Re: selective milter possible?

Rudy Gevaert: > Hello, > > I was looking for a way to do selective milter. Meaning if a specific > host connects I send it trough the milter. > > I couldn't find it however. Is it possible? You didn't find it because it is not implemented. Wietse > Thanks in advance, > > -- > --

Re: selective milter possible?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:51:42AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote: > Hello, > > I was looking for a way to do selective milter. Meaning if a specific > host connects I send it trough the milter. > > I couldn't find it however. Is it possible? Maybe try milter manager, supposedly you can have flexib

Postfix spool message format description

Hi, is there anywhere a format description for the queued-mails? I'm trying to build my own content_filter, like described in http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html#simple_filter. But the sentence there (script, line 24) "Specify your content filter here." is not very helpful without knowi

selective milter possible?

Hello, I was looking for a way to do selective milter. Meaning if a specific host connects I send it trough the milter. I couldn't find it however. Is it possible? Thanks in advance, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Rudy Gevaert rudy.geva

Re: Postfix spool message format description

karfunckel-post...@yahoo.de: > > Hi, > is there anywhere a format description for the queued-mails? You can access Postfix's email data via official interfaces: smtp, pipe-to-command, milter, /usr/sbin/sendmail submission. Wietse

Re: Postfix spool message format description

On Mon, March 30, 2009 2:05 pm, karfunckel-post...@yahoo.de said: > is there anywhere a format description for the queued-mails? No. And you don't need it. > I'm trying to build my own content_filter, like described in > http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html#simple_filter. But the sentence >

Re: rewrite a sender-adresss in dependence of the recipient adress

--- mouss schrieb am So, 29.3.2009: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> is there a way to rewrite a sender address in > >> dependence of > >>> the recipient? > >>> > >>> Example: > >>> sender + recipient = new sender address > >>> > -- > >>> j...@example.net > >> + j

Transparent mail filter

Hi, I am in the process of setting up a t ransparent mail filter . Postfix seems the best I could find for this. I already have the following 'idea' about how it should be NAT route

Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

I noticed I keep getting the same spam message delivered to a building wide distribution via Postfix and I can't understand why the following are not catching it every time? Here is the message: Return-Path: X-Original-To: every...@ Delivered-To: cwilli...@ Received: by mail. (Postfi

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

Carlos Williams wrote: I noticed I keep getting the same spam message delivered to a building wide distribution via Postfix and I can't understand why the following are not catching it every time? You'll need to post log entries showing the message being accepted. The two you posted were both

Configuration/backscatter problem

Hi, I have a machine running postfix 2.2.8. I recently noticed that it is putting messages in the queue for non-existent users and then trying to send bounce messages. Can someone please look at the following postconf -n output and tell me what I have screwed up? I really want to stop this but I

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Terry Carmen wrote: > You'll need to post log entries showing the message being accepted. The two > you posted were both rejected. > > Terry Sorry. Does this help? It was basically everything I found in my log. mail:~# cat /var/log/mail.log | grep -i "teem...@i

Re: Configuration/backscatter problem

Tom Diehl wrote: > Hi, > > I have a machine running postfix 2.2.8. I recently noticed that it is > putting > messages in the queue for non-existent users and then trying to send > bounce > messages. Can someone please look at the following postconf -n output > and tell > me what I have screwed up?

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

Carlos Williams wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Terry Carmen wrote: You'll need to post log entries showing the message being accepted. The two you posted were both rejected. Terry Sorry. Does this help? It was basically everything I found in my log. mail:~# cat /var/log/

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

Carlos Williams wrote: I noticed I keep getting the same spam message delivered to a building wide distribution via Postfix and I can't understand why the following are not catching it every time? Here is the message: Return-Path: X-Original-To: every...@ Delivered-To: cwilli...@ Recei

Re: Transparent mail filter

Serge Fonville wrote: Hi, I am in the process of setting up a t ransparent mail filter . Postfix seems the best I could find for this. Please don't post HTML to the list. Pos

