Strange problem with pickup process (maybe just a coincidence)

Hi. I have a strange problem monitoring the "pickup" process: we have a monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with "pickup process not in memory" (master and qmgr seems to continue running). When we enter the machine, we notice that pickup is really in memory, but after that alarm, eve

Problem with postfix and amavisd-new

I have some problem with postfix and amavisd-new. Postfix is configured as a mx backup and use amavisd-new to check about spam. I setup amavisd-new to rejict messages that are disoverd as SPAM, but seem that postfix bounce this messages and sent a sender non-delivery notification. Why this

Re: Strange problem with pickup process (maybe just a coincidence)

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Santiago Romero wrote: > I have a strange problem monitoring the "pickup" process: we have a > monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with "pickup process not in > memory" What is the meaning of this message? > Does the "wake up" restart the proc

Re: Strange problem with pickup process (maybe just a coincidence)

Bastian Blank escribió: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Santiago Romero wrote: I have a strange problem monitoring the "pickup" process: we have a monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with "pickup process not in memory" What is the meaning of this message? Th

Re: How to allow mails from some other servers to pass: reject_sender_login_mismatch

Hi, yes, you are right using mynetworks is ok. I also though for this way. I just didn't understood from beginning why it didn't work with access file, but now is clear. Thanks! On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 04:35 -0500, Digest of postfix-users list wrote: > your access file is used for check_SENDER_acc

Whitelist final draft

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I now have added dnswl to my config to whitelist. Can I get some comments it looks okay please? smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/check_backscatterer, check_sen

Re: Problem with postfix and amavisd-new

On 2/11/2009, Vittorio Manfredini (vitto...@vitsoft.bz) wrote: > I setup amavisd-new to rejict messages that are disoverd as SPAM, but > seem that postfix bounce this messages and sent a sender non-delivery > notification. Never bounce a message once its been accepted. Either setup amavisd-new as

Re: how to accept some addresses but relay the rest?

On 2009-02-10, 12:00, Noel Jones wrote: > This should get you started: Thanks! > # relay_recipients > ... list of valid recipients at example.com ... > us...@example.com OK > us...@example.com OK > ... Hm, but I don't have the list of valid recipients. :-( All I have is the list of valid LOCAL

Re: Strange problem with pickup process (maybe just a coincidence)

Santiago Romero: > > Hi. > > I have a strange problem monitoring the "pickup" process: we have a > monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with "pickup process not in > memory" (master and qmgr seems to continue running). When we enter the There is no requirement that pickup runs 100% o

Re: how to accept some addresses but relay the rest?

On 2009-02-10, 18:51, João Miguel Neves wrote: >> I tried putting this into /etc/postfix/virtual : >> >> example.com anything >> > @example.com anything > > You forgot the at-sign. Oops, really? In http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html I don't see the at-sign: /etc/postfix/virtual:

Re: Connection Refused

On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Jason Wohlford wrote: Is there a way to notify me (i.e. postmaster) when my smtpd_proxy_filter fails? I see in the logs where a "warning: connect to proxy service 127.0.0.1:10024: Connection refused" occurs. How do I get

Assistance with email error

Hello All, I have researched this without a 100% clear reason that an exchange server would return this error: The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected My guess is it's an invalid email address that we attempted to be delivered to, but I want to be p

Re: Connection Refused

Jason Wohlford schrieb: > I thought > 'notify_classes=bounce,delay,policy,protocol,resource,software' would do > the trick, but no luck. I have the default setting "notify_classes = resource, software" active and receive those notifications all the time. Check the value of error_notice_recipient

filtering mail

Hi is their a way I can reject messages when its from address does not match the envelope from address? using postfix ofcourse Thanks Regards Ilo

Re: filtering mail

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:21:39PM CET, Ilo Lorusso said: > Hi > > > is their a way I can reject messages when its from address does not > match the envelope from address? > > using postfix ofcourse Bad idea. I'm just answering anemail with header from Ito Lorusso and envelop from owner-postfi

Re: filtering mail

Ilo Lorusso wrote: > Hi > > > is their a way I can reject messages when its from address does not > match the envelope from address? Doing that will drop tons of legit email. Mike Katz http://messagepartners.com > > using postfix ofcourse > > > Thanks > > Regards > > > Ilo > > >

