Curtis:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> I guess this has been discussed a time or two already, but, as of yet,
> I haven't found anyone that has found a real solution. ?We need the
> ability to have around 1000 domains per physical server, while
> allowing each domain to maintai
Zhengquan Zhang:
> Dear postfix community,
>
> I use postfix personally on my computer to send emails, also two mail
> servers I am in charge of are running postfix.
>
> Now I have a basic question about my personal computer postfix
> configuration that I don't have a answer for:
>
> I followed
Hello,
I'd like to get my postfix system to pull the virtual transport from a
table, so that I can have some domains use procmail and others use
Dovecot's deliver while I test this out.
I'm adding this to a system that is already up and running using mysql
for lookups of users, passwords, et
Jeff Rice wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to get my postfix system to pull the virtual transport from a
table, so that I can have some domains use procmail and others use
Dovecot's deliver while I test this out.
I'm adding this to a system that is already up and running using mysql
for lookups of us
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Curtis:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
oops... darn gmail.
>> So... my thought is that a policy server is the answer. However, I
>> can't seem to find a policy server that supports sender blacklisting
>> which is writt
Curtis:
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#protocol ) it says
> 'The "recipient" attribute is available only ... when Postfix accepted
> only one recipient for the current message.'
That text is about the DATA protocol stage.
You get each recipient at the RCPT TO protocol stage.
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:00:45AM -0600, Curtis wrote:
> However, I just ran into another potential
> "show stopper"... in the notes of the protocol description (
> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.html#protocol ) it says
> 'The "recipient" attribute is available only ... when Postfix a
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> Either allow and support delimited addresses, or don't. Accepting them and
>> then discarding them is... well, not right.
>
> No, sometimes one wants to do exactly that. The extension remains
> in message headers, even if lost from the env
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:09:17PM +0200, Daniel Hahler wrote:
> > propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical, virtual
>
> But that would also include the whole of virtual delivery, no? (e.g.
> to virtual_domains etc
Yes, of course. When some downstream domains can't handle recipient
extensions,
(I know this is a bit off postfix, but not completely)
I'm running postfix as MTA on a machine with several CMS. Recently,
there is a huge number of spam being sent from there, alas. When I scan
the logs, all those come from 'root', meaning they don't come through
port 25. I run OpenBSD with m
Uwe Dippel:
> (I know this is a bit off postfix, but not completely)
>
> I'm running postfix as MTA on a machine with several CMS. Recently,
> there is a huge number of spam being sent from there, alas. When I scan
> the logs, all those come from 'root', meaning they don't come through
> port 2
Wietse Venema:
> Uwe Dippel:
> > (I know this is a bit off postfix, but not completely)
> >
> > I'm running postfix as MTA on a machine with several CMS. Recently,
> > there is a huge number of spam being sent from there, alas. When I scan
> > the logs, all those come from 'root', meaning they d
On Tue, April 7, 2009 17:37, Noel Jones wrote:
> Matteo D'Alfonso wrote:
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> My objective is to receive local mail, and act as relay only for a
>> limited
>> poll of email address, and from a limited poll of IP.
>>
>> LAN1,LAN2,LAN3-->server_that_i_can_configure(LAN1)-->company_rela
13 matches
Mail list logo
