On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:41:54PM +0800, saguto yin wrote:
> hi, folks
>
> this is a simple patch to make postfix 2.5.6 send queueid by xforward
> command to next-hop, hope this can be ...
>
> BTW: server side queueid parse does not done in this patch.
Why is this necessary? What's wrong with
Dear,
Can I use a canonical map like:
if /^To: u...@domain\.com$/
/^From: (".*" )*(.+)@(.+)$/ From: ${1}${2}+$...@anotherdomain.com
endif
Thanks,
Yves
On 10-Mar-2009, at 21:42, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You are supposed to now have just the domains here, and the user
mappings
in virtual_alias_maps.
OK, i thought I tried that when I put the bare domains in
virtual_alias_domains but something else must have been mucked up then.
I did say mu
On 10-Mar-2009, at 20:43, Glen B wrote:
Why no TZ was set in the chroot, I'm clueless
Because the chroot jail doesn't have access to read the TMZ information?
--
I draw the line at 7 unreturned phone calls.
On 10-Mar-2009, at 21:48, Sahil Tandon wrote:
The lookup key for virtual_alias_DOMAINS should be a domain name,
not full address. Are you going to reply with some more sarcastic
pedantry? :-)
Hey now, there's always room for more sarcastic pedantry!
I *think* I have it all straight in my h
On 10-Mar-2009, at 18:15, mme...@gmail.com wrote:
when postfix wants to send a bounce message (notifying the rejected
message), my mail system will always try to deliver it directly to
the recipient server (i'm not using a relayhost)... i think i need
to change <> to _real_send...@realdomai
Hi list,
I am trying to run a second instance of postfix for a separate queue
(see my thread "Prioritising outgoing mail" for why). I have followed
information on the Internet but still can't get it running.
I have set up a second instance with a second IP and separate config and
spool directorie
Glen B:
> directly. So, can I request a raw message dump tool that simply outputs
> the headers and data section? I'd be fine with a raw envelope used in
> SMTP DATA transactions. If this is possible with an existing tool then
> I'd be fine with that also. As it stands I can't rely on postcat ou
Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 02:41:54PM +0800, saguto yin wrote:
>
> > hi, folks
> >
> > this is a simple patch to make postfix 2.5.6 send queueid by xforward
> > command to next-hop, hope this can be ...
> >
> > BTW: server side queueid parse does not done in this patch.
>
> Why
Hi list,
I have set up a second instance with a second IP and separate config and
spool directories, but am stuck with the /var/lib/postfix/master.lock
file. I can not find where I can change this, so the second instance can
create it's own lockfile e.g. /var/lib/postfix/master2.lock
or /var/l
Yves Kreis:
> Dear,
>
> Can I use a canonical map like:
> if /^To: u...@domain\.com$/
> /^From: (".*" )*(.+)@(.+)$/ From: ${1}${2}+$...@anotherdomain.com
> endif
Dear Yves, please RTFM the pcre_table manpage.
if /pattern/flags
endif Match the input string against the patterns
Wouter van Marle:
> Hi list,
>
> I am trying to run a second instance of postfix for a separate queue
> (see my thread "Prioritising outgoing mail" for why). I have followed
> information on the Internet but still can't get it running.
>
> I have set up a second instance with a second IP and sepa
On 3/10/2009, mouss (mo...@ml.netoyen.net) wrote:
> it's not that hard. the hard part is to make sure that how recalls only
> recalls his own mail. This is easy via a web interface which requires
> user authentication (aka webmail). if everything is done by mail, then
> it's a bit harder unless you
Hi folks
I've got web application where users can send messages to each
other. Messages are e-mails and system base on postfix and roundcube
(web client). User A can send message to user B if B has A on his
contact list.
I need to configure postfix to check restrictions for both
s
Hello,
I need to receive mail to all winbind users except for those who are
"disabled" on NT4 domain controller and/or are in certain windows group.
How could this be accomplished?
--
Veiko
On 11 Mar 09, at 18:46, kemas wrote:
Hi list,
I have set up a second instance with a second IP and separate config
and
spool directories, but am stuck with the /var/lib/postfix/master.lock
file. I can not find where I can change this, so the second instance
can
create it's own lockfile
2009/3/11 Michał Łomnicki :
> Is it possible to create sender and recipient
> restrictions dynamic, where sender and recipient are selected by sql
> query?
Yes and no.