Re: Assistance with email error

Joey wrote: Hello All, I have researched this without a 100% clear reason that an exchange server would return this error: The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected My guess is it’s an invalid email address that we attempted to be delivered to, but I w

Re: Problem with postfix and amavisd-new

Vittorio Manfredini wrote: > I have some problem with postfix and amavisd-new. > Postfix is configured as a mx backup and use amavisd-new to check > about spam. > > I setup amavisd-new to rejict messages that are disoverd as SPAM, but > seem that postfix bounce this messages and sent a sender non-d

Re: problem with virtual domains and mailman

Hi As I understod your posting I'd simply make an addenment to mydestination: mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, lists.telemar.se Copying your suggestion and I have my aliases files in my alias_maps: alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases

Re: Strange problem with pickup process (maybe just a coincidence)

There is no requirement that pickup runs 100% of the time. I don't know where you got this ill-conceived idea from. Opps. After my very first postfix install (last year), on a new server with no email traffic, I did a "postfix start" and noticed that only "master", "qmgr" and "pickup" ap

Re: problem with virtual domains and mailman

G?ran H?glund: > Hi > As I understod your posting I'd simply make an addenment to mydestination: > > mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, > lists.telemar.se > > Copying your suggestion and I have my aliases files in my alias_maps: > alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/u

Re: Strange problem with pickup process (maybe just a coincidence)

Santiago Romero: > > There is no requirement that pickup runs 100% of the time. I > > don't know where you got this ill-conceived idea from. > > > > Opps. > > After my very first postfix install (last year), on a new server with > no email traffic, I did a "postfix start" and noticed that o

Re: problem with virtual domains and mailman

Hi Ok this is the output, the mailman is a standard install right out of the box. # postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases append_dot_mydomain = no biff = no broken_sasl_auth_clien

451 Remote TLS ERROR - Connection closed by peer

When sending to nashfinch.com I get: Feb 11 16:23:36 mail postfix/smtp[22382]: setting up TLS connection to nashfinch.com.s5a1.psmtp.com[64.18.4.10]:25 Feb 11 16:23:37 mail postfix/smtp[22382]: Trusted TLS connection established to nashfinch.com.s5a1.psmtp.com[64.18.4.10]:25: TLSv1 with cipher AE

Re: how to accept some addresses but relay the rest?

Andy Spiegl wrote: On 2009-02-10, 18:51, João Miguel Neves wrote: I tried putting this into /etc/postfix/virtual : example.com anything @example.com anything You forgot the at-sign. Oops, really? In http://www.postfix.org/virtual.5.html I don't see the at-sign: /etc/postfix/virtua

Re: 451 Remote TLS ERROR - Connection closed by peer

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:27:07PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > When sending to nashfinch.com I get: > > Feb 11 16:23:36 mail postfix/smtp[22382]: setting up TLS connection to > nashfinch.com.s5a1.psmtp.com[64.18.4.10]:25 > > Feb 11 16:23:37 mail postfix/smtp[22382]: Trusted TLS connection >

Re: how to accept some addresses but relay the rest?

Andy Spiegl wrote: On 2009-02-10, 12:00, Noel Jones wrote: This should get you started: Thanks! # relay_recipients ... list of valid recipients at example.com ... us...@example.com OK us...@example.com OK ... Hm, but I don't have the list of valid recipients. :-( All I have is the list o

PATCH: postfix, dovecot auth and rip/lip

Can someone have a look at this patch for Postfix >= 2.5? The patch for Postfix 2.3 does not work because I had to add a "SASL mechanism filter" feature. Wietse *** xsasl_dovecot_server.c.orig Sun Mar 16 19:09:04 2008 --- xsasl_dovecot_server.c Wed Feb 11 10:26:37 2009 **

Re: Whitelist final draft

David Cottle wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I now have added dnswl to my config to whitelist. Can I get some comments it looks okay please? smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist, check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/check_ba

Re: problem with virtual domains and mailman

G?ran H?glund: > virtual_alias_maps = > proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf, > proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-mailbox-to-alias-maps.cf > hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases As I suspected, you are mixing local alias syntax with virtual alias syntax. The two have diffe

best book to learn on?

Hi, Looking to get educated on postfix, and I started browsing through amazons reviews. I've found the book 'The book of postfix' and that everyone seemed quite happy with it. But the problem is the book is from 2005 / 2006. Is this book still current? Or has there been enough revisions that I wo

postfix logs, spams and bounce messages

Hi there, Yahoo starts blocking e-mails from our server. It is possible that someone/somehow is sending spams. Please help me find what is sending spam from our server. First please explain to me the following logs (ourdomain is hosted on our server): Feb  3 14:45:57 softexp postfix/smtp

Re: best book to learn on?

