I have a mailing list server where an application sends mails to list
members using /usr/sbin/sendmail ( on commandline)
When the mailing is going on I find that /usr/sbin/sendmail takes quiet
some time to return even for a trivial message
For eg.
sendmail -f r...@netcore.co.in r...@netcore.co.
Hello everyone.
I want to use postfix as frontend for a amount of non postfix mail server
( old CGP ) with a huge trafic. Right now I'm testing this scheme with two
backend servers. Postfix doing all antispam work, greylisting and after
verify recipient by verify trasnport (on an already known dom
ram wrote:
I have a mailing list server where an application sends mails to list
members using /usr/sbin/sendmail ( on commandline)
When the mailing is going on I find that /usr/sbin/sendmail takes quiet
some time to return even for a trivial message
For eg.
sendmail -f r...@netcore.co.in r..
Hi Wietse,
thank you for your very fast reply!
> > 192.168.xxx.xxx:25 inetn - n - -
> > smtpd -o content_filter=
> >
> > This also works fine besides the fact, that mail send to the local
> > smtp-port also is filtered by spamassassin. Can anyone point m
The address verify feature DOES NOT create its own connection cache.
If you disagree, show actual evidence from the Postfix logfile,
and explain what part of this evidence means that Postfix
verification creates its own connection cache.
Wietse
> The address verify feature DOES NOT create its own connection cache.
>
> If you disagree, show actual evidence from the Postfix logfile,
> and explain what part of this evidence means that Postfix
> verification creates its own connection cache.
>
> Wietse
Sorry, it's all about my bad eng
Simon Schelkshorn a écrit :
> Hi Wietse,
>
> thank you for your very fast reply!
>
>>> 192.168.xxx.xxx:25 inetn - n - -
>>> smtpd -o content_filter=
>>>
>>> This also works fine besides the fact, that mail send to the local
>>> smtp-port also is filtered
Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle a écrit :
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am new to Postfix and I have things setup and working, except one
> particular domain is giving me an issue. The rest of the domains on this
> server work as expected.
>
> My error is:
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanentl
> There is no mails in queue, which fail to delivered. Messages to already
> known/verified addreses delivered normal to backend servers.
>
> But verify often fails with error "Recipient address rejected: unverified
> address: lost connection with mail.xxx[x.x.x.x] while receiving the
> initial ser
On 5/21/2009 3:10 AM, mouss wrote:
Dr.Pesko a écrit :
On 5/20/2009 1:03 AM, mouss wrote:
Dr.Pesko a écrit :
Hello everyone,
can postfix automatically create delivery notification info for every
sent message and store it in another mailbox? Thanks.
it's unclear
Bijayant Kumar a écrit :
> Some body please help me, its very urgent.
>
if you use amavisd-new, it already supports altermime. it's probably
easier.
if you want to integrate altermime directly, please follow the FILTER
README directions.
ALso, instead of using ipfilter to redirect traffic, you
Dr.Pesko:
> Nope, I need option which can enable auto DSN report about sent messages
> and will send it to another mailbox. Is it possible in postfix? Thanks.
This is not an MTA feature.
It is sometimes found in MUAs, as "save a copy of my sent emails".
Wietse
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:17 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Dr.Pesko:
> > Nope, I need option which can enable auto DSN report about sent messages
> > and will send it to another mailbox. Is it possible in postfix? Thanks.
>
> This is not an MTA feature.
>
> It is sometimes found in MUAs, as "save
Steve:
> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:17 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Dr.Pesko:
> > > Nope, I need option which can enable auto DSN report about sent messages
> > > and will send it to another mailbox. Is it possible in postfix? Thanks.
> >
> > This is not an MTA feature.
> >
> > It is sometimes
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 08:52:45PM -0400, Jon wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> When building out the various checks available to postfix, is there a
>> mechanism for doing a REJECT, WARN or OK plus the reason, en mass, without
>> pasting the same text a lot? For example.
HI All,
How can I allow e-mails to be sent from my website to external users
(like GMail) but not be an open-relay to spammers?
-Jason
> HI All,
>
> How can I allow e-mails to be sent from my website to external users
> (like GMail) but not be an open-relay to spammers?
>
By default Postfix will deliver mail to it's intended destination (GMail, AOL,
etc.). but will accept mail only from IP addresses in "mynetworks".