"Yes" because you can use MySQL for a lookup table.
http://www.postfix.org/mysql_table.5.html
"No" because I don't believ
I have a file /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre that contains lines like this:
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.org$/${1}+$...@example.org
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.net$/${1}+$...@example.net
etc etc. This is to allow the _ to act as an additional address
extens
Micha? ?omnicki wrote:
Is it possible to create sender and recipient
restrictions dynamic, where sender and recipient are selected by sql
query?
Yes, you can do this with a policy server. Some pre-built
policy servers can be found here:
http://www.postfix.org/addon.html#policy
Policy
Hello,
We are testing a new mail system and I want to duplicate mail flow to the
new system at the same time allow flow to the exist system.
/ - CurrentMailhost.example.com (running Postfix)
@example.com -
\ - NewMailhost.example.com (running Postfix)
> Yes, you can do this with a policy server. Some pre-built
Thank you Noel. That's exactly what I was looking for.
Michael
On 3/11/2009 9:38 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> I have a file /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre that contains lines like this:
>
> /^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
> /^(.*)_(.*)@example.org$/${1}+$...@example.org
> /^(.*)_(.*)@example.net$/${1}+$...@example.net
>
> etc etc. This is to al
Greetings,
I am installing a Postfix Server, and I am having trouble setting up a
spam filter with Spamassassin.
I installed Postfix and it is working fine using virtual domains (I
followed these instructions:
http://www.howtoforge.com/linux_postfix_virtual_hosting). I also
installed Spamas
LuKreme escribió:
On 10-Mar-2009, at 18:15, mme...@gmail.com wrote:
when postfix wants to send a bounce message (notifying the
rejected message), my mail system will always try to deliver it
directly to the recipient server (i'm not using a relayhost)... i
think i need to change <> to _r
On 3/11/2009 10:44 AM, mme...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yeah i know. It's better to discard the message.
Actually, its best to REJECT the message...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Philip wrote:
Hello,
We are testing a new mail system and I want to duplicate mail flow to
the new system at the same time allow flow to the exist system.
To send mail to an additional destination, you need to add an
additional recipient. Use virtual_alias_maps to add a second
recipient,
I just had a ticket come in regards to a user who just last week
started receiving a crazy amount of spam emails that he has never had
an issue with. I checked the mail logs (/var/log/mail.log) and was
unable to find anything. I checked the spam emails the user still had
on his client and copied th
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:19:45 -0400, Carlos Williams
wrote:
> I just had a ticket come in regards to a user who just last week
> started receiving a crazy amount of spam emails that he has never had
> an issue with. I checked the mail logs (/var/log/mail.log) and was
> unable to find anything.
The
Carlos Williams wrote, at 03/11/2009 11:19 AM:
> I just had a ticket come in regards to a user who just last week
> started receiving a crazy amount of spam emails that he has never had
> an issue with. I checked the mail logs (/var/log/mail.log) and was
> unable to find anything. I checked the spa
Carlos Williams wrote:
I just had a ticket come in regards to a user who just last week
Now I am wondering why I am unable to find any of these messages in my logs:
mail:~# cat /var/log/mail.log | grep -i 203.217.121.52
mail:~# cat /var/log/mail.log | grep -i 3B3311FA41E0
mail:~# cat /var/log/m
> "Yes" because you can use MySQL for a lookup table.
> http://www.postfix.org/mysql_table.5.html
>
> "No" because I don't believe you can lookup the sender AND recipient
> at once for this kind of check. For that you need a policy server.
"No" because postfix can pass only one argument to where
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 07:38:25AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> I have a file /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre that contains lines like this:
>
> /^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
> /^(.*)_(.*)@example.org$/${1}+$...@example.org
> /^(.*)_(.*)@example.net$/${1}+$...@example.net
>
> etc
Hi List,
I have Postfix 2.3.3 with amavis-new, spamassassin and clamav and am
trying to block a group of users from sending to two internal maillists
called staff and pupils.
I have two files, restricted_maillists which is in the format:
pup...@bordengrammar.kent.sch.uk restricted_mail_lis
Micha? ?omnicki wrote:
"Yes" because you can use MySQL for a lookup table.
http://www.postfix.org/mysql_table.5.html
"No" because I don't believe you can lookup the sender AND recipient
at once for this kind of check. For that you need a policy server.
"No" because postfix can pass only one ar
Hello,
I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses Postfix
as MTA.