Charlie wrote: Hi, Looking to get educated on postfix, and I started browsing through amazons reviews. I've found the book 'The book of postfix' and that everyone seemed quite happy with it. But the problem is the book is from 2005 / 2006. Is this book still current? Or has there been enough re

Re: postfix logs, spams and bounce messages

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:05:56PM +0200, ddaas wrote: >Feb 3 14:45:57 softexp postfix/smtpd[23394]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from >unknown[117.87.x.x]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host >[117.87.x.x] blocked using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org; >[1]http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?i

Re: postfix logs, spams and bounce messages

ddaas wrote: Hi there, Yahoo starts blocking e-mails from our server. It is possible that someone/somehow is sending spams. Please help me find what is sending spam from our server. First please explain to me the following logs (ourdomain is hosted on our server): Feb 3 14:45:57 softexp pos

postfix benchmark performance

Hello, I'm doing some experiments with a synthetic benchmark and postfix. My current postfix configuration can deliver ~3000 msg/sec to 1000 virtual mailboxes; however, the system (16 core/4x4 AMD opteron) is ~90% idle. All logs and queues reside in a RAM filesystem, so disk IO is not a bottl

Re: best book to learn on?

Noel Jones wrote: > Charlie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Looking to get educated on postfix, and I started browsing through >> amazons reviews. I've found the book 'The book of postfix' and that >> everyone seemed quite happy with it. But the problem is the book is from >> 2005 / 2006. >> >> Is this book st

Re: postfix benchmark performance

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:41:19PM -0500, Silas Boyd-Wickizer wrote: > Hello, I'm doing some experiments with a synthetic benchmark and > postfix. My current postfix configuration can deliver ~3000 > msg/sec to 1000 virtual mailboxes; however, the system (16 > core/4x4 AMD opteron) is ~90% idl

Re: problem with virtual domains and mailman

Hi Thanks that helped! Now i just have to get the listmanager deliver the mails ... But that is another list I assume. /GH Wietse Venema skrev: G?ran H?glund: virtual_alias_maps = proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf, proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-mailbox-to-ali

Re: postfix benchmark performance

> With 16 logical CPUs, in this configuration you'll find your CPU load > to be 1/16th of the theoretical maximum + overhead. Your report of 10% > is about right. The system has 16 physical execution units: four quad core AMD Opterons. In the configuration I described, 90% of total cycles are u

Mail Received But Not Delivered

This has not happened before: two messages sent to me, and received, but not delivered to my mailbox. Here's what the maillog shows: Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/qmgr[32715]: E4041AAE: from=, size=4572, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Feb 11 11:33:33 salmo postfix/qmgr[21684]: 8BA1AF50: from=, size=483

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

Rich Shepard wrote: This has not happened before: two messages sent to me, and received, but not delivered to my mailbox. Here's what the maillog shows: Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/qmgr[32715]: E4041AAE: from=, size=4572, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Feb 11 11:33:33 salmo postfix/qmgr[21684]: 8BA

Re: No reason not to use reject_unverified sender (was Re: reject_unverified_sender vs greylisting)

Paweł Leśniak a écrit : > mouss pisze: >> João Miguel Neves a écrit : >> >>> OK, I'll take that into consideration if I re-enable SAV. >>> >>> >> >> >> if you re-enable SAV, do as much checks as you can. the minimum is >> zen.spamhaus.org. but you can also use spamcop. >> >> it would also be

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote: What do you get with: grep E4041AAE /var/log/maillog Terry, Feb 9 11:43:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17963]: E4041AAE: client=vms173007pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.7] Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/cleanup[17966]: E4041AAE: message-id=<88ba18204f8d4137a8f4a4b0

Re: Redirect all mail from one domain to the same u...@otherdomain?