I believe m
>
>> HI All,
>>
>> How can I allow e-mails to be sent from my website to external users
>> (like GMail) but not be an open-relay to spammers?
>>
>
> By default Postfix will deliver mail to it's intended destination (GMail, AOL,
> etc.). but will accept mail only from IP addresses in "mynetworks".
is there any difference between these two? Redirect mail to another address
and Forward mail to another address ?
could be a dumb confusion!
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:44 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Steve:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 12:17 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Dr.Pesko:
> > > > Nope, I need option which can enable auto DSN report about sent
> > > > messages
> > > > and will send it to another mailbox. Is it possible in post
On Thursday 21 May 2009 21:35:15 K bharathan wrote:
> is there any difference between these two? Redirect mail to another
> address and Forward mail to another address ?
> could be a dumb confusion!
Strictly speaking, redirect tells the sender to look elsewhere, while forward
accepts the mail a
I was taking apart a well know anti spam appliance on the Bench today
and it has some interesting (but clearly ripped off) software inside.
I managed to find;
INBOUND MTA
{own munged MTA with a queue structure just like Postfix called BSMTP}
This pushes inbound mail VIA Clam/AmavisNew/Spamassasin
Quoting Melvyn Sopacua :
On Thursday 21 May 2009 21:35:15 K bharathan wrote:
is there any difference between these two? Redirect mail to another
address and Forward mail to another address ?
could be a dumb confusion!
Strictly speaking, redirect tells the sender to look elsewhere, while for
On Wednesday 20 May 2009 21:14:39 Dr.Pesko wrote:
> On 5/20/2009 1:03 AM, mouss wrote:
> > Dr.Pesko a écrit :
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> can postfix automatically create delivery notification info for every
> >> sent message and store it in another mailbox? Thanks.
> >
> > it's unclear what you
Steve:
> The real question I guess I am asking - is it possible to have three
> instances of Postfix running on the same box, listening on different
> ports, with separate queue directories? Actually, it would be more
> accurate to ask HOW someone would implement this and what benefits it
> could g
Hi Terry,
How can I allow e-mails to be sent from my website to external users
(like GMail) but not be an open-relay to spammers?
By default Postfix will deliver mail to it's intended destination
(GMail, AOL,
etc.). but will accept mail only from IP addresses in "mynetworks".
Sorry, I re
Hi,
I have an imap server where users can set to forward their mails to personal
mails..but our main smtp server does not allow to send mails with not
allowed sender address. Forwarded emails have sender address that is mostly
not allowed (because its address of any sender from the world:).
From:
Radim Roska:
> Hi,
>
> I have an imap server where users can set to forward their mails to personal
> mails..but our main smtp server does not allow to send mails with not
> allowed sender address. Forwarded emails have sender address that is mostly
> not allowed (because its address of any sender
> Well, I have a ColdFusion based website that I have a few forms that
> users submit to sign up for events. So they dont log in or anything. I
> specified localhost in and it works for domains on my system,
> but when I send the user a copy of what they submitted they dont get it.
>
> My main.cf
Thank you...Please do you have any idea how to do that? Its just I can
figure just one solution..send these forwarded mails to external
script..which is solution I dont find very nice :).
Thanks
Radim
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Radim Roska:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have an
Hi Terry,
My main.cf says:
mynetworks = 172.16.254.0/28
That address is my apartment. I am hosting this at mosso so I have
one
static from them of 67.23.34.37. Mail and CF run on this same IP.
It looks like the mail isn't going out because Postfix does not
trust your
local machine and i
On Friday 22 May 2009 00:23:15 Radim Roska wrote:
> Thank you...Please do you have any idea how to do that? Its just I can
> figure just one solution..send these forwarded mails to external
> script..which is solution I dont find very nice :).
Bypass the problem: if your imap application generates
$ postmap -q f...@mydomain.com regexp:/etc/postfix/virtual
b...@somewhere-else.tld
Yet, if postfix actually receives a message destined for
f...@mydomain.com, I see this log activity:
May 21 18:37:02 bks-mail2 postfix/smtp[5803]: C728A1100053:\
to=, orig_to=,\
relay=mx1.myotherdomain.com[]:25, de
2009/5/22 Steve :
> This 'BSMTP' munged MTA looks to offer very little more than Postfix
> save for some Rate Control/Throttling/Better logging ? From my early
> explorations with Postfix, it can mostly do all of this anyway or am I
> missing something?
