/dev/rob0 escribió:
On Friday 11 September 2009 20:43:47 mic...@casa.co.cu wrote:
>> Turns out I use a webmail (horde) in my workplace but
>> apparently has a bug, somehow are generating large numbers of
>> messages to various servers on the internet, yahoo, aol,
>> hotmail and others. to keep
Hi,
I'm pretty sure about this but... I prefer asking for being totally
sure. Hey mates imagine a policy daemon has a (server time limit) time
limit of 3600 seconds... like hasn't arrived the max_idle time...
spawn doesn't close it and now it's near to it's time_limit
imagine that
Seth Mattinen:
> Multiline responses in SMTP are (as far as I know) not allowed. I'm sure
> Wietse will correct me it I'm wrong, but I can't ever recall it.
They are allowed. In fact, most EHLO server responses are multi-line.
Wietse
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pretty sure about this but... I prefer asking for being totally
> sure. Hey mates imagine a policy daemon has a (server time limit) time
> limit of 3600 seconds... like hasn't arrived the max_idle time...
> spawn doesn't close it and now it's near
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Mike Cappella wrote:
Most log messages in postfix-logwatch are either canonicalized or
summarized. In this case, the message summary change was an attempt
at being a little more clear, (but perhaps its not).
It's great ... when timesSeen > 1.
The canonicaliza
I have resent this message to just Wietse... but I wanted to send it
to whole mailing list. So I do.
When you are running the policy service under the spawn daemon:
1) The time limit BEGINS after an SMTP server connects to the
policy server port, when a new policy daemon process is crea
Hello,
I'm running postfix 2.5.9 on CentOS 5.3. I'm also running
amavisd-new 2.6.4. I'm wanting to implement dkim. I've got the key already
published in dns.
I was originally thinking smtpd proxy and had set up dkimproxy, but
that required opening up port 587 and changing my existi
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
> >> When you are running the policy service under the spawn daemon:
> >>
> >> 1) The time limit BEGINS after an SMTP server connects to the
> >> policy server port, when a new policy daemon process is created.
> >> Thus, an SMTP server always "mates" with a policy se
Mike Cappella:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 9/11/09 5:57 PM, ghe wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 11, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> >>> Also since I didn't find it, I just re-postmapped 'em all.
> >>
> >> Postfix includes the name of the file that is out-of-date:
> >>
El 12/09/2009, a las 15:38, Wietse Venema escribió:
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
When you are running the policy service under the spawn daemon:
1) The time limit BEGINS after an SMTP server connects to the
policy server port, when a new policy daemon process is created.
Thus, an SMTP server
On Sep 12, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Mike Cappella:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On 9/11/09 5:57 PM, ghe wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Also since I didn't find it, I just re-postmapped 'em all.
Postfix includes the name of the
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
> > Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre:
> When you are running the policy service under the spawn daemon:
>
> 1) The time limit BEGINS after an SMTP server connects to the
> policy server port, when a new policy daemon process is created.
> Thus, an SMTP
Hello,
I had a question regarding forged mail. I wanted to know if it was
possible for Postfix for
postfix to check the integrity of incoming emails?
What I mean by this is, if a malicious attacker send an email from
dam...@hotmail.com is
there anyway to check that the email came from hotmail.com
Hi,
I am getting this error.
Sep 11 18:45:47 (none) mail.info postfix/smtp[2326]: 1BE1EF67: to=<
n...@gmail.com>, relay=none, delay=10709, delays=10709/0.3/0.01/0,
dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service
error for name=gmail.com type=MX: Host
nslookup gmail.com gi
One way, albiet expensive on CPU util is reject_unverified_sender.
Sends probes to determine if address is valid before accepting
delivery. Very effective but if a very busy system you will want to
limit it's use. Also exceptions will need to be made for noreply type
senders, otherwise man
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, girish br wrote:
> Sep 11 18:45:47 (none) mail.info postfix/smtp[2326]: 1BE1EF67: to=<
> n...@gmail.com>, relay=none, delay=10709, delays=10709/0.3/0.01/0,
> dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service
> error for name=gmail.com type=MX: Host
>
> n
girish br:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting this error.
>
> Sep 11 18:45:47 (none) mail.info postfix/smtp[2326]: 1BE1EF67: to=<
> n...@gmail.com>, relay=none, delay=10709, delays=10709/0.3/0.01/0,
> dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service
> error for name=gmail.com type=MX:
In my master.cf all options are set to "n" which is by default. But I am
running postfix as superuser (root).
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, girish br wrote:
>
> > Sep 11 18:45:47 (none) mail.info postfix/smtp[2326]: 1BE1EF67: to=<
> > n...@gmail.co
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, girish br wrote:
> In my master.cf all options are set to "n" which is by default. But I am
> running postfix as superuser (root).
