We have a basic distribution list setup within postfix under a virtual
domain.
One of the external parties who wants to sent to it has an SPF record in
place so of course in its current configuration the message is being
rejected by our SPF, and of course even if we allowed it, it would be
rejecte
On Thursday 20 August 2009 10:01:37 Paul Hutchings wrote:
> We have a basic distribution list setup within postfix under a virtual
> domain.
>
> One of the external parties who wants to sent to it has an SPF record in
> place so of course in its current configuration the message is being
> rejected
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to implement a mail filtering, which should put all SPAM
tagged messages into a dedicated folder. It looks simple, but then PLESK
comes in. It uses:
virtual_transport = plesk_virtual
which looks like this in master.cf:
plesk_virtual unix - n n - -
Dear all , i have a big problem with postfx queue. I'm using postfix
amavis spamassain. But queue has 5 mails. it's sending very slow.
What Can i do ? Thanks.
Postconf -n
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
body_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/body_checks
bounce_queue_lifetime = 3d
broken_sasl_auth_cl
I have detect the problem
All emails above @de.opel.com address is hidden addres but my domain hidden
addres appear in orig_to from maillog.
What do I to hidden address appear in mail header?
-> Subject: Re: postfix original recipient
Ok
"Postfix logs the orig_to address when the enve
Hallo Junior,
* Junior Tux :
> Dear all , i have a big problem with postfx queue. I'm using postfix
> amavis spamassain. But queue has 5 mails. it's sending very slow.
> What Can i do ? Thanks.
There are various ways to debug this problem and improve performance.
A first stop should be http:/
On second thought,
* Junior Tux :
> qmgr_clog_warn_time = 0
you might want to leave that at the default value to get helpful
information.
> smtpd_milters = inet:localhost:10026
This milter could be a problem if it is slow.
> soft_bounce = yes
On a prodcution machine, this will increase the l
2009/8/14 Barney Desmond
> 2009/8/14 Ebbe Hjorth :
> > No more hints? :-(
>
> Do you still have a problem? You said, "Ahh, now we are talkin", which
> sounds like you were successful.
>
> Patrick's docs (
> http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/smtpauth/postfix_tls_support.html
> )
> ar
Gaby L:
> Ok
> "Postfix logs the orig_to address when the envelope recipient address
> is replaced (for example with virtual_alias_maps)."
> The email is send to do_ch...@de.opel.com (Envelope)but in orig_to is
> a.verme...@autoglobus2000.ro
> Why not appear real delivery address in message? (al
Junior Tux:
> Dear all , i have a big problem with postfx queue. I'm using postfix
> amavis spamassain. But queue has 5 mails. it's sending very slow.
> What Can i do ? Thanks.
The first thing you should do is search the logfile for signs of
trouble that causes programs to fail.
http://www.po
Hello all,
It is my first time configuring postfix and I've learned a lot the past couple
of days from the community, thank you.
My problem is in receiving mail, it doesn't have a problem sending out test
mails from the Linux command prompt (using: echo "test" | mail -s testsubject
testem...@h
No their SPF config works as they want it. I think perhaps mentioning
SPF was a red herring, what I really want to know is how I can have a
distribution list in a Postfix Virtual Domain that sends with the
envelope (if that's the term) set to something we control and not using
the senders domain/e
My scenario:
I have a lot of postfix servers, each one, use to sent mail directly
to internet, so It's difficult to monitor them.
What I want?
Put all postfix's of my servers to send all their external mail to an
smarthost server in my network. I mean, the smarthost must receive
ONLY mail from
Well,
To determine you are an opne relay, there are a couple of things you can do
Google for open relay check
>From a remote site send an email from another domain to another domain
through your mail server
Check your settings agains the manual
HTH
Regards,
Serge Fonville
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009
- Original Message -
From: Brian Evans - Postfix List
To: Postfix users
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:41:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Special needs(filter - SASL)
> none none wrote:
> > I would like email to be filtered ONLY from user that relays(SASL
> > authed) mail to the outside(not localhost)
Israel Garcia wrote:
My scenario:
I have a lot of postfix servers, each one, use to sent mail directly
to internet, so It's difficult to monitor them.
What I want?
