Hi,
I've got a postfix server with spamassassin running. If one of my
customers is on vacation he can turn on auto reply. For this I created a
script /usr/local/bin/responder.
It always worked but the last days it is stopped. I get the following
error in the maillog:
status=deferred (temporary fa
Hello,
a user of my mail gateway has got the following messages while have
tried to send a message to
,:
- Original Message -
From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 12:52 AM
Subject: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours
> *
On 7/9/2009, Rocco Scappatura (rocco.scappat...@infracom.it) wrote:
> # postconf -d | grep tls
? This shows defaults... please use postconf -n output - and no need to
filter it, it won't (shouldn't) be all that long...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Wim Groen:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a postfix server with spamassassin running. If one of my
> customers is on vacation he can turn on auto reply. For this I created a
> script /usr/local/bin/responder.
> It always worked but the last days it is stopped. I get the following
> error in the maillog:
> st
Rocco Scappatura:
> # postconf -d | grep tls
What web page is telling you to use "postconf -d" for
trouble shooting? It should say "postconf -n" instead.
Wietse
Thanks,
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Charles Marcus
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:43 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: TLS handshake failed
>
> On 7/9/2009, Rocco Scappatura (rocc
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:47 PM
> To: Postfix users
> Subject: Re: TLS handshake failed
>
> Rocco Scappatura:
> > # postconf -d | grep tls
>
Hi Wietse,
I don't use AppArmor and i disabled SELinux but it didn't helped.
Kind Regards,
Wim
Wim Groen:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a postfix server with spamassassin running. If one of my
> customers is on vacation he can turn on auto reply. For this I created
> a script /usr/local/bin/responde
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:17:20AM +0200, Wim Groen wrote:
> This is the master.cf:
> vacationunix- n n - - pipe
> flags=FRq user=vmail argv=/usr/local/bin/responder ${sender}
> ${recipient}
>
> When I look at the file it looks good:
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 ro
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:11:26AM +0200, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a user of my mail gateway has got the following messages while have
> tried to send a message to
> ,:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 12:52 AM
Thanks Victor,
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:11 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: TLS handshake failed
>
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:1
Hello,
i try to set up safe etrn.
i use in main.cf
smtpd_etrn_restrictions = check_etrn_access hash:/etc/postfix/etrn-domains
reject
if etrn-domain is found /etc/postfix/etrn-domains returns name of 2nd
restriction which checks by check_client_access other file for clientip and
returns ok if
Looking for some clarification to help me understand. Are
smtpd_*_restrictions processed in this order:
smtpd_client_restrictions
smtpd_helo_restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_data_restrictions
If these restriction mechanisms share a common has
Andre H?bner:
> Hello,
>
> i try to set up safe etrn.
> i use in main.cf
>
> smtpd_etrn_restrictions = check_etrn_access hash:/etc/postfix/etrn-domains
> reject
>
> if etrn-domain is found /etc/postfix/etrn-domains returns name of 2nd
> restriction which checks by check_client_access other fil
Andre Hübner wrote:
> setup works but there is still security-problem that a client ip which
> is allowed for etrn is requesting mails for other domain.
> is there a combination of restrictions to make it safe or is an own
> policy-service better solution?
As of ETRN works this is not to be consid
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 04:04:33PM -0400, wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases, dbm:/etc/newcompany/aliases,
>> nis:mail.aliases
>
> Are you sure you want a local aliases(5) file and not a virtual(5) aliases
> file? Generally, and especially for non-system us
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Jon wrote:
> Looking for some clarification to help me understand. Are
> smtpd_*_restrictions processed in this order:
>
> smtpd_client_restrictions
> smtpd_helo_restrictions
> smtpd_sender_restrictions
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> smtpd_data_restrictions
>
Jon wrote:
> Looking for some clarification to help me understand. Are
> smtpd_*_restrictions processed in this order:
>
> smtpd_client_restrictions
> smtpd_helo_restrictions
> smtpd_sender_restrictions
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> smtpd_data_restrictions
>
>
>
> If these restriction
On 7/9/2009, Robert Lopez (rlopez...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> If these restriction mechanisms share a common hash file for their check,
>> for example:
>>
>> /etc/postfix/main.cf
>> ...
>> smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access
>> hash:/etc/postfix/access_hash ...
>> ...
