Hello,
I get the below in my logs. Why do I get this error? smtpd.key exists
Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: cannot get private
key from file /etc/ssl/private/smtpd.key
Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: TLS library
problem: 10310:error:0B080074:x509 cert
I use an after queue filter to filter incoming email. When the filter
queue grows because email comes in faster than it can handle the filter
returns a 450 until the filter queue is empty again. Now when email is
received in a big burst it can happen that the filter queue temporarily
grows and then
Martijn Brinkers:
> I use an after queue filter to filter incoming email. When the filter
> queue grows because email comes in faster than it can handle the filter
> returns a 450 until the filter queue is empty again. Now when email is
> received in a big burst it can happen that the filter queue
Tolga:
> Hello,
>
> I get the below in my logs. Why do I get this error? smtpd.key exists
>
> Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: cannot get private
> key from file /etc/ssl/private/smtpd.key
> Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: TLS library
> problem: 10310:er
Wietse Venema yazmış:
Tolga:
Hello,
I get the below in my logs. Why do I get this error? smtpd.key exists
Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: cannot get private
key from file /etc/ssl/private/smtpd.key
Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: TLS library
pro
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Tolga wrote:
> Wietse Venema yazm:
>> Tolga:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I get the below in my logs. Why do I get this error? smtpd.key exists
>>>
>>> Jan 30 09:58:58 ozses postfix/smtpd[10310]: warning: cannot get
>>> private key from file /etc/ssl/private/smtpd.key
>>> Jan
>> I've read and applied
>> https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html. How could this
>> happen? Shouldn't the information be consistent?
>
> Postfix is not affiliated with Ubuntu, so whatever you read on the
> above-linked web site is the responsibility of the Ubuntu person who autho
Tolga:
> I've read and applied
> https://help.ubuntu.com/8.04/serverguide/C/postfix.html. How could this
> happen? Shouldn't the information be consistent?
That document is not part of Postfix, so you better complain
to the Ubuntu people, not here.
Wietse
Hi,
I've got two gateway machines that process aliases. If there is an
alias that maps to a remote address (eg. hotmail) the mail is relayed
directly to the remote domain, or if the alias maps to a local domain
the message is relayed to the back end servers. If there is no alias
the message is als
how to use this command?
and that must contain the file jed /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method: pwcheck saslauthd
or else
I have one and that the plain authentication on my server
Le mercredi 28 janvier 2009 à 20:06 +0100, Patrick Ben Koetter a écrit :
> John,
>
> * swilting :
> >
Guy wrote:
Hi,
I've got two gateway machines that process aliases. If there is an
alias that maps to a remote address (eg. hotmail) the mail is relayed
directly to the remote domain, or if the alias maps to a local domain
the message is relayed to the back end servers. If there is no alias
the m
Wietse Venema wrote:
Martijn Brinkers:
I use an after queue filter to filter incoming email. When the filter
queue grows because email comes in faster than it can handle the filter
returns a 450 until the filter queue is empty again. Now when email is
received in a big burst it can happen that t
Gabriel Hahmann wrote:
Ok J.P
In fact the log entries looks like normal, like normal message sent. When I
sent a mail to the global alias (which is my alias to all users), in the
mail.log appear a message from me to the global alias and then a message
from me to each user listed in the alias. Th
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:43:07AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> If that's ineffective for some reason, then implement the suggestions
> outlined in
> http://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html#backlog
Note, for Postfix 2.5.x with x<=6, there is an error in the parameter
names actually used by qmgr(
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:45:15AM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
>> global: ... giant list of users ...
>> ..
Create a "global-owner: postmaster" alias (replace postmaster with list
maintainer address), and consider moving the list to a :include:/path
external file. Without or or the other, you wi
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:55:53PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:45:15AM -0600, J.P. Trosclair wrote:
>
> >> global: ... giant list of users ...
> >> ..
>
> Create a "global-owner: postmaster" alias (replace postmaster with list
> maintainer address), and consider mo
Marcial Rion:
> > Yes. I need to correlate what local(8) forwards against what cleanup(8)
> > receives.
> >
> > Wietse
> >
> Here you go with the correlated logs (local -v and cleanup -v):
>
> http://www.copypaste.at/276
What you have can happen only with modified Postfix code.
Wi
Wietse Venema wrote:
Marcial Rion:
Yes. I need to correlate what local(8) forwards against what cleanup(8)
receives.
Wietse
Here you go with the correlated logs (local -v and cleanup -