Hi all
I am about to upgrade a production server to Postfix 2.6.5.-1 (from RPM)
( Red Hat EL 5 )
What is the proper way to achieve a smooth upgrade?
Thanks in advance
Dimitrios
--
ΔΗΜΗΤΡΙΟΣ ΚΑΡΑΠΙΠΕΡΗΣ
ΤΕΧΝ. ΥΠ. ΣΥΖΕΥΞΙΣ
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ - Ν. ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ
ΔΗΜΟΣ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ - Δ/ΝΣΗ ΟΡΓΑΝ
? ???:
> Hi all
> I am about to upgrade a production server to Postfix 2.6.5.-1 (from RPM)
> ( Red Hat EL 5 )
>
> What is the proper way to achieve a smooth upgrade?
1-Read the RELEASE_NOTES file for incompatible changes that may affect
your configuration.
2-Stop Postfix. LEAVE T
Hi.
I'm looking for having multiple domains, for multiple users, being
droped in the same maildirectory.
I was using a mysql alias_maps but I guess it's wrong as it is
normally only for local domains. I don't want to have any conflict
with local users and e-mails addresses for the virtual domains
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> You might want to put together a build environment and roll your own. I tend
> to do this for a lot of software (as I need to application specific business
> required patches to several packages). In most cases, you can easily se
On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Carlos Williams
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Gary Smith
wrote:
Carlos,
You might want to put together a build environment and roll your
own. I tend to do this for a lot of software (as I need to
application specific business required patches to
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list
things once)?
Yes, exactly.
-- Noel Jones
This raises a question for me...
If all the checks
On 9/18/2009 10:41 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list
things once)?
Yes, exactly.
-- Noel Jones
This raises a questio
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/18/2009 10:41 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list
things once)?
Yes, exactly.
-- Noel Jones
Th
Hi,
Does anybody know which are the valid values for debug_peer_level parameter?
Thanks a lot.
--
Bernardo Pons
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 06:36:15PM +0200, Bernardo Pons wrote:
> Does anybody know which are the valid values for debug_peer_level parameter?
The default of "2" is almost always good enough. You could try "1" for
a somewhat less verbose debug log.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list follow
On 9/18/2009 11:25 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/18/2009 10:41 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to list
things once)?
Is there a limit to how many check_*_access hash, pcre, regex files you
can have under a given restriction in postfix 2.3?
Not specifically client_restrictions but this is the general idea:
main.cf:
smtpd_client_restrictions=
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/reject_by_ip
check_client_acces
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/18/2009 11:25 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/18/2009 10:41 AM, VR wrote:
Noel Jones wrote:
On 9/15/2009 11:01 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Ahhh, is this one of the reasons some folks put 'all' of their
restrictions under smtpd_recipient_restrictions (only have to lis
VR wrote:
> Is there a limit to how many check_*_access hash, pcre, regex files
> you can have under a given restriction in postfix 2.3?
>
> Not specifically client_restrictions but this is the general idea:
>
> main.cf:
> smtpd_client_restrictions=
> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/reject_by
VR wrote:
> I don't grasp how
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions=
> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_client
> check_helo_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_helo
>
> can equate to less whitelisting than:
>
> smtpd_client_restrictions=
> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/access_client
>
>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Eduardo Júnior:
>> and I have some doubts.
>> This:
>> "With Postfix 2.4 and later, a message is returned as either message/rfc822
>> (the complete original) or as text/rfc822-headers (the headers only)"
>>
>> does means that if my pos
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Bernardo Pons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know which are the valid values for debug_peer_level parameter?
>
> Thanks a lot.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#debug_peer_list
[]'s
--
Eduardo Júnior
GNU/Linux user #423272
:wq
Wietse Venema:
> Postfix VSTREAMs automatically flush output on the next read
> operation; a lot of things depend on this, including the SMTP client
> and SMTP server protocol implementations. This is how Postfix avoids
> sending silly little network packets.
>
> In the case of skipping Milter rep
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Fabien Penso wrote:
> I'm looking for having multiple domains, for multiple users, being
> droped in the same maildirectory.
>
> I was using a mysql alias_maps but I guess it's wrong as it is
> normally only for local domains. I don't want to have any conflict
> with local us
My server is getting a lot of spam that appears to be claiming it's from my
domain while it's from elsewhere:
Received:
from my.ip.addr.ess (124-12-9-193.static.tfn.net.tw [124.12.9.193])
by mydomain.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 56BEC6010B for ;
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:55:54 -0600 (MDT)
Received:
Gerry Gam a écrit :
> My server is getting a lot of spam that appears to be claiming it's from my
> domain while it's from elsewhere:
>
> Received:
> from my.ip.addr.ess (124-12-9-193.static.tfn.net.tw [124.12.9.193])
reject mail if helo is your IP.
check_helo_access cidr:/etc/postf
VR a écrit :
> Is there a limit to how many check_*_access hash, pcre, regex files you
> can have under a given restriction in postfix 2.3?
>
> Not specifically client_restrictions but this is the general idea:
>
> main.cf:
> smtpd_client_restrictions=
> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/reje
Hi all
Hi list
Following a crash of postfix,
I posed the following question:
email for emission
it takes a field A on the dns server ?
SL
'Buddha' peace themselve
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Eduardo Júnior wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Bernardo Pons
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anybody know which are the valid values for debug_peer_level
> > parameter?
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#debug_peer_list
Eduardo, what is
24 matches
Mail list logo