* froinds J :
> What should I use keylength and digest when creating both the CA cert and
> the smtpd cert?
That's an invitation for long discussions...
In Germany, the federal institution "BSI" (administration for security),
recommends 4096 Bit for CA certificates and > 2048 for server certifica
Questions similar to yours come up fairly often, I'm not sure why
noone's jumped in yet with a rough solution that will do what you
want. What you've mentioned you want:
> How do I ensure that my mail server can only send mails either to or
> from mydomains?
Consider that there are three situatio
* Michael :
> In reference to the following page:
> http://dkimproxy.sourceforge.net/postfix-outbound-howto.html
>
> it includes the following:
> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o conte
* Stefan Foerster :
> I _think_ (and I'm really not 100% sure if this would work) another
> possibility would be to use a feature introduced with Postfix 2.7,
> namely sender_dependent_default_transport_maps. You could define a
> transport which passes all mail to the DKIM proxy. The proxy itself
>
Thx for the reply
> Questions similar to yours come up fairly often, I'm not sure why
> noone's jumped in yet with a rough solution that will do what you
> want. What you've mentioned you want:
>
>> How do I ensure that my mail server can only send mails either to or
>> from mydomains?
>
> I *thin
Michael a écrit :
> In reference to the following page:
> http://dkimproxy.sourceforge.net/postfix-outbound-howto.html
>
> it includes the following:
> submission inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o smtpd_etrn_restrictions=reject
> -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
> -o
I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . With this configuration, I am
down to under 10 spams a day. Looking at my backend server which is
exchange 2007, I find that all of the remaining spam messages have
spam confidence level o
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:02:32 -0500
> Von: Roman Gelfand
> An: postfix users list
> Betreff: anti spam measures
> I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
> grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . With this configuration, I a
>> I *think* the short, correct answer is to use a policy server:
>> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
> I will look into those then
I read into http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html, but I do
not see how I can use this to solve my problem.
Perhaps I am missing something...
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 10:02:32 -0500
>> Von: Roman Gelfand
>> An: postfix users list
>> Betreff: anti spam measures
>
>> I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
>> grossd, dkim
Serge Fonville:
> >> I *think* the short, correct answer is to use a policy server:
> >> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html
> > I will look into those then
> I read into http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html, but I do
> not see how I can use this to solve my problem.
> Perhap
Wietse,
Thx for the reply
> The policy server can reject mail from a remote network with a
> local sender address.
>
> Isn't that what you want?
>
> As an added bonus, it can also reject mail from a local network
> with a remote sender address. This can help to stop outbound spam
> from zombie-in
Hello list,
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
R.
--
___
It is bett
* richard lucassen :
> I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
> can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
> higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
Chosse a client/write a script that breaks the list of 3.000 recipients
richard lucassen wrote:
Hello list,
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
Yes. Install a proper mailing list management system, such
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:02:32AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
> I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
> grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . With this configuration, I am
> down to under 10 spams a day. Looking at my backend server which is
> exchange 2007, I fi
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:50:21 +0100
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * richard lucassen :
> > I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
> > recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
> > smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to higher limits, but is there a
> > better way to handle this
richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
Mark Goodge wrote:
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to higher limits, but is there a
better way to handle this?
Yes. Install a
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:14:03PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
> Mark Goodge wrote:
>
> > > I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
> > > recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
> > > smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to higher limi
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:23:50PM +, Mark Goodge wrote:
> richard lucassen wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
>> Mark Goodge wrote:
I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
smtpd_recipient_overshoot_lim
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:50:26 -0500
> Von: Roman Gelfand
> An: Steve
> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Steve wrote:
> >
> > Original-Nachricht
> >> Datum: Sun, 3 Jan 20
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:57:41 +
Mark Goodge wrote:
> > I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000
> > recipients. I can set smtpd_recipient_limit and
> > smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to higher limits, but is there a
> > better way to handle this?
>
> Yes. Install a proper m
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
[mlm]
> I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
> option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
> reputation when there is a delivery problem. For example, when using
> the aliases option,
richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
[mlm]
I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
reputation when there is a delivery problem. For example, when using
richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
[mlm]
I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
reputation when there is a delivery problem. For example, when using
* richard lucassen :
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
> Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>
> [mlm]
>
> > I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better
> > option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail
> > reputation when there is a delivery problem. For exam
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:58:15PM +1100, Barney Desmond wrote:
> > mynetworks = 0.0.0.0
> This is *definitely* very wrong! smtpd_recipient_restrictions will
> allow ANY client in mynetworks to relay mail to any destination. I
While it was intended, no doubt, to be very wrong, it failed. Lacking
a
--
From: "Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz"
Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 4:13 PM
To:
Subject: Re: 3000 recipients
richard lucassen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
[mlm]
I will second that using a real MLM is u
On Jan 3, 2010, at 1:14 PM, richard lucassen wrote:
>> 3000 recipients is waaay too many to do in a single
>> shot using Bcc.
>
> Ok, but a mlm is quite some overkill IMHO, just wondering if there was
> an intermediate solution. This is for a blind person who handles the
> "mailinglist" him
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:02:32AM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>> I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
>> grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . With this configuration, I am
>> down to under 10 spams a day
* Glenn English :
>
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 1:14 PM, richard lucassen wrote:
>
> >> 3000 recipients is waaay too many to do in a single
> >> shot using Bcc.
> >
> > Ok, but a mlm is quite some overkill IMHO, just wondering if there was
> > an intermediate solution. This is for a blind person w
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Steve wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:50:26 -0500
>> Von: Roman Gelfand
>> An: Steve
>> CC: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
>
>> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Steve wrote:
>> >
>> >
Roman Gelfand a écrit :
> I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
> grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . With this configuration, I am
> down to under 10 spams a day. Looking at my backend server which is
> exchange 2007, I find that all of the remaining spam messa
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:37:18 +0100
> Von: mouss
> An: postfix users list
> Betreff: Re: anti spam measures
> Roman Gelfand a écrit :
> > I am running postfix with anti spam filter (policyd-weight, sqlgrey,
> > grossd, dkim, senderid-milter, dspam) . W
Hi Wietse.
The following could be another case were the scripts you've mentioned
create incorrect links:
http://www.postfix.org/MAILDROP_README.html#direct links in the first
sentence with the word maildrop to
http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#maildrop_queue . But I think
the word
Roman Gelfand put forth on 1/3/2010 3:44 PM:
> I do train DSPAM and it works great. However, if I could block it
> before it gets to DSPAM, why not. I wouldn't feel bad if exchange
> told me this is perfectly good email. I am, looking, to do away with
> exchange server altogether.
Is managing
I have not been able to get any message other then "Client did not present a
certificate" in message headers despite loading a Commodo email certificate
in to Kmail.
postconf -n
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
body_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/pcre_body_checks
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
comman
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 20:37 +0100, richard lucassen wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I want to send once a week a simple mail to a list of 3000 recipients. I
> can set smtpd_recipient_limit and smtpd_recipient_overshoot_limit to
> higher limits, but is there a better way to handle this?
>
> R.
>
Do thes
On Jan 3, 2010, at 13:14, richard lucassen
wrote:
but a mlm is quite some overkill IMHO
An mlm is certainly not overkill for 3,000 recipients.
39 matches
Mail list logo