Jeff Weinberger a écrit : > [snip] > > This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other > alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a second map. > I don't think so. I used this. I don't remember the details, but the idea is that you can often get rid of flow c

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote: What do you get with: grep E4041AAE /var/log/maillog Terry, Feb 9 11:43:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17963]: E4041AAE: client=vms173007pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.7] Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/cleanup[17966]: E4041AAE: message-id=<88b

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote: What do you get with: grep E4041AAE /var/log/maillog Terry, Feb 9 11:43:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17963]: E4041AAE: client=vms173007pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.7] Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/cleanup[17966]: E4041AAE: message-id=<88b

Re: postfix benchmark performance

Silas Boyd-Wickizer: > Hello, I'm doing some experiments with a synthetic benchmark and > postfix. My current postfix configuration can deliver ~3000 > msg/sec to 1000 virtual mailboxes; however, the system (16 > core/4x4 AMD opteron) is ~90% idle. All logs and queues reside Why do you belie

Re: Create additional sub-folders postfix/courier

post...@corwyn.net a écrit : > And a last betterer/simpler way to do it. > > SELECT > if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildir,'+')-1),'/Maildir/.',right(maildir,length(maildir)-instr(maildir,'+'))),CONCAT(maildir,'Maildir/')) > from mailbox where username ='%s' and active='1' > >

Re: postfix benchmark performance

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:28:40PM -0500, Silas Boyd-Wickizer wrote: > > With 16 logical CPUs, in this configuration you'll find your CPU load > > to be 1/16th of the theoretical maximum + overhead. Your report of 10% > > is about right. > > The system has 16 physical execution units: four quad c

Re: Create additional sub-folders postfix/courier

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:24:25PM +0100, mouss wrote: > post...@corwyn.net a ?crit : > > And a last betterer/simpler way to do it. > > > > SELECT > > if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildir,'+')-1),'/Maildir/.',right(maildir,length(maildir)-instr(maildir,'+'))),CONCAT(maildir,'M

Re: Create additional sub-folders postfix/courier

Victor Duchovni a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:24:25PM +0100, mouss wrote: > >> post...@corwyn.net a ?crit : >>> And a last betterer/simpler way to do it. >>> >>> SELECT >>> if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildir,'+')-1),'/Maildir/.',right(maildir,length(maildir)-instr(ma

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote: Postfix delivered it to procmail, so postfix is done with it. I saw that, but there's nothing in ~/procmail/log since 2007. Time to look further. Thanks, Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility Applied

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

Rich Shepard wrote: On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote: Postfix delivered it to procmail, so postfix is done with it. I saw that, but there's nothing in ~/procmail/log since 2007. Time to look further. Yep. That's definitely a good place to start. At a minimum the procmail log s

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, J.P. Trosclair wrote: Might be worth turning on logging procmail. I don't see any problem from postfix, looks like the mail was delivered and whatever procmail did with it will probably revealed via procmail's log for future messsages. Done. As I wrote earlier, procma

Re: postfix benchmark performance

> Why do you believe that this should use 100% of ALL Cpus? > > If you look at your synthetic test then you will likely find that > there are at any point in time only a few mail receiving processes > and mail delivering processes, and that these processes will all > be waiting for kernel system c

Re: postfix benchmark performance

Silas Boyd-Wickizer wrote: Yes, there are only a few mail delivering processes (virtual). Why is this a function of my load? There are many messages waiting for delivery, so why doesn't postfix run more virtuals to increase concurrency? This might have something to do with concurrency... p

Re: postfix benchmark performance

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:47:40PM -0500, Silas Boyd-Wickizer wrote: > There are many messages > waiting for delivery, so why doesn't postfix run more virtuals > to increase concurrency? Because it can't decide where to send the mail any faster. This thread is not very productive, the benchmark

Re: postfix benchmark performance

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:45PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote: > Silas Boyd-Wickizer wrote: >> Yes, there are only a few mail delivering processes (virtual). Why is >> this a function of my load? There are many messages waiting for delivery, >> so why doesn't postfix run more virtuals to increase

Mail looping with transport maps and virtual alias maps

I have a few requirements which seem to be opposed to each other, as what I'm currently doing is causing a mail loop and bounce. Here's what I'm trying to accomplish: 1) This server is a standalone server sending outgoing mail, it is not receiving anything other than locally posted messages 2) Mes

Virtual domains, aliases and deliver (Dovecot)

I'm still trying to get my head wrapped around all the options and how they interact with each other and non-Postfix stuff. I have questions in regards to a mail server that will be a virtual mailbox server. I have set virtual_mailbox_domains and virtual_mailbox_maps (I think I got this one righ