Put all postfix's of my servers to send all their external mail to an
smarthost server in my network. I mean, the smarthost must
Israel Garcia wrote:
Yes, I did it, I put all my servers IPs inside mynetworks at
main.cf...BUT I noticed that a user from any server can send mail
using any sender and it's a big problem, because any user can send
spam inside my network to Internet.. How can I block this user from
sending m
Serge, I mean I'm an open relay to my servers, becasue any user from
any server can send mail putting any sender..I'm looking a way to
block that...
regards,
Israel.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Serge Fonville wrote:
> Well,
>
> To determine you are an opne relay, there are a couple of things
My bad,
I misunderstood the question, skimmed to the msg to fast ;-)
Sorry 'bout that
As mentioned read the section on mynetworks
Regards,
Serge Fonville
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Israel Garcia wrote:
> Serge, I mean I'm an open relay to my servers, becasue any user from
> any server c
This is the postconf -n on my smarthost server.
server:/etc/postfix# postconf -n
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
inet_interfaces = all
mailbox_size_limit = 1024000
mydestination =
myhostname = server.domain
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 xx.xx.xx.xx #<-- my.network.s
Paul Hutchings wrote:
No their SPF config works as they want it. I think perhaps mentioning
SPF was a red herring, what I really want to know is how I can have a
distribution list in a Postfix Virtual Domain that sends with the
envelope (if that's the term) set to something we control and not us
Israel Garcia wrote:
This is the postconf -n on my smarthost server.
server:/etc/postfix# postconf -n
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
inet_interfaces = all
mailbox_size_limit = 1024000
mydestination =
myhostname = server.domain
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 xx.xx.x
Paul H Park wrote:
Hello all,
It is my first time configuring postfix and I've learned a lot the past couple
of days from the community, thank you.
My problem is in receiving mail, it doesn't have a problem sending out test mails from
the Linux command prompt (using: echo "test" | mail -s tes
The Doctor wrote:
> Right I have the following colocated box with
> the following configuration:
>
>
> $postconf -n
>
> mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail
> mailbox_transport = cyrus
>
mailbox_transport takes precidence over mailbox_command.. so procmail is
never called by Postfix
> relayhost
Vytenis Sabaliauskas wrote:
> This transport should be left intact. I'm looking into making a
> separate filter which will deliver the message to the Spam folder if
> it's tagged or pipe it back to postfix to deliver it with
> "plesk_virtual" if it's not.
>
> Are there any thoughts how to implement
Israel Garcia wrote:
This is the postconf -n on my smarthost server.
server:/etc/postfix# postconf -n
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
inet_interfaces = all
mailbox_size_limit = 1024000
mydestination =
myhostname = server.domain
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 xx.xx.x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brent Robinson said the following on 20/08/09 16:37:
> Do we need to upgrade or recompile Postfix in order for it to work
> correctly with MySql 5?
You should, since Postfix uses MySQL libraries and include files.
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
+--[Luigi Rosa
On tor 20 aug 2009 11:19:57 CEST, Simon Waters wrote
I think SPF is broken by design, but if you aren't rewriting the email, then
yes mailing list software will do that for you.
spf brokken ?, it brokken as much as spam filters using blacklists and
not whitelists, seriously if it was whitelis
At Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:31:45 -0500,
AMP Admin wrote:
>
> We have the following setup for dkimproxy but it's only signing with dkim
> and not domainkey. We would like to do both. Any ideas?
Use sender_map.conf ;;
--
I'm not sure how to use sender_map.conf. can you give me an example or point
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Byung-Hee HWANG
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:21 PM
To: AMP Admin
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: domainkey
At Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:31:45 -0500,
AMP Admin wrote:
Please stop the top-posting.
On Thursday 20 August 2009 09:09:34 Israel Garcia wrote:
> This is the postconf -n on my smarthost server.
> myhostname = server.domain
Typically myhostname should be a real DNS name, resolvable from
outside, and should also be the valus of the PTR for the IP address
Ok, new problem.
Sender: i...@example.com
dkim: Does work
Domainkey: Does work
Sender: i...@differentdomain.com
Dkim: Does work
Domainkey: Does NOT work
Our sender map looks like this:
# sign i...@differentdomain.com
i...@differentdomain.comdkim(d=example.com), domainkeys(d=example.com)
I have a domain split on two postfix servers. The secondary (not the default)
hosts only a few email accounts so I added them to the transport map:
off...@domainchanged.com dovecot:
o...@domainchanged.comdovecot:
reu...@domainchanged.com dovecot:
...
