On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Noel Jones <njo...@megan.vbhcs.org> wrote: > It appears the QUEUEID you want to look for is A94B31FA4DA0. > That should be listed in the first (reading up from the bottom) Received > header in the message.
I searched and found what is listed below. Are you saying that reads from bottom to top? Is this even what I am looking for to help understand my issue? mail:~# grep A94B31FA4DA0 /var/log/mail.log Mar 30 10:33:01 mail postfix/smtpd[15411]: A94B31FA4DA0: client=localhost[127.0.0.1] Mar 30 10:33:01 mail postfix/cleanup[14524]: A94B31FA4DA0: message-id=<01c9b172$81de7e00$cd05a...@teemigh> Mar 30 10:33:01 mail postfix/qmgr[2680]: A94B31FA4DA0: from=<teem...@iqnetsys.net>, size=2140, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 30 10:33:01 mail amavis[15415]: (15415-10) FWD via SMTP: <teem...@iqnetsys.net> -> <every...@ideorlando.org>, 250 2.6.0 Ok, id=15415-10, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as A94B31FA4DA0 Mar 30 10:33:01 mail amavis[15415]: (15415-10) Passed SPAMMY, [59.165.5.205] [59.165.5.205] <teem...@iqnetsys.net> -> <every...@ideorlando.org>, Message-ID: <01c9b172$81de7e00$cd05a...@teemigh>, mail_id: x9wUuMu35-4A, Hits: 16.926, queued_as: A94B31FA4DA0, 8288 ms Mar 30 10:33:01 mail postfix/smtp[15341]: 910AA1FA4D9E: to=<every...@ideorlando.org>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=9.4, delays=1.1/0/0/8.3, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=15415-10, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as A94B31FA4DA0) Mar 30 10:33:01 mail postfix/local[15394]: A94B31FA4DA0: to=<every...@ideorlando.org>, relay=local, delay=0.21, delays=0.06/0/0/0.16, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (forwarded as B71C61FA4DA3) Mar 30 10:33:01 mail postfix/qmgr[2680]: A94B31FA4DA0: removed > BTW, consider restricting access to "everyone" or other easily-guessed list > names using something similar to this example: > http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal Well I am implementing Mailman on my server next week which does not permit non-subscribed addresses to pass through without approval. Obviously those would be denied. Should I still consider doing the mentioned above if I plan to implement Mailman on my Postfix server?
