Florin Andrei wrote:
> Mikael Bak wrote:
>>
>> Is it really recommended to run a mail server that accepts email from
>> outside with non static IP address?
>>
>> I would not do it.
>
> As long as the dynamic DNS service works well, and the IP address only
> changes very rarely, why not?
>
Hi,
Yo
* email builder :
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if anyone has advice on where there are any email
> health checks online. I used to use dnsstuff.com but they have since
> gone commercial.
MXtoolbox
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * email builder :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering if anyone has advice on where there are any email
> > health checks online. I used to use dnsstuff.com but they have since
> > gone commercial.
>
> MXtoolbox
http://www.mxtoolbox.com/eom/index.aspx
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If I want to accept mails and
relay to an admin email-id , is that possible.
Or should I simply accept all mails and move spamhaus checks to
SpamAssassin and write rules over ther
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:23:17PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> I am not sure if it's the kernel's OOM killer or postfix itself which
> causes it to quit.
1. The OOM killer _always_ uses SIGKILL. A program is not even given the
possibility to react.
2. root processes (like master) have a much l
On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote:
I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If I want to accept mails
and
relay to an admin email-id , is that possible.
Probably with a policy server and the REDIRECT action.
Hi Postfix-Group,
I am new to postfix and the list. And awkwardly i just have to waste your
all time with a maybe simple problem. But i am not able to solve it myself
and i didn't find anything useful while searching in the internet.
THE SITUATION:
I have a Postfix mailserver on Ubuntu that work
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> mail_version = 2.7-20090807
Some more details:
Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: daemon started -- version
2.7-20090807, configuration /etc/postfix
Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: warning: service "smtp" (25)
has reached its process lim
On 8/13/2009, Dabrien 'Dabe' Murphy (d...@parabon.com) wrote:
>> Instead of having to maintain a bazillion different reply parameters,
>> would not it be sufficient to have one generic reply line that
>> gets appended to all those reject commands?
> * Implementing your proposed work-around quickly
Hi,
i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages.
I read in somewhere that this is enough:
-o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers
checks_headers:
^Received: from amavis IGNORE
...
I'd like some references about this subject.
And references about debug level of the daemon
On 8/13/2009 8:01 AM, Joerg Toellner wrote:
> Hi Postfix-Group,
> Any ideas appreciated. Would someone enlighten me, please? If you need more
> information or some parts of the config file posted, please don't hesitate
> to ask for it.
>
> Thanks in advance for reading, your effort and maybe a
2009/8/13 Eduardo Júnior :
> Hi,
>
> i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages.
> I read in somewhere that this is enough:
>
>
> -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers
>
> checks_headers:
> ^Received: from amavis IGNORE
> ...
>
No special configuration is required, only m
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages.
I read in somewhere that this is enough:
-o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers
Where'd you read this misinformation?
The header_checks parameter is only used by the cleanup daemon.
With header_ch
On Thursday 13 August 2009 06:17:37 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote:
> > I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
> >
> > To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If I want to accept
> > mails and relay to an admin email-id , is th
Dabrien 'Dabe' Murphy:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Instead of having to maintain a bazillion different reply parameters,
> > would not it be sufficient to have one generic reply line that
> > gets appended to all those reject commands?
> >
>
> Hi Wietse,
>
> If the dilemma is between:
I was t
Hari Hendaryanto:
> Hi,
>
> Does reject_rbl_client handle ipv6 address?
In Postfix 2.6 and later.
