I have had marginal success with
this using a MySQL query.
In the MySQL table, these users have 'local_only' in the smtp_access
column, all other users have 'Y' in this
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Ronie Gilberto Henrich
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf
>
> virtual_alias_maps = ldap:everyone
>
> everyone_server_host = ldaps://localhost
> everyone_version = 3
> everyone_search_base = ou=%d,ou=Mail,o=example,c=com
> everyone_query_filt
Hi,
I have a small question about anvil: every now and then it logs three
lines about statistics. I don't quite understand what they mean. This is
an example:
Mar 17 00:30:49 mx postfix/anvil[28510]: statistics: max connection rate
1/60s for (mx.mydomain.eu:smtp:168.100.1.7) at Mar 17 00:27:28
Ma
I am trying to get delay warnings to be sent to users with no success.
I've set the delay_warning_time to one hour. If I send a message to
an address know to be having problem it gets queued and I can see
there is a warning_message_time:
$ sudo postcat -q 834B2800B|grep warning_message_time
warn
Stephen Carville:
> I am trying to get delay warnings to be sent to users with no success.
How do you know the difference between "not sent" and "not received"?
Wietse
Hi Reinaldo,
Let me explain better how virtual_alias_maps works in this case:
1) Someone send an email to every...@example.com
2) Query ldap:everyone result has to be us...@example.com,
us...@example.com, and so on (all mailboxes in domain example.com)
So, the %u value in everyone_query_filter is
On 03/16/2010 08:13 AM, Aaron Roberts wrote:
Aaron Roberts:
Hi all,
Can anyone suggest a way to force all NDRs generated by
the bounce daemon to be delivered by a particular transport?
Wietse Venema:
You need to solve the right problem. Eliminate the reason why those
bounce me
44 matches
Mail list logo