This works for local deliv
Thanks for the reply.
Can I do this with Postfix and if so, how please?
I did read the address-rewriting help but frankly am struggling to find the
exact details I need.
This is literally the only distribution list that we have on Postfix and it
only has a handful of members so I really don't
On Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 19:21 CEST,
David Koski wrote:
> I have a domain split on two postfix servers. The secondary (not the
> default) hosts only a few email accounts so I added them to the
> transport map:
>
> off...@domainchanged.com dovecot:
> o...@domainchanged.com
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:08:16PM +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
> On Thursday, August 20, 2009 at 19:21 CEST,
> David Koski wrote:
>
> > I have a domain split on two postfix servers. The secondary (not the
> > default) hosts only a few email accounts so I added them to the
> > transport map:
check your server: http://www.mxtoolbox.com/
are you server open relay? You must use smtp autenticate.
2009/8/20 Israel Garcia :
> My scenario:
>
> I have a lot of postfix servers, each one, use to sent mail directly
> to internet, so It's difficult to monitor them.
> What I want?
>
> Put
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:32 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Please stop the top-posting.
OK, I'm sorry.
>
> On Thursday 20 August 2009 09:09:34 Israel Garcia wrote:
>> This is the postconf -n on my smarthost server.
>
>> myhostname = server.domain
DONE!
>
> Typically myhostname should be a real DNS name
Paul Hutchings wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Can I do this with Postfix and if so, how please?
Control From: header and envelope sender from whatever
software submits the mail to postfix.
-- Noel Jones
I did read the address-rewriting help but frankly am struggling to find the
exact de
Paul Hutchings a écrit :
> We have a basic distribution list setup within postfix under a virtual
> domain.
>
> One of the external parties who wants to sent to it has an SPF record in
> place so of course in its current configuration the message is being
> rejected by our SPF, and of course even
Paul Hutchings escreveu:
This is literally the only distribution list that we have on Postfix and it
only has a handful of members so I really don't want to have to start looking
at listserv software just for that.
why not that would be the correct way of handling a
distribution l
Hello,
I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
disable that and activate them in spamassassin? Suggestions welcome.
Hi Dave,
> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
> disable that and activate them in spamassassin? Suggestions
> > I am wondering if anyone has advice on where there are any email health
> checks online. I used to use dnsstuff.com but they have since gone
> commercial.
>
> You have been given links and other suggestions for this that are sound, I
> would
> follow those suggestions.
>
> > It's fru
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > * email builder :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am wondering if anyone has advice on where there are any email
> > > health checks online. I used to use dnsstuff.com but they have since
> > > gone commercial.
> >
> > MXtoolbox
> http://www.mxtoolbox.com/eom/index.asp
Hi,
I have been using an older version of postfix on a relay server for
quite a few years now, without any real incident. It accepts mail from
one or two other servers and forwards it on to an internal Exchange
server on the same network. It handles about 250k messages per day.
It's configured wit
Hi,
This is just a wild guess...
> I'm also pretty sure it's not a network issue. After passing
> billions of packets there isn't a single error. I'm also pretty sure
> DNS is configured properly.
Have you checked the connection between postfix and the exchange
machines? After some years, a cabl
On Thursday 20 August 2009 22:56:31 Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
> > postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have
> > some rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or
> > should i disab
> > This is a difficult question.
> I disagree.
Just that because you disagree makes the question not simple :)
> 2. Gmail is not squeaky clean, it's no surprise that they end up in
Of course, but then it gets people complaining why they cannot receive
mails from gmail.
> 5. A reject_rbl_clien
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:38:42AM -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> > Right I have the following colocated box with
> > the following configuration:
> >
> >
> > $postconf -n
> >
> > mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail
> > mailbox_transport = cyrus
> >
>
> mailbox_t
I'm setting up SASL with TLS for remote clients. As an additional
security measure, I would like the server to ask the email clients to
present their client certificates. According to the docs, this is
accomplished with:
smtpd_tls_ask_ccert = yes
But there are some ominous warnings about brok
2009/8/21 Florin Andrei :
> I'm setting up SASL with TLS for remote clients. As an additional security
> measure, I would like the server to ask the email clients to present their
> client certificates. According to the docs, this is accomplished with:
>
> smtpd_tls_ask_ccert = yes
If you intend t
52 matches
Mail list logo
