I did the modification and it seems it
work better. Since that modification I got no message rejected from
yahoo.
1. Could you please explain to me why should the RBL
checks be done before Sender Address Verification? And why it is not
advisable to do SAV at all?
2. It is correct that my
ddaas a écrit :
> I did the modification and it seems it work better. Since that
> modification I got no message rejected from yahoo.
>
> 1. Could you please explain to me why should the RBL checks be done
> before Sender Address Verification? And why it is not advisable to do
> SAV at all?
>
> 2
Zitat von Silas Boyd-Wickizer :
Why do you believe that this should use 100% of ALL Cpus?
If you look at your synthetic test then you will likely find that
there are at any point in time only a few mail receiving processes
and mail delivering processes, and that these processes will all
be wait
Justin Piszcz a écrit :
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>> You are doing Sender Address Verification (reject_unverified_sender)
>> before doing RBL checks. Fix this. Do the RBL checks first, and consider
>> not doing SAV at all, but if you do use it, do SAV *last*.
>>
>
>>
post...@corwyn.net a écrit :
>
>
> OK, so I've become intrigued with recipient delimiters.
>
> My users are currently stored in a mysql database, 'postfix'. The table
> format is as postfixadmin sets it up, so in the username is the user
> email address u...@example.com
>
> Before I started t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
after having implemented dynamic aliases using ldap I have the
following problem:
I want to hold mails for a specific recipient which is an alias to
multiple addresses so admin interaction is required to send to this
alias. Problem i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Additionally here is a log file excerpt of such a delivery:
Feb 12 12:39:43 [postfix/smtpd] connect from
e181105164.adsl.alicedsl.de[85.181.105.164]
Feb 12 12:39:44 [postfix/smtpd] setting up TLS connection from
e181105164.adsl.alicedsl.de[85.181
Hello list,
is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
Background:
Many customers are using our SMTP infrastructure (opportunistic TLS is
active). Now one customer wants to enforce TLS to a certain destination;
can I do this without affecting all other customers (who might as w
Hi everybody!
I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from envelope
mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help me, please?
Urban Hillebrand:
> Hello list,
>
> is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
Yes. Use "check_sender_access" and "reject_plaintext_session".
Wietse
> Background:
> Many customers are using our SMTP infrastructure (opportunistic TLS is
> active). Now one customer want
Petr Hude?ek:
> Hi everybody!
> I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from
> envelope mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help
> me, please?
Use PREPEND actions in access maps.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.5.html
http://www.post
Hello All,
I work on a project where we annotate emails coming through a mail server.
By annotation I mean attaching additional possibly useful information to
email body based on the email content. Annotation is enacted selectively
based on users preferences.
What is your opinion, what is the bes
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:13:19AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Urban Hillebrand:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
>
> Yes. Use "check_sender_access" and "reject_plaintext_session".
Thank you Wietse, but isn´t this a smtpD setting? My problem
Urban Hillebrand:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:13:19AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Urban Hillebrand:
> > > Hello list,
> > >
> > > is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
> >
> > Yes. Use "check_sender_access" and "reject_plaintext_session".
>
> Thank you Wietse, but is
* Zoltan Balogh :
> Hello All,
>
> I work on a project where we annotate emails coming through a mail server.
> By annotation I mean attaching additional possibly useful information to
> email body based on the email content. Annotation is enacted selectively
> based on users preferences.
>
> Wha
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Curtis:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm looking for a safe way to re-inject an archived queue file that
>> was backed up and removed (via postsuper) from the hold queue. (Not
>> just this once, but on a regular basis.) I realize that it would be
>> possib
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:51:20AM -0700, Curtis wrote:
> So, on a box that I know has nothing else feeding into the maildrop
> queue, it would be safe to skip the step of dropping it in the idle
> queue of a second instance (on the same filesystem) and running
> "postsuper -s" to get a properly n
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:33:35AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > > is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
>
> This would have to be simulated with sender_dependent_relayhost_maps.
> Specify a Postfix instance that encrypts all outbound mail. Postfix
> multi-instance supp
It happened again :(
Not in connection with backup, but in another situation with high load.
Output of ps
http://div.org/postfix_debug/postfix.processes.txt
http://div.org/postfix_debug/stack_trace.28848 - qmgr
http://div.org/postfix_debug/stack_trace.7175 - smtp
http://div.org/postfix_debug/
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:33:35AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > > > is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
> >
> > This would have to be simulated with sender_dependent_relayhost_maps.
> > Specify a Postfix instance that encrypts all outbound mail.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:18:56AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /etc/postfix/sender_access:
>/(.*)/ prepend X-Envelope-From: <$1>
>
> /etc/postfix/check_recipient_access:
>/(.*)/ prepend X-Envelope-To: <$1>
>
> Beware, this breaks the privacy of BCC recipients.
Note also that the add
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:51:20AM -0700, Curtis wrote:
>
>> So, on a box that I know has nothing else feeding into the maildrop
>> queue, it would be safe to skip the step of dropping it in the idle
>> queue of a second instance (on the sa
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Curtis wrote:
> Perfect. Does the pickup command have a trigger like qmgr that I can
> use with postkick to get the queue file picked up from the maildrop
> queue immediately? I'm guessing not since there's no mention of it in
> the man page, but I thought I'd ch
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Petr Hudeček wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from
> envelope mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help
> me, please?