Re: Configuration/backscatter problem

On Monday, March 30, 2009 at 17:07 CEST, Tom Diehl wrote: > I have a machine running postfix 2.2.8. I recently noticed that it is > putting messages in the queue for non-existent users and then trying > to send bounce messages. Can someone please look at the following > postconf -n output a

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > To search the log, use the QUEUEID reported in the first Received: header > added by your system.  Note Received headers are read bottom to top, so the > first one is the lowest one with your server name. Sorry all. Let me start with posting t

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

Carlos Williams wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Noel Jones wrote: To search the log, use the QUEUEID reported in the first Received: header added by your system. Note Received headers are read bottom to top, so the first one is the lowest one with your server name. Sorry all. Let me

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:18:44PM -0400, Carlos Williams wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > > To search the log, use the QUEUEID reported in the first Received: header > > added by your system. ??Note Received headers are read bottom to top, so the > > first one is th

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > It appears the QUEUEID you want to look for is A94B31FA4DA0. > That should be listed in the first (reading up from the bottom) Received > header in the message. I searched and found what is listed below. Are you saying that reads from bottom to

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:42:26PM -0400, Carlos Williams wrote: > I searched and found what is listed below. Are you saying that reads > from bottom to top? Is this even what I am looking for to help > understand my issue? Here we, go again, do please look at the Received headers of the message.

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > Here we, go again, do please look at the Received headers of the > message... Sorry - this is new to me so please bare with my confusion. I apologise again. > Now the upstream (still your system) queue-id is 910AA1FA4D9E, perhaps > this i

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

Carlos Williams wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote: It appears the QUEUEID you want to look for is A94B31FA4DA0. That should be listed in the first (reading up from the bottom) Received header in the message. I searched and found what is listed below. Are you saying that

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

Carlos Williams wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: Here we, go again, do please look at the Received headers of the message... Sorry - this is new to me so please bare with my confusion. I apologise again. We're referring to the headers in one of the ac

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > Can you post the full unaltered headers of the message? Change the username > part of mail addresses to protect privacy. Noel, I am guessing I just post the headers from the message as I see it with the exception of the username for privacy, c

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:57:25PM -0400, Carlos Williams wrote: > Mar 30 10:32:52 mail postfix/smtpd[14504]: 910AA1FA4D9E: > client=unknown[59.165.5.205] http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=59.165.5.205 This IP address was added to the CBL component of XBL, today at 16:00 GMT +/- 30 minute

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

Carlos Williams wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Noel Jones wrote: Can you post the full unaltered headers of the message? Change the username part of mail addresses to protect privacy. Noel, I am guessing I just post the headers from the message as I see it with the exception of the

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:46:54PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: >> Received: from 59.165.5.205.man-static.vsnl.net.in (unknown [59.165.5.205]) >> by mail.ideorlando.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910AA1FA4D9E >> for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) > > Excellent. Received: headers are r

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On 30-Mar-2009, at 13:20, Carlos Williams wrote: Received: from 59.165.5.205.man-static.vsnl.net.in (unknown [59.165.5.205]) by mail.ideorlando.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910AA1FA4D9E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) There are so many spam warnings in that header.

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

LuKreme wrote: On 30-Mar-2009, at 13:20, Carlos Williams wrote: Received: from 59.165.5.205.man-static.vsnl.net.in (unknown [59.165.5.205]) by mail.ideorlando.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910AA1FA4D9E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT) There are so many spam warnings in that

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

On 30-Mar-2009, at 14:40, Noel Jones wrote: LuKreme wrote: On 30-Mar-2009, at 13:20, Carlos Williams wrote: Received: from 59.165.5.205.man-static.vsnl.net.in (unknown [59.165.5.205]) by mail.ideorlando.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910AA1FA4D9E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:32:52 -0400 (

Re: Spam Filters Not Catching Repeating Offenders?

