On Saturday 12 September 2009 13:19:19 Mike Cappella wrote:
> To me, this:
>
> 97 *Warning: Database file needs update
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 80 /etc/postfix/virtual
> 17 /etc/postfix/transport
>
> looks better and reads easier than this:
>
> Warnings
> --------
> cleanup (total: 16)
> 16 database /etc/postfix/virtual.db is older than source file
> /etc...
> smtpd (total: 47)
> 47 database /etc/postfix/virtual.db is older than source file
> /etc...
> trivial-rewrite (total: 34)
> 17 database /etc/postfix/virtual.db is older than source file
> /etc...
> 17 database /etc/postfix/transport.db is older than source
> file /e...
Agreed, but why not this? To wit:
97 *Warning: Database is older than source file
--------------------------------------------------------
80 /etc/postfix/virtual
17 /etc/postfix/transport
> Anyway, this is likely way off topic, so perhaps this can be pushed
> over to the postfix-logwatch list for further discussions.
Just a suggestion, since I'm not a postfix-logwatch user, I won't be
joining your list.
--
Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
"/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