On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to transmit
messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit the
messages. In particular, it looks up DNS for MX of destination domai
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I need to use 'mail()' PHP function on a UNIX system, which uses Postfix
as MTA.
On Linux systems, mail() function use the 'sendmail' program to transmit
messages. And so, my PHP program uses postfix setup to transmit the
messages. In particular, it looks up DNS f
Can I use Postfix as a host for email forwarding?
The scenario I envision is an Alum or Faculty member authenticates to a web
portal, then tells the system where to forward their email. All email destined
for Staff would go to our current email system.
Any thoughts are welcome.
Regards,
Jef
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:35:26PM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> Can I use Postfix as a host for email forwarding?
>
> The scenario I envision is an Alum or Faculty member authenticates to
> a web portal, then tells the system where to forward their email. All
> email destined for Staff would go
Thank you Viktor for your reply.
We already have an anti-spam/anti-virus system sitting in front of our mail
system. Would this then work if Postfix were positioned similarly?
>>> Victor Duchovni 3/11/2009 1:48 PM >>>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:35:26PM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> Can I use
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Jeff Bernier wrote:
> We already have an anti-spam/anti-virus system sitting in front of our
> mail system. Would this then work if Postfix were positioned similarly?
Yes, but is it sufficiently effective? Does it reject during SMTP or
quarantine after? T
Hi people
Im with a biggest problem in my postfix server because today the people
can't use the server to send any mail only receive. This error is produced
how to randomand every time in the logs appears the same
Mar 11 19:24:53 correo postfix/smtpd[27553]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
ip-89-102-9
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:02:55PM +0100, deconya wrote:
> Hi people
>
> Im with a biggest problem in my postfix server because today the people
> can't use the server to send any mail only receive. This error is produced
> how to randomand every time in the logs appears the same
>
> Mar 11 19:2
HI
until yesterday all were good. In the main.cf my configuration actually is
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/overquota
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/clientes
re
Hello.
Is it possible to create different throttling thresholds based on the
domain or MTA that is connecting to postfix? Ie, allow google.com
to send freely, but limit suspectdomain.com to a certain number of
messages/connections per minute/hour/day etc.
Thank you.
stevem
On 11.03.2009, at 11:49, Wietse Venema wrote:
Yves Kreis:
Dear,
Can I use a canonical map like:
if /^To: u...@domain\.com$/
/^From: (".*" )*(.+)@(.+)$/ From: ${1}${2}+$...@anotherdomain.com
endif
Dear Yves, please RTFM the pcre_table manpage.
if /pattern/flags
endif Match the
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:37:17PM +0100, deconya wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/overquota
> permit_mynetworks
> permit_sasl_authenticated
> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/clientes
> reject_unaut
I'm using spf-milter-python, which uses an access map for refining the
SPF policy.
The file is formated as:
SPF-Fail: REJECT
SPF-Softfail: CBV
SPF-Neutral:OK
SPF-PermError: REJECT
SPF-Pass: OK
Running postmap on this gives:
postmap: warning: access, line 1: record is in "key
Chris Cameron wrote:
> I'm using spf-milter-python, which uses an access map for refining the
> SPF policy.
>
> The file is formated as:
>
> SPF-Fail: REJECT
>
If the lookup key you want is 'SPF-Fail' then do not put a colon.
Colons are normally only used in alias lookups with Postfix
In Ge
On 11-Mar-2009, at 08:27, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/11/2009 9:38 AM, LuKreme wrote:
I have a file /etc/postfix/virtual.pcre that contains lines like
this:
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.com$/${1}+$...@example.com
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.org$/${1}+$...@example.org
/^(.*)_(.*)@example.net$/${1}+$
On 11-Mar-2009, at 09:14, Noel Jones wrote:
You can optionally use a pcre smtp_generic_maps to rewrite the
recipient back to the original domain.
main.cf
smtp_generic_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/smtp_generic.pcre
smtp_generic.pcre:
/^(.*)@new\.example\.com$/ $...@example.com
This would need t
On 3/11/2009 3:55 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>> Sorry, not possible. Also the above defeats recipient validation for
>> email addresses with "_" in them, it is not recommended.
> Yep, I am aware of that. In this case, however, the ability to use a
> second delimiter far outweighs the lack of recipient va
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:04:38PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> If this ability (multiple
> recipient delimiters) was added, simply documenting this fact (about
> breaking recipient validation if any of the delimiters are allowed to be
> used in the actual email address) should be enough, no?