Wietse
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
>
> > mail_version = 2.7-20090807
> Some more details:
>
> Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: daemon started -- version
> 2.7-20090807, configuration /etc/postfix
> Aug 13 14:52:40 mail-ausfall postfix/master[5607]: warning: service "smtp"
On Thursday 13 August 2009 07:22:33 /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thursday 13 August 2009 06:17:37 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote:
> > > I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
> > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
> > >
> > > To reject mails from spamhaus listed IP's. If
Hello Everyone, I'm new to postfix/altermine and I have this problem:
This is my environment:
Solaris 10
postfix-2.5.0
altermime-0.3.8
Some random emails when they go to the altermine process are losing the
attachments:
When they arrive to my smpt gateway -
Aug 13 09:34:10 smtpgw01 pos
On 13-Aug-2009, at 10:44, Jesus Alejandro Cuevas Villegas wrote:
Hello Everyone, I'm new to postfix/altermine and I have this problem:
This is my environment:
Solaris 10
postfix-2.5.0
altermime-0.3.8
Is altermime part of postfix?
--
What the hell's goin' on in the engine room? Were there
Hello,
We are reconfiguring our incoming mail server.
It was working with greylisting enabled ; and we've just added the verify
(reject_unverified_recipient) capacity.
To avoid email address harvesting, we would like to keep on greylisting all
incoming mail wheteher or not it may fail the rej
Hello,
We are reconfiguring our mail systems.
We already have a mailfilter computer , which will be replaced.
To test the new mailfiltering system, I would like to duplicate all incoming
mail so as to forward it :
1/ to the old mailfilter computer ( where it will be distributed )
2/ to th
Wietse Venema wrote:
I was thinking of adding a second line to the antispam reject
messages. For example:
550-5.7.1 The existing reject message
550 5.7.1 Please see http://foo.example.com/ for support.
Nice.
One catch-all banner is infinitely better than nothing, and it's a good
Hi,
2009/8/13 Noel Jones :
> Eduardo Júnior wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm trying remove some headers from outgoing messages.
>> I read in somewhere that this is enough:
>>
>>
>> -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/checks_headers
>
> Where'd you read this misinformation?
I don't remember, but wasn
* Wietse Venema :
> > Oddly enough, this does only happen on mail-ausfall, mail, with the
> > same master.cf doesn't show it...
>
> The message i logged only when you run an OLD master daemon.
Very very strange. I suspected something like this and rebuilt. To no
avail. I will now nuke all the ol
fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello,
We are reconfiguring our incoming mail server.
It was working with greylisting enabled ; and we've just added the verify
(reject_unverified_recipient) capacity.
To avoid email address harvesting, we would like to keep on greylisting all
incoming mail whe
Quoting Melvyn Sopacua :
On Thursday 13 August 2009 07:22:33 /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thursday 13 August 2009 06:17:37 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 6:28 AM, ram wrote:
> > I use in smtpd_recipient restrictions
> > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
> >
> > To reject mails from spamhaus
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
I have two daemons smtp, one to incoming messages, other to outgoing mesages.
So, in master.cf I did that:
-o smtp_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks
Good. That should do the trick.
checks_headers:
^Received: from amavis IGNORE
...
proper form would be
/^Receiv
2009/8/13 Eduardo Júnior :
>
> Right.
> For this I wanted more information about debug level of the daemons,
> of the cleanup in special, to analyze the actions from my expressions.
>
>
>>
>> With header_checks, some choices are to add it to main.cf and remove
>> matching headers from all mail, def
Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
2009/8/13 Eduardo Júnior :
Right.
For this I wanted more information about debug level of the daemons,
of the cleanup in special, to analyze the actions from my expressions.
With header_checks, some choices are to add it to main.cf and remove
matching headers from
Hi
Is postfix capable to work in high-availability or load-balancing cluster?
If yes, where I can read about this. Please, give me a hint.
Thanks
Jesus Alejandro Cuevas Villegas wrote:
Some random emails when they go to the altermine process are losing the
attachments:
This is the postfix support list.
You'll need to ask on an altermime support channel about
problem with altermime.
I review my disclaimer.sh and I found a strang
Thanks A lot for this Great and extremely fast answer
Fred
- Message d'origine
De : Noel Jones
À : fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr; postfix-users@postfix.org
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 13 Août 2009, 19h40mn 47s
Objet : Re: usage of smtpd_recipient_restrictions ; greylisting ; verify
fmgre-list...@ya
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:23:17PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
I am not sure if it's the kernel's OOM killer or postfix itself which
causes it to quit.
