Hello,
I have a number of networks from which is possible to use my mail
gateway system (Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL) to relay email messages
(directly through a mail client or through another MTA that uses my mail
gateway system as smart host). The mail gateway system moreover is used
as MX record
2009/2/17 mouss :
> $ maildrop -v
> maildrop 2.0.4 Copyright 1998-2005 Double Precision, Inc.
> GDBM extensions enabled.
> Courier Authentication Library extension enabled.
> Maildir quota extension enabled.
> This program is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> License. See COPY
Hello!
I am using Address verification now with ~90% success (using it over a
year now).
The only flaw i didn't find a solution yet is the following:
When a server rejects an e-mail address with 5xx, mine rejects it only
with 4xx. But! I would like to reject them with 4xx if the foreign
ser
Halassy Zoltán schrieb:
> When a server rejects an e-mail address with 5xx, mine rejects it only
> with 4xx. But! I would like to reject them with 4xx if the foreign
> server sends 4xx, or unreachable, DNS failures etc... Is this possible?
Take a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unve
Halassy Zolt??n:
> Hello!
>
> I am using Address verification now with ~90% success (using it over a
> year now).
>
> The only flaw i didn't find a solution yet is the following:
>
> When a server rejects an e-mail address with 5xx, mine rejects it only
> with 4xx. But! I would like to reject
Take a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unverified_recipient_reject_code
(sorry pushed the send button accidentally previously)
Take a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unverified_recipient_reject_code
> man 5 postconf
>
>reject_unverified_recipient
Yes, i know this one exists. But i guess this one would reject mails
with 5xx, when the foreig
Halassy Zoltán írta:
(sorry pushed the send button accidentally previously)
Take a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unverified_recipient_reject_code
> man 5 postconf
>
>reject_unverified_recipient
Yes, i know this one exists. But i guess this one would reject mails
--
С уважением,
Пименов Д.А.
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:50:49 +
> Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop
> From: wyldf...@gmail.com
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>
> 2009/2/17 mouss :
> > $ maildrop -v
> > maildrop 2.0.4 Copyright 1998-2005 Double Precision, Inc.
> > GDBM extensions enabled.
> > Courier Authentication Libr
Sorry for taking long ... tried to do some research on the hints I got
from over here but failed miserably... below are my comments ...
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:13:32 +0100
> From: mo...@ml.netoyen.net
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Postfix + Maildrop
>
> sim085 a écrit :
> >
I am not receiving from ukranz-r...@unfccc.int
Why? - reject_unverified_sender??
== maillog =
Feb 17 09:02:30 guarani postfix/smtpd[18968]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[62.225.2.61]:550 5.1.7 : Sender address
rejected: undeliverable address: host svmviruswall01.unfcc
2009/2/18 Simon Aquilina :
> What command did you use to install maildrop? Also did you have the
> configure maildrop to use the authmysqlrc file? if so where?
aptitude install courier-maildrop
aptitude install courier-authlib-mysql
authmysqlrc then needs to be completed with MySQL server details
Alexandre Balistrieri wrote:
I am not receiving from ukranz-r...@unfccc.int
Why? - reject_unverified_sender??
== maillog =
Feb 17 09:02:30 guarani postfix/smtpd[18968]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[62.225.2.61]:550 5.1.7 : Sender address
rejected: undeliverable addr
Thanks for the help guys, I was unaware of that option and have no
idea why I enabled it in the first place. Sorry about that.
--
Sincerely
Erik Paulsen Skålerud
Halassy Zoltán wrote:
Halassy Zoltán írta:
(sorry pushed the send button accidentally previously)
Take a look at
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#unverified_recipient_reject_code
> man 5 postconf
>
>reject_unverified_recipient
Yes, i know this one exists. But i guess this o
Noel,
Thanks for pointing out the obvious!!!
I had my head in the weeds. I'm in the processes of setting up a valid DNS
entry for the authoritative query and it should then connect to my rbldnsd
server.
Charles
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:39:15 -0600
> From: njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
> To: george
Jim Seymour wrote:
Hi All,
I'm simplifiying my life. Amonst other things, that means I'm dropping
my business class DSL circuit and all of my involvement in projects,
documentation, anti-spam efforts, etc.
If somebody *qualified* wants to officially take over maintenance of
Pflogsumm, please s
I read this page http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html but I am
not having any luck getting my pipe set up.
I want to make it so all mail destined for a particular subdomain is
run through a script and then discarded.