T
On Wednesday, March 11, 2009 at 21:02 CET,
LuKreme wrote:
> On 11-Mar-2009, at 09:14, Noel Jones wrote:
> >You can optionally use a pcre smtp_generic_maps to rewrite the
> >recipient back to the original domain.
> >main.cf
> >smtp_generic_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/smtp_generic.pcre
> >
> >s
LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Mar-2009, at 09:14, Noel Jones wrote:
You can optionally use a pcre smtp_generic_maps to rewrite the
recipient back to the original domain.
main.cf
smtp_generic_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/smtp_generic.pcre
smtp_generic.pcre:
/^(.*)@new\.example\.com$/ $...@example.com
Th
Hi List,
I have Postfix 2.3.3 with amavis-new, spamassassin and clamav and am
trying to block a group of users from sending to two internal maillists
called staff and pupils.
I have two files, restricted_maillists which is in the format:
pup...@bordengrammar.kent.sch.uk restricted_mail_lis
stevem wrote:
Hello.
Is it possible to create different throttling thresholds based on the
domain or MTA that is connecting to postfix? Ie, allow google.com
to send freely, but limit suspectdomain.com to a certain number of
messages/connections per minute/hour/day etc.
Thank you.
stevem
If y
I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
think about things like "dynamicmaps" and other oddities of the Ubuntu
Postfix configuration.
TIA
JL
On 11-Mar-2009, at 14:24, Noel Jones wrote:
No, this is on the existing gateway. Generic rewriting is for
outgoing mail.
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html#generic
Ah. Too bad there is not a similar option for local only mail, then I
could use it to solve my multiple del
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:40:26PM -0500, KLaM Postmaster wrote:
> I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
> look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
> I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
> think about things like "dy
Fair enough. However the documents for spf-milter-python state that I
could also do:
SPF-Neutral:aol.com REJECT
SPF-Softfail:aol.comREJECT
Would that still be valid considering "SPF-Softfail:aol.com" could be
seen as just one string?
Thank you for your help,
Chris
On Wed, Mar 11, 20
On 11-Mar-2009, at 15:40, KLaM Postmaster wrote:
I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
Yes, everything in Debian is 'somewhat odd'. It's what makes Deb Deb.
I don't want to start a flame war, but I would li
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:23:30PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> > On Mar 10, 2009, at 9:27 PM, Curtis wrote:
> >
> >> I've got the catch-all feature explained here working just fine...
> >>
> >> http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.htm
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:51:02 -0600 Chris Cameron wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> wrote:
>> Chris Cameron wrote:
>>> I'm using spf-milter-python, which uses an access map for refining the
>>> SPF policy.
>>>
>>> The file is formated as:
>>>
>>> SPF-Fail: RE
Curtis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Victor Duchovni
transport:
bo...@example.com error:5.1.1 Invalid recipient address
address.invalid error:5.1.1 Invalid recipient address
this bounces the address when submitted locally.
Perhaps it's a problem with m
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:40:26 -0500 KLaM Postmaster
wrote:
>I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
>look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
>I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
>think about things like "dynamicmaps"
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:21:25PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> Curtis wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Victor Duchovni
>>>transport:
>>>bo...@example.com error:5.1.1 Invalid recipient address
>>>address.invalid error:5.1.1 Invalid recipient address
>>>
>>
Victor Duchovni:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:40:26PM -0500, KLaM Postmaster wrote:
>
> > I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
> > look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
> > I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
>
KLaM Postmaster wrote:
> I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
> look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
> I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
> think about things like "dynamicmaps" and other oddities of the Ubuntu
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:18:02AM -0500, KLaM Postmaster wrote:
> From the replies that I have received so far, I get the impression that
> while no one has anything bad to say about the Ubuntu implementation of
> Postfix, nobody is very enthusiastic.
No, it is a fine Postfix port. There is no r
* KLaM Postmaster :
> I am thinking of switching to Ubuntu 8.10 LTS server, however when I
> look at the Postfix configuration it seems somewhat odd.
> I don't want to start a flame war, but I would like to hear what people
> think about things like "dynamicmaps" and other oddities of the Ubuntu
>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Costin Guşă wrote:
>>
>> however i'm wondering if my proposed implementation would *really*
>> catch not only all relayed mail but also internal clients sending mail
>> to internal clients ?
>
> To only catch outbound mail, use something like thi
71 matches
Mail list logo