We've also pulled apart a well-known anti-sp
Well...I seem to have partially answered my own question. If I remove
the catch-all regexp, the address is rewritten correctly. Still, why
does postmap -q present a different result?
And, how can I accomplish the catch-all rewrite if this is the expected
behavior of regexp? I may have misunderstoo
2009/5/22 Ken :
> Perhaps regexp continues processing
> postfix/virtual after the first match and also substitutes based on the
> final catch-all rule?
Correct, virtual_alias_maps are recursive (out to 1000 iterations by
default, I think).
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#virtual_alias_recur
Can someone please help me understand why I am seeing this entry over
and over in my Postfix queue? Is this dangerous or does this mean I
have been compromised?
I am seeing this over and over in my queue even after I remove it with
the "postsuper -d" command:
502E97782FC 4527 Thu May 21 16:48
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> tom lee:
>> postqueue -p and mailq doesn't display the queued mails sorted based
>> on the arrival time.
>
> Why can't you let the mail system work FOR you,
This is the special system dealing things differently.
Thanks for you and other's he
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Carlos Williams wrote:
> Can someone please help me understand why I am seeing this entry over
> and over in my Postfix queue? Is this dangerous or does this mean I
> have been compromised?
No need to be alarmist; search the logs for further enlightenment.
> I am seeing this
tom lee:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > tom lee:
> >> postqueue -p and mailq doesn't display the queued mails sorted based
> >> on the arrival time.
> >
> > Why can't you let the mail system work FOR you,
>
> This is t
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> No need to be alarmist; search the logs for further enlightenment.
I checked the logs and found the following when I search for the message ID:
May 21 16:48:04 mail postfix/smtpd[22513]: 502E97782FC:
client=localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
M
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > No need to be alarmist; search the logs for further enlightenment.
>
> I checked the logs and found the following when I search for the message ID:
s/message/queue/ :-)
> May 21 16:48:04 mail
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:51:20AM -0700, Curtis wrote:
>
>> So, on a box that I know has nothing else feeding into the maildrop
>> queue, it would be safe to skip the step of dropping it in the idle
>> queue of a second instance (on
--- On Thu, 21/5/09, mouss wrote:
> From: mouss
> Subject: Re: Fw: Not able to add disclaimer
> To: "postfix"
> Date: Thursday, 21 May, 2009, 9:36 PM
> Bijayant Kumar a écrit :
> > Some body please help me, its very urgent.
> >
>
> if you use amavisd-new, it already supports altermime. it's
wiskbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
My problem was that my main.cf, although stating the aliases map with:
alias_database = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = dbm:/etc/postfix/aliases
Was actually using /etc/aliases. Not sure why, I've just deleted the /etc one
and sym-linked the /etc/postfix/ali
On Friday, May 22, 2009 at 01:03 CEST,
Ken wrote:
[...]
> .:postfix/main.cf
> myhostname = mx1.mydomain.com
> myorigin = $mydomain
> mydestination =
> local_recipient_maps =
> mynetworks_style = host
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks
> check_sender_acc
* Steve :
> This 'BSMTP' munged MTA looks to offer very little more than Postfix
> save for some Rate Control/Throttling/Better logging ? From my early
> explorations with Postfix, it can mostly do all of this anyway or am I
> missing something?
Postfix does rate control, but on a "one size fits
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:06 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
> 2009/5/22 Steve :
> > This 'BSMTP' munged MTA looks to offer very little more than Postfix
> > save for some Rate Control/Throttling/Better logging ? From my early
> > explorations with Postfix, it can mostly do all of this anyway or am I
>
* Steve :
> The feature set that this 'bsmtp' proxy seems to offer are;
> 1. Recipient Verification checks via one of three mechanisms in sequence
> a. LDAP/AD query (able to query one or more LDAP servers)
> b. SMTP Recipient Verification (sends a test message to server
> from '
Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009 21:14:39 Dr.Pesko wrote:
On 5/20/2009 1:03 AM, mouss wrote:
Dr.Pesko a écrit :
Hello everyone,
can postfix automatically create delivery notification info for every
sent message and store it in another mailbox? Thanks.
it
50 matches
Mail list logo
