Re: Log Stats

2009-08-16 Thread LuKreme
On 26-Jun-2009, at 09:28, Jiří Hlinka wrote: beside pflogsumm there is postfix-logwatch and amavis-logwatch: http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/ Sorry for pulling a post out of the wayback machine, but how do people through multiple logs at posftix-logwatch when they are compressed? all m

Re: Removing Headers

2009-08-16 Thread mouss
Eduardo Júnior a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote: >> No, so you need to craft a more precise expression. The look of the >> Received: header you want to remove is very well-known, so it should >> be quite easy to craft a suitable expression. > > > ok, but there is ano

HELO/EHLO rejection rate

2009-08-16 Thread LuKreme
I looked at the various rejections for the last 31 days, and I noticed that my unknown/HELO is very very high and my RBL is very very low. 5xx Reject relay denied 0.08% 5xx Reject HELO/EHLO45.97% 5xx Reject DATA 0.01%

Re: Log Stats

2009-08-16 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, LuKreme wrote: > On 26-Jun-2009, at 09:28, Jiří Hlinka wrote: >> beside pflogsumm there is postfix-logwatch and amavis-logwatch: >> http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/ > > Sorry for pulling a post out of the wayback machine, but how do people > through multiple logs at pos

Re: thunderbird 3.0, cram-md5 failing

2009-08-16 Thread mouss
Jay G. Scott a écrit : > Greetings, > > client = thunderbird 3.0 beta 3 > postfix 2.3.3 > linux, host == jgstoy > > doing TLS encryption and authentication. > > windows/thunderbird 2.0.0.22 works > windows/outlook 2003 works > > looking at /var/log/maillog i see that thunderbird 3 is setting >

Re: Some of my Destinations won't work, some do....HUH?

2009-08-16 Thread mouss
Joerg Toellner a écrit : > Hi Postfix-Group, > > [snip] > > THE PROBLEM: > > The former domains work furthermore without problems. But all mails to the > new domains are not accepted and won't land in the appropriate user Maildir > rather they are stored in a "junk" Maildir that i have set up to

Re: redirect to mailbox if listed in spamhaus

2009-08-16 Thread mouss
Melvyn Sopacua a écrit : > On Thursday 13 August 2009 07:22:33 /dev/rob0 wrote: >> On Thursday 13 August 2009 06:17:37 Sahil Tandon wrote: >>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote: I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org To reject mails from s

Re: Log Stats

2009-08-16 Thread LuKreme
On 16-Aug-2009, at 08:25, Sahil Tandon wrote: % bzcat /var/log/maillog.*.bz2 | postfix-logwatch When I did that for 30 days of logs I got a very long pause (20 minutes or so) and then no output at all. I did do it with --detail 1, but detail 1 for the current log, or for un-piped un-compres

postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

2009-08-16 Thread Dave
Hello, I'm trying to figure this one out and it's driving me crazy. I'm running postfix 2.3.3, amavisd-new, spamassassin, and mailman on a CentOS 5.3 box though for this i've taken out amavisd and mailman they are not active. I have two domains on this machine, one example.com that

Re: postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

2009-08-16 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Dave wrote: > I have two domains on this machine, one example.com that is a > virtual mailbox domain holds all users, the other a local domain in > mydestination called lists.example.com a subdomain is for mailman use. From > what i'm seeing in these logs i do not believ

RE: postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

2009-08-16 Thread Dave
Hello, Thanks. The mail is rejected, but it's generating bounce messages, whereas mail to unknown users that smtpd rejects doesn't get queued at all, mail addressed to mailman seems to start through the queue rather than be initially rejected. Thanks. Dave. -Original Message-

Re: postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

2009-08-16 Thread Noel Jones
Dave wrote: Hello, Thanks. The mail is rejected, but it's generating bounce messages, whereas mail to unknown users that smtpd rejects doesn't get queued at all, mail addressed to mailman seems to start through the queue rather than be initially rejected. Thanks. Dave. Please do

strip some information from return path:

2009-08-16 Thread taphy
Hi all, are there any way to remove some information from Return path: header (message received from remote smtp client) ? for example need change: Return-Path: to Return-Path: many thanks for any reply Tatiana -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strip-some-information-fr

Re: strip some information from return path:

2009-08-16 Thread mouss
taphy a écrit : > Hi all, > are there any way to remove some information from Return path: header > (message received from remote smtp client) ? you mean altering the envelope sender? you can use canonical_maps. > for example need change: > Return-Path: > to > Return-Path: > what problem are