I believe by default there is an: X-Original-To header which
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:46:51AM -0700, Curtis wrote:
> Perfect. Does the pickup command have a trigger like qmgr that I can
> use with postkick to get the queue file picked up from the maildrop
> queue immediately? I'm guessing not since there's no mention of it in
> the man page, but I thoug
Christoph Erdle wrote:
I want to hold mails for a specific recipient which is an alias to
multiple addresses so admin interaction is required to send to this
alias. Problem is that the mail is now held twice (following is the
output of mailq and releasing the message):
Feb 12 12:40:08 [postfi
At 04:28 AM 2/12/2009, mouss wrote:
recipient_delimiter works "out of the box". there is no need to change
your tables, your sql statements nor add users.
The problem is I don't know what the "out of the box" behavior should be.
If I set recipient_delimiter = + then mail to u...@example.com,
Victor Duchovni:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:46:51AM -0700, Curtis wrote:
>
> > Perfect. Does the pickup command have a trigger like qmgr that I can
> > use with postkick to get the queue file picked up from the maildrop
> > queue immediately? I'm guessing not since there's no mention of it in
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:33:57PM -0500, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
> At 04:28 AM 2/12/2009, mouss wrote:
>> recipient_delimiter works "out of the box". there is no need to change
>> your tables, your sql statements nor add users.
>
> The problem is I don't know what the "out of the box" behavior
Hello,
Is there a way to check the result of a iteration(email address) on
virtual_alias_maps(cleanup) against the local_recipient_maps (smtp) ?
Best Regards
Jakjr
On 2009-02-11, 09:32, Noel Jones wrote:
> Andy Spiegl wrote:
>
>> Hm, but I don't have the list of valid recipients. :-(
>>
>> All I have is the list of valid LOCAL recipients. Everything else
>> I have to relay to the MX of example.com...
>
> If the receiving server rejects unknown recipients dur
Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I
have multiple entries, but not sure how many of them actually maintained. Is
there one single place where I can find such a list. Any help is greatly
appreciated.
smtpd_helo_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_non_
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:02:03PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
> Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I
> have multiple entries, but not sure how many of them actually maintained. Is
> there one single place where I can find such a list. Any help is greatly
> appr
At 12:47 PM 2/12/2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:33:57PM -0500, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
> At 04:28 AM 2/12/2009, mouss wrote:
>> recipient_delimiter works "out of the box". there is no need to change
>> your tables, your sql statements nor add users.
This up to your LDA
Andy Spiegl:
> But I couldn't get it to work. I set:
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unauth_destination,
> hash:/etc/postfix/recipient_access
Meaning: do not examine the access map if the client is in mynetworks.
Wietse
jakjr wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to check the result of a iteration(email address) on
virtual_alias_maps(cleanup) against the local_recipient_maps (smtp) ?
Best Regards
Jakjr
No. If you describe your problem maybe someone can give some
helpful suggestions.
-- Noel Jones
http://stats.dnsbl.com/
As victor said, ZEN is usually enough for most people, but it's always
good to know why you're not using the rest.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
> Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I
> have multiple entries, but
Including every solicited bulk email. They usually create unique
bounce addresses to track dead target mailboxes etc.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Michael Katz
wrote:
> Ilo Lorusso wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> is their a way I can reject messages when its from address does not
>> match the envelope
Mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a �crit :
> [snip]
>
> This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
> alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a
second map.
>
I don't think so. I used this. I don't remember the details, but the
idea is that you can often g
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:07 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:02:03PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
>
> > Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I
> > have multiple entries, but not sure how many of them actually maintained. Is
> > there one
post...@corwyn.net a écrit :
> [snip]
>
> So while recipient_delimited works "out of the box" it doesn't quite do
> what I want (hence why I provided not only what wasn't working, but a
> detailed explanation of what I wanted to solve.)
>
but you didn't talk about folders in your post, did you?
Rik a écrit :
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:07 -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:02:03PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
>>
>>> Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I
>>> have multiple entries, but not sure how many of them actually maintained. I
Hello everyone,
I created a second cleanup for the submission service to have separate
header checks from incoming emails.
cleanup-out unix n - - - 0 cleanup
-o header_checks=pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks-out
-o body_checks=pcre:/etc/postfix/bod
Victor Duchovni pisze:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:02:03PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I
have multiple entries, but not sure how many of them actually maintained. Is
there one single place where I can find such a list. Any
Hi,
We're building a box to run two postfix instances to receive and send high
volume of emails. According to the documentation it's better to run the two
instances on separate disks for performance reason. I'm trying to understand
how exactly does the disk I/O affect the postfix performance? By s
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Petr Hude?ek wrote:
> I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from
> envelope mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help
> me, please?
Would Return-Path: and X-Original-To: suffice? Postfix adds these headers by
default.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 12.02.2009 um 18:02 schrieb Noel Jones:
Christoph Erdle wrote:
I want to hold mails for a specific recipient which is an alias to
multiple addresses so admin interaction is required to send to this
alias. Problem is that the mail is now held
47 matches
Mail list logo