LuKreme wrote: On 30-Mar-2009, at 14:40, Noel Jones wrote: LuKreme wrote: On 30-Mar-2009, at 13:20, Carlos Williams wrote: Received: from 59.165.5.205.man-static.vsnl.net.in (unknown [59.165.5.205]) by mail.ideorlando.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910AA1FA4D9E for ; Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:

Re: Transparent mail filter

> Please don't post HTML to the list. Sorry about the HTML. > Postfix is not a transparent proxy and can not be made to behave like one. > Postfix can be used as an MX gateway in front of exchange, here's a general > If you want a transparent proxy, you might look at ASSP. Thanks for the answer,

etc/postfix/sender_access_map and /etc/aliases

mail# cat /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf # ## Basic parameters # myhostname = mail.xx.xx.xx mydomain = xx.xx.xx mynetworks = 127.0.0.1 192.168.68.0/24 192.168.69.0/24 # ## Lookup # # we put our maps under a single directory map_directory = /etc/postfix/maps # handy variables

Re: etc/postfix/sender_access_map and /etc/aliases

Dave Johnson wrote: The problem I am having is as follows Alias The mail is not being moved from info to louise when it arrives aliases are only applied to mail delivered by the postfix "local" transport. Generally this means the domain must be listed in mydestination. Log entries showin

recipient_bcc_maps, sender_bcc_maps

hi i have a postfix set up with a bunch of virtual domains. we've been using always_bcc to archive the mail, until one of the paranoid users asked us not to include his mail in the archive. so i'm trying to do the same with recipient/sender maps: recipient_bcc_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/re

Re: etc/postfix/sender_access_map and /etc/aliases

-Original Message- From: Noel Jones Reply-To: postfix users list To: Dave Johnson , postfix users list Subject: Re: etc/postfix/sender_access_map and /etc/aliases Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:11 -0500 Dave Johnson wrote: > The problem I am having is as follows > > Alias > > The mail

Re: Configuration/backscatter problem

Hi Magnus, On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Magnus Bäck wrote: On Monday, March 30, 2009 at 17:07 CEST, Tom Diehl wrote: I have a machine running postfix 2.2.8. I recently noticed that it is putting messages in the queue for non-existent users and then trying to send bounce messages. Can someone ple

Re: Transparent mail filter

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:44:48PM +0200, Serge Fonville wrote: > > Postfix is not a transparent proxy and can not be made to behave like one. > > Postfix can be used as an MX gateway in front of exchange, here's a general > > If you want a transparent proxy, you might look at ASSP. > > Thanks fo

Logging Postfix Activity

Dear All, Is there any way to logging/record the activity pop3,IMAP when they deleted email via IMAP and POP3 ( outlook deleted email when outlook download it from server) I have problem when my customer he lost his email on my server he said he didn't deleted his email, he set his outlook 'le

RE: Logging Postfix Activity

From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Marky Yehezkiel (SNC) Sent: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 12:53 PM To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Logging Postfix Activity Dear All, Is

Re: Logging Postfix Activity

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Marky Yehezkiel (SNC) wrote: > Dear All, > > Is there any way to logging/record the activity pop3,IMAP when they deleted > email via IMAP and POP3 ( outlook deleted email when outlook download it > from server) > > > > I have problem when my customer he lost his em

RE: Logging Postfix Activity

Hi all, Thank you for the explanation, I use courier-imap, I will search it but if any one already know how to produce log activity courier imap it will great. Thank you -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Aaron

Re: Logging Postfix Activity

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Marky Yehezkiel (SNC) wrote: > Is there any way to logging/record the activity pop3,IMAP when they deleted > email via IMAP and POP3 ( outlook deleted email when outlook download it > from server) Yes. > I have problem when my customer he lost his email on my server he said

RE: Logging Postfix Activity

Hi Sahil, Thank you for your help. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Sahil Tandon Sent: 31 Maret 2009 10:26 To: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Logging Postfix Activity On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Marky Yehezkie