The 'all mail for a subdomain' requirement makes me think I need to
use the
Jon Drukman:
> I read this page http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html but I am
> not having any luck getting my pipe set up.
>
> I want to make it so all mail destined for a particular subdomain is
> run through a script and then discarded.
For that, FILTER_README is not applicable (it delver
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /etc/postfix/example-recipients
>o...@example.com whatever
>t...@example.com whatever
>
> This is a relay domain setup. Virtual aliases solve a different problem.
could i use a virtual alias to relay an entire domain to a si
Hi,
I'm looking for a good solution to make my postfix server operate faster.
My setup is Postfix + Policyd-weight + fail2ban, but nothing helps under
heavy load, and the problem is not with the server performance (CPU load
is not so high, about 30%), the problem is in the number of
smtp connect
Jon Drukman:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > /etc/postfix/example-recipients
> >o...@example.com whatever
> >t...@example.com whatever
> >
> > This is a relay domain setup. Virtual aliases solve a different problem.
>
> could i use a virtual alias to r
Alexey V Paramonov:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a good solution to make my postfix server operate faster.
> My setup is Postfix + Policyd-weight + fail2ban, but nothing helps under
> heavy load, and the problem is not with the server performance (CPU load
> is not so high, about 30%), the problem is
Simon Aquilina a écrit :
>[snip]
>>
>> >
>> > Enterting the command maildrop -V 4 -d sysad...@mydomain.com < 1 return
>> > the following:
>> > base 1: No such file or directory.
>>
>> well, you asked it to read from a file named "1". use "< /dev/null"
>> instead.
>
> I did as you suggested and th
Alexey V Paramonov wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a good solution to make my postfix server operate faster.
> My setup is Postfix + Policyd-weight + fail2ban, but nothing helps under
> heavy load, and the problem is not with the server performance (CPU load
> is not so high, about 30%), the probl
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> i followed your instructions but i am getting "status=bounced (unknown
>> user: "input")" when i try to send to in...@in.mydomain.com
>
> You still have it configured as virtual domain. Don't do that.
I don't. I even removed the virtual_
Jon Drukman:
> still getting this
> to=, relay=local, delay=0.05,
This mail is sent to LOCAL not PIPE. Your transport map is not working.
Wieste
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Jon Drukman:
>> still getting this
>> to=, relay=local, delay=0.05,
>
> This mail is sent to LOCAL not PIPE. Your transport map is not working.
$ cat transport
in.thismoment.com parsemail:
$ grep parsemail master.cf
parsemail unix -
Jon Drukman:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Jon Drukman:
> >> still getting this
> >> to=, relay=local, delay=0.05,
> >
> > This mail is sent to LOCAL not PIPE. Your transport map is not working.
>
> $ cat transport
> in.thismoment.com parsemail:
>
> $ grep pa
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> what am i missing?
>
> Are the transport map lookups configured?
>$ postconf -n transport_maps
that was it. for some reason that option is not listed in the default
main.cf on my box.
thanks!
-jsd-
Hi,
I found an email from Noel Jones:
>>At 09:51 AM 8/2/2007, Marshal Newrock wrote:
>>If not, what do I need to do in order to use header and body
>>checks to reject mail after it has been scanned with the milter?
>>
>>Header_checks does not inspect headers added by milters in the same instance
Charles Account wrote:
Hi,
I found an email from Noel Jones:
>>At 09:51 AM 8/2/2007, Marshal Newrock wrote:
>>If not, what do I need to do in order to use header and body
>>checks to reject mail after it has been scanned with the milter?
>>
>>Header_checks does not inspect headers added by
I need to delay all outbound email, not specific to destination
domains. I have tried to make the smtp_destination_rate_delay = 180
but I believe that must work in conjunction with specific domains
(please someone tell me if that is the case because the documentation,
although it says one sho
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> what am i missing?
>>
>> Are the transport map lookups configured?
>>$ postconf -n transport_maps
>
> that was it. for some reason that option is not listed in the default
> main.c
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
> unsuccessful delivery from the outside:
> Feb 18 15:39:41 181379-web1 postfix/smtpd[30983]: NOQUEUE: reject:
> RCPT from wf-out-1314.google.com[209.85.200.175]: 550 5.1.1
> : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
> local recipient table;
Jon Drukman:
> : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
> local recipient table; from=
USE relay_domains and relay_recipient_maps
NOT virtual_alias_*
NOT virtual_mailbox_*
NOT mydestination
I recently started bouncing email because (it appears) I had a mixture
of space-indentation and tab-indentation on the multi-line $mydestinations
line.
Should postfix really be doing this? It seems straightforward to me
to treat all whitespace the same, and it would prevent a mail-losing
error li
Travis:
> I recently started bouncing email because (it appears) I had a mixture
> of space-indentation and tab-indentation on the multi-line $mydestinations
> line.
>
> Should postfix really be doing this? It seems straightforward to me
> to treat all whitespace the same, and it would prevent a
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
> I need to delay all outbound email, not specific to destination domains.
> I have tried to make the smtp_destination_rate_delay = 180
This increases the delay that is inserted between individual deliveries to
the same destination via the smtp(8) delivery agen
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Travis wrote:
> I recently started bouncing email because (it appears) I had a mixture
> of space-indentation and tab-indentation on the multi-line $mydestinations
> line.
Show logs and output of the following command:
% postconf mydestination
--
Sahil Tandon
Thank you for your prompt reply.
I have a postfix smtp server which connects directly to the internet and
does not relay mail through an ISP.
I am working on a project in which -- depending on the level of the
users subscription -- either their mail is delayed for at least 2 hours
or it is s
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
> Thank you for your prompt reply.
No problem, but please do not top-post; place all future replies *below*
quoted text. Thanks.
> I am working on a project in which -- depending on the level of the
> users subscription -- either their mail is delayed for at
Thanks for the lesson, much appreciated.
secondary question, would I be better off using LMTP rather than SMTP
for the amavisd.
JLA
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
Thank you for your prompt reply.
No problem, but please do not top-post; place all future replies *below*
quoted text. Thanks.
I am working on a project in which -- depending on the level of the
users subscription -- either
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for your prompt reply.
>>
>> No problem, but please do not top-post; place all future replies *below*
>> quoted text. Thanks.
>>
>>> I am working on a project in which -- depending on the level of the
>>
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
Thank you for your prompt reply.
No problem, but please do not top-post; place all future replies *below*
quoted text. Thanks.
I am working on a project in which -- depending
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
Thank you for your prompt reply.
No problem, but please do not top-post; place all future replies *below*
quoted text. Thanks.
I am working on a project in which -- depending
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:56:05 jeffs wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
> >> Thank you for your prompt reply.
> >
> > No problem, but please do not top-post; place all future replies *below*
> > quoted text. Thanks.
> >
> >> I am working on a project in whic
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:56:05 jeffs wrote:
> > Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
> > >> Thank you for your prompt reply.
> > >
> > > No problem, but please do not top-post; place all future replies *below*
> > > quoted
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Melvyn Sopacua
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org, je...@speakeasy.net
> Sent: 18-Feb-09, 20:35:59
> Subject: Re: delay all outbound mail
>
> On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:56:05 jeffs wrote:
> > Sahil Tandon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
jeffs wrote:
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, jeffs wrote:
Thank you for your prompt reply.
No problem, but please do not top-post; place all future replies *below*
quoted text. Thanks.
I am working on a project in which -- depending on the level of the
users subscript
The docs at http://www.postfix.org mention several features available in
postfix 2.6(experimental).
Where is the complete changelog of postfix 2.6 available
smtpd_delay_reject = no ?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Alexey V Paramonov
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a good solution to make my postfix server operate faster.
> My setup is Postfix + Policyd-weight + fail2ban, but nothing helps under
> heavy load, and the problem is not with the server pe
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Rocco Scappatura
wrote:
> My aim, anyway, is to apply a such policy for outgoing messages
> (including internal-to-internal messages). So I have to define a group
> which contains the IPs enabled for relay through my mail server.
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions =
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 17:45:20 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> My point was to implement the delay based on the OP's criteria *outside* of
> Postfix. Whether this is done in the same application the OP mentioned or
> another one (say, a policy service as you mention below) is an interesting
> discu
* ram :
> The docs at http://www.postfix.org mention several features available in
> postfix 2.6(experimental).
>
> Where is the complete changelog of postfix 2.6 available
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/*.HISTORY
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de)
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 19:32:53 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> I won't make any claims as to the correctness or efficiency of this
> approach, but one way that I've seen this done is to store a record in
> the database immediately, and then have a (cron) PHP script running
> every 5 minutes or
58 matches
Mail list logo