Just to be sure, can you post the output of:
% grep '^smtp.*smtpd' /path/to/master.cf
--
Sahil Tandon
On 9/12/2009 5:34 AM, ghe wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Mike Cappella wrote:
Most log messages in postfix-logwatch are either canonicalized or
summarized. In this case, the message summary change was an attempt at
being a little more clear, (but perhaps its not).
It's great ... when ti
On 9/12/2009 6:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
I think that it is a mistake to replace the specific
warning: database /etc/postfix/client_checks.db is older than
source file /etc/postfix/client_checks
By the generic
Database file needs update
Because it keeps the reader in the
Hi List,
I'm interested in testing several anti-spam systems (using postfix as my
mta). I'd like to perform some real-time testing with live data, so
I've had a thought to 'split' or 'mirror' the incoming SMTP stream to
several servers. Server 1 would be my regular mail setup, server 2
wou
On 9/12/2009 1:00 PM, James Hankins wrote:
> One way, albiet expensive on CPU util is reject_unverified_sender.
> Sends probes to determine if address is valid before accepting
> delivery.
Careful... applying Sender Verification to all inbound mail is a form of
abuse and will eventually get you on
Paul Cockings:
> Hi List,
>
> I'm interested in testing several anti-spam systems (using postfix as my
> mta). I'd like to perform some real-time testing with live data, so
> I've had a thought to 'split' or 'mirror' the incoming SMTP stream to
> several servers. Server 1 would be my regular
* Steve Heaven :
>
> We have upgraded our system this morning from
> postfix 2.2.2
> saslauthd 2.1.20
>
> to
> postfix 2.3.3
> saslauthd 2.1.22
>
> We now find that the sasl realm is not being handled as before.
> We use imap authentication and sasl is now trying to make an imap login
> using
This is my output for: %grep '^smtp.*smtpd' master.cf
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, girish br wrote:
>
> > In my master.cf all options are set to "n" which is by default. But I am
> > running postfix as superuser (root).
girish br:
> This is my output for: %grep '^smtp.*smtpd' master.cf
>
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
I recall that you had a problem SENDING mail, in which case
the proper line to look for would be the SMTP client:
grep '^smtp.*smtp' master.cf | grep -v smtpd
In addition, for DNS lookup to
On Saturday 12 September 2009 13:19:19 Mike Cappella wrote:
> To me, this:
>
>97 *Warning: Database file needs update
>
>80 /etc/postfix/virtual
>17 /etc/postfix/transport
>
> looks better and reads easier than
Hi all,
Postfix 2.5.5 on Debian Lenny. I'm able to do LDAP lookups (to Active
Directory) and get the response I expect, but I don't understand why
mail is still bouncing with 'Unknown user' after the SMTP RCPT TO is
given the OK.
ccimap:/etc/postfix# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
All,
I want to set up a postfix server which only takes traffic from
'mynetworks'.For N out M IP addresses, the postfix server must
reject_unauth_destination.Pretty simple so far...
However, for a select few IP addresses in the list, I want the postfix serverto
behave differently. I want to enf
Yes, I have problem in sending part. I could retrieve mails from other
servers.
grep '^smtp.*smtp' master.cf | grep -v smtpd gives me
smtp unix - - n - - smtp
All the directory you mentioned have world execute permission and file have
world read permission.
I run the strace as mentioned in DEBU
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 02:47:09AM +, George Forman wrote:
> I want to set up a postfix server which only takes traffic from
> 'mynetworks'.
No, a set of clients, authorized to access your server, but not fully
trusted to e.g. relay, hence not "mynetworks".
> For N out M IP addresses, the p
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 03:18:52AM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Postfix 2.5.5 on Debian Lenny. I'm able to do LDAP lookups (to Active
> Directory) and get the response I expect, but I don't understand why
> mail is still bouncing with 'Unknown user' after the SMTP RCPT TO is
> given t
"Dave" writes:
> Hello,
> I'm running postfix 2.5.9 on CentOS 5.3. I'm also running
> amavisd-new 2.6.4. I'm wanting to implement dkim.
> [...]
> # signing domain selector private key options # -
> -- --
> dkim_key('example.com', 'selector'
Hello,
I just setup the postfix server and everything works fine except the
aliases. Whenever I send to an aliases email, I got the following
error message back. Some how, postfix adds an (.) period before the
domain. Does anyone know how can I remove the (dot) before the domain?
Thanks!
bad r
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, c cc wrote:
> I just setup the postfix server and everything works fine except the
> aliases. Whenever I send to an aliases email, I got the following
> error message back. Some how, postfix adds an (.) period before the
> domain. Does anyone know how can I remove the (dot)
36 matches
Mail list logo