Re: Create additional sub-folders postfix/courier

At 03:46 PM 2/11/2009, mouss wrote: Victor Duchovni a écrit : >>> SELECT >>> if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildir,'+')-1),'/Maildir/.',right(maildir,length(maildir)-instr(maildir,'+'))),CONCAT(maildir,'Maildir/')) >>> from mailbox where username ='%s' and active='1' >> you a

Re: postfix logs, spams and bounce messages

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote: You are doing Sender Address Verification (reject_unverified_sender) before doing RBL checks. Fix this. Do the RBL checks first, and consider not doing SAV at all, but if you do use it, do SAV *last*. smtpd_data_restrictions =

create allusers alias dynamically from LDAP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I'm running Postfix with OpenLDAP as user backend for quite a long time now. All is working like a charm, but atm I'm struggling with the following problem : I want to create an alias which contains all LDAP accounts of a specific ob

Re: postfix benchmark performance

Silas Boyd-Wickizer: > > Why do you believe that this should use 100% of ALL Cpus? > > > > If you look at your synthetic test then you will likely find that > > there are at any point in time only a few mail receiving processes > > and mail delivering processes, and that these processes will all >

Permit TLS connections from LAN but not from Internet

Dear all, I have Postfix + TLS and have this two lines in my main.cf : #For daemon component smtpd_tls_security_level = may #For client component smtp_tls_security_level = may This imply that depending on the mail client settings, it can use or not TLS (may). But I'm confused

Re: Permit TLS connections from LAN but not from Internet

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:07:18PM -0200, Alejandro Cabrera wrote: > Dear all, I have Postfix + TLS and have this two lines in my main.cf > : > > #For daemon component > smtpd_tls_security_level = may Mail your receive from others. > #For client component > smtp_tls_security_lev

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, J.P. Trosclair wrote: > >> Might be worth turning on logging procmail. I don't see any problem from >> postfix, looks like the mail was delivered and whatever procmail did with >> it will probably revealed via procmail's log for futur

Re: Virtual domains, aliases and deliver (Dovecot)

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > I'm still trying to get my head wrapped around all the options and how > they interact with each other and non-Postfix stuff. > > I have questions in regards to a mail server that will be a virtual > mailbox server. > > I have set virtual_mailbox_

Re: Mail Received But Not Delivered

On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Sahil Tandon wrote: Figure out why Postfix is passing the message on to procmail. Is it a .forward file? A transport setting in main.cf? Sahil, No, because the delivery address is local. I've turned on (and up) procmail logging. Perhaps that will help. Why, afte

How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

Hi, I'm looking for a safe way to re-inject an archived queue file that was backed up and removed (via postsuper) from the hold queue. (Not just this once, but on a regular basis.) I realize that it would be possible to use postcat to grab the raw contents of the archived message and feed it bac

Re: Virtual domains, aliases and deliver (Dovecot)

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:11:00PM -0800, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > The documentation indicates a virtual_alias_maps with a line like: > > ab...@mydomain.tldab...@anotherdomain.tld > > should work. But I'm getting this in /var/log/maillog: > The documentation is correct. > Feb 11 13:57:

Re: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

Hi, I usually put it into the hold queue and then run postsuper -H to release it from the hold queue. /Victor Curtis wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a safe way to re-inject an archived queue file that > was backed up and removed (via postsuper) from the hold queue. (Not > just this once, but

Re: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

Curtis: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a safe way to re-inject an archived queue file that > was backed up and removed (via postsuper) from the hold queue. (Not > just this once, but on a regular basis.) I realize that it would be > possible to use postcat to grab the raw contents of the archived > m

Re: How to safely re-inject an archived queue file?

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:46:54AM +0100, Victor Jerlin wrote: > Hi, > > I usually put it into the hold queue and then run postsuper -H > to release it from the hold queue. > This is not enough for queue files copied from another location, you have to adjust the queue file name to give it a su

recipient_delimiter and virtual users

OK, so I've become intrigued with recipient delimiters. My users are currently stored in a mysql database, 'postfix'. The table format is as postfixadmin sets it up, so in the username is the user email address u...@example.com Before I started tinkering, email to u...@example.com worked.

Re: create allusers alias dynamically from LDAP

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 12.02.2009 um 00:58 schrieb Christoph Erdle: I want to create an alias which contains all LDAP accounts of a specific object class (VirtualMailAccount) to create a mailinglist containing all mail accounts on the server. Maybe I'm thinking to