1. The OOM killer _always_ uses SIGKILL. A program is not even given the
possibility to react.
2. root processes (like
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:58 PM, pch0317 wrote:
> Hi
> Is postfix capable to work in high-availability or load-balancing cluster?
> If yes, where I can read about this. Please, give me a hint.
>
> Thanks
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?q=postfix+high+availability
and since you posted an identica
On Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 19:16 CEST,
fmgre-list...@yahoo.fr wrote:
> We are reconfiguring our mail systems.
> We already have a mailfilter computer , which will be replaced.
>
> To test the new mailfiltering system, I would like to duplicate all
> incoming mail so as to forward it :
>
On Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 19:58 CEST,
pch0317 wrote:
> Is postfix capable to work in high-availability or load-balancing cluster?
> If yes, where I can read about this. Please, give me a hint.
This answer has been asked many times before so you can find many hints
in the list archives
Greetings,
client = thunderbird 3.0 beta 3
postfix 2.3.3
linux, host == jgstoy
doing TLS encryption and authentication.
windows/thunderbird 2.0.0.22 works
windows/outlook 2003 works
looking at /var/log/maillog i see that thunderbird 3 is setting
up a TLS connection okay.
but the authenticati
On Aug 12, 2009, at 10:33 PM, email builder wrote:
I am wondering if anyone has advice on where there are any email
health checks online. I used to use dnsstuff.com but they have
since gone commercial.
You have been given links and other suggestions for this that are
sound, I would foll
Hi,
>>
>> I have two daemons smtp, one to incoming messages, other to outgoing mesages.
>> So, in master.cf I did that:
>>
>> -o smtp_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks
>>
>
> smtpd (listener) is not smtp (client).
Ops, my mistake.
-o smtpd_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks
>
> A
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
>>
>> 2009/8/13 Eduardo Júnior :
>>>
>>> Right.
>>> For this I wanted more information about debug level of the daemons,
>>> of the cleanup in special, to analyze the actions from my expressions.
>>>
>>>
Wi
Original Message
Subject: thunderbird 3.0, cram-md5 failing
From: Jay G. Scott
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:03:38 PM
Greetings,
client = thunderbird 3.0 beta 3
postfix 2.3.3
linux, host == jgstoy
doing TLS encryption and authentication.
w
On Thursday, August 13, 2009 at 22:18 CEST,
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
> > smtpd (listener) is not smtp (client).
>
> Ops, my mistake.
>
> -o smtpd_header_checks=regexp:/path/header_checks
There is no such configuration parameter. To have different header
checks for different smtpd(8) listeners
Jeroen van Aart:
> I should add that I was miss interpreting the "terminating on signal
> 15". That in fact is my monitor doing its work, which I installed after
> noticing postfix would regularly quit. It's likely the actual kill
Internally, "postfix stop" uses SIGTERM to terminate the master
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> * Wietse Venema :
>
> > > Oddly enough, this does only happen on mail-ausfall, mail, with the
> > > same master.cf doesn't show it...
> >
> > The message i logged only when you run an OLD master daemon.
>
> Very very strange. I sus
Wietse Venema wrote:
Internally, "postfix stop" uses SIGTERM to terminate the master
daemon. This signal is also used by system shutdown procedures.
Right, the monitor will use /etc/init.d/postfix stop|start in order to
attempt to restart postfix.
Greetings,
Jeroen
Jeroen van Aart:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Internally, "postfix stop" uses SIGTERM to terminate the master
> > daemon. This signal is also used by system shutdown procedures.
>
> Right, the monitor will use /etc/init.d/postfix stop|start in order to
> attempt to restart postfix.