>> smtpd_sender_rest
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:25:40 +1000
Barney Desmond wrote:
> I haven't done this myself, but I hear policy servers are quite
> popular for this sort of thing (the usual question is how to setup
> sending quotas for users, so this would be a slight modification).
Yes, postfixpolicyd can do this.
Th
Hello,
I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with postfix, and send
postfix multiple messages over one SMTP connection, I get the following warning
in the log file:
Jun 18 10:32:58 skidmark postfix/smtpd[11622]: warning: milter unix:/snf-
milter/socket: unexpected filter resp
Alban Deniz:
> Hello,
>
> I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with postfix, and
> send
> postfix multiple messages over one SMTP connection, I get the following
> warning
> in the log file:
>
> Jun 18 10:32:58 skidmark postfix/smtpd[11622]: warning: milter unix:/snf-
> mi
On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:01:28 pm Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alban Deniz:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with postfix,
> > and send postfix multiple messages over one SMTP connection, I get the
> > following warning in the log file:
> >
> > Jun 18 10:32:5
Alban Deniz:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:01:28 pm Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Alban Deniz:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with postfix,
> > > and send postfix multiple messages over one SMTP connection, I get the
> > > following warning in the log f
Hi,
I have repeating problem with delivering mail to one of our customers. It looks
like e-mail stays endlessly in active queue. At first I've thought that it might
be some network issue on customer side as my netstat shows something waits for a
long time in Send-Q:
tcp0 86284 myserver:4
On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:51:38 pm Wietse Venema wrote:
> Alban Deniz:
> > On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:01:28 pm Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Alban Deniz:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I've implemented a milter (SNFMilter), and when I use it with
> > > > postfix, and send postfix multiple messages
Thanks all for the previous help getting postfix up and running with
ldap / tls.. Finally after I don't even know how many build attempts,
,it's up and running :)
My setup is all mail is delivered from a mail host to my postfix from
another server. They do ldap lookups which is working fine.
On Jul 9, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Jon wrote:
Looking for some clarification to help me understand. Are
smtpd_*_restrictions processed in this order:
smtpd_client_restrictions
smtpd_helo_restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_data_restrictions
The processi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there. We use both postgrey and policyd-weight to block spam.
policyd-weight checks against several RBL and DNSBL so each time a mail
is received several queries are done in order to get a score. On the
other side, we have a filter with postgrey th
Ignacio Garcia wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there. We use both postgrey and policyd-weight to block spam.
policyd-weight checks against several RBL and DNSBL so each time a mail
is received several queries are done in order to get a score. On the
other side, we have a
Alban Deniz:
> > Postfix receives the "add header" request when it reports a "mail
> > from" command to the Milter.
>
> I'm not sure I understand--Doesn't postfix report a "mail from" command to the
> Milter by invoking the xxfi_envfrom callback? As I understand it, that isn't
> the end-of-messa
Jakub Nadolny:
> Jul 8 12:43:33 zonk postfix/qmgr[7095]: DF7C21811E53:
> from=, size=4254293, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
> Jul 8 13:33:40 zonk postfix/qmgr[16317]: DF7C21811E53: skipped, still being
> delivered
> Jul 8 13:34:41 zonk postfix/qmgr[16317]: DF7C21811E53: skipped, still being
> delive
Alban Deniz:
> It seems to me that if postfix is expecting an SMFIR_ADDHEADER
> milter response after invoking the xxfi_envfrom application
1) Postfix does not invoke xxfi callbacks. Instead, Postfix sends
messages to the milter application, where libmilter invokes
the application callbacks.
2) P
Hello, I have been looking into this for the better part of today. I
am using a proxy in front of postfix. In order to be able to AUTH a
user through the proxy, the proxy needs the 250-AUTH credentials to
show up.
I discovered that mynetworks disables this for those hosts listed in
myne
Scott Haneda:
> Hello, I have been looking into this for the better part of today. I
> am using a proxy in front of postfix. In order to be able to AUTH a
> user through the proxy, the proxy needs the 250-AUTH credentials to
> show up.
>
> I discovered that mynetworks disables this for tho
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009, brian moore wrote:
> > I haven't done this myself, but I hear policy servers are quite
> > popular for this sort of thing (the usual question is how to setup
> > sending quotas for users, so this would be a slight modification).
>
> Yes, postfixpolicyd can do this.
>
> The r
36 matches
Mail list logo