Postfix has pr
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:25:45PM -0500, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: thunderbird 3.0, cram-md5 failing
> From: Jay G. Scott
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Date: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:03:38 PM
>> Greetings,
>>
>> client = thunderbird 3.0 beta 3
>>
I would suggest using smtptest (part of cyrus) to confirm that your
server correctly authenticates using CRAM-MD5. If it works, then there's
a problem with thunderbird. If not, then you can either stop advertising
CRAM or look into fixing the problem on the server side.
that looks a
Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix has proven to be rock solid, and there is no need to
make it less reliable with trigger-happy babysitters.
I am not giving any value judgement to postfix. In fact it's one of the
few MTAs I would trust to run on any systems I manage.
The problem is not postfix, i
Hi all,
I'm not so experienced in dealing with postfix unfortunately and not sure if
I'm not breaking something in my security with applying next
smtpd_recipient_restrictions & etc (warn_if_reject - for testing period
only, will remove it later):
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 450
smtp_use
Jeroen van Aart:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Postfix has proven to be rock solid, and there is no need to
> > make it less reliable with trigger-happy babysitters.
>
> I am not giving any value judgement to postfix. In fact it's one of the
> few MTAs I would trust to run on any systems I manage.
taphy wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not so experienced in dealing with postfix unfortunately and not sure if
I'm not breaking something in my security with applying next
smtpd_recipient_restrictions & etc (warn_if_reject - for testing period
only, will remove it later):
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code
hi all,
sorry to ask this simple question. I couldn't find the solution
online.
I am hoping to relay mail for a friend's home server, which can't use
external port 25. I was hoping to define a hash somewhere for relay
recipients something like:
relay-domain.com smtp:relay-host.com:2525
wher
Dan Farrell wrote:
hi all,
sorry to ask this simple question. I couldn't find the solution
online.
I am hoping to relay mail for a friend's home server, which can't use
external port 25. I was hoping to define a hash somewhere for relay
recipients something like:
relay-domain.com smtp:rel
Hi Noel,
many thanks for reply.
So if I need restrict sending to some recipients that are exactly in
mynetworks (this postfix instance relays email to other
email-application on the same host) I have to put
check_recipient_access regexp:/etc/postfix/recipient.regexp before
permit_mynetworks but hav
tatiana philippova wrote:
Hi Noel,
many thanks for reply.
So if I need restrict sending to some recipients that are exactly in
mynetworks (this postfix instance relays email to other
email-application on the same host) I have to put
check_recipient_access regexp:/etc/postfix/recipient.regexp befo
Joel, hi again
Also question:
"Use DISCARD if you want to accept a message and silently discard it.
Note this affects ALL recipients of a multi-recipient message."
How exactly postfix deals with multi-recipient messages? Are there
any differences from simple telnet smtp session where I send mul
tatiana philippova wrote:
Joel, hi again
Also question:
"Use DISCARD if you want to accept a message and silently discard it.
Note this affects ALL recipients of a multi-recipient message."
How exactly postfix deals with multi-recipient messages? Are there
any differences from simple telnet s
Noel, many thanks a lot for information, much better now
Tatiana
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> tatiana philippova wrote:
>>
>> Joel, hi again
>>
>> Also question:
>> "Use DISCARD if you want to accept a message and silently discard it.
>> Note this affects ALL recipients o
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:33:05 -0500
Noel Jones wrote:
> Dan Farrell wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > I am hoping to relay mail for a friend's home server, which can't
> > use external port 25. I was hoping to define a hash somewhere for
> > relay recipients something like:
> >
> > relay-domain.com sm
Hello,
I'm new to Postfix and have been reading up on the various spam-fighting
features available. I get the general idea that I can have something of a
multi-tiered setup that should allow me to process a decent amount of mail
in an ISP environment. Smtp restrictions and reliable RBLs woul
Wietse Venema wrote:
Hari Hendaryanto:
Hi,
Does reject_rbl_client handle ipv6 address?
In Postfix 2.6 and later.
Wietse
thank you
PT.CITRA SARI MAKMUR
SATELLITE & TERRESTRIAL NETWORK
Connecting the distance - anytime, anywhere, any content
http://www.csmcom.com
63 matches
Mail list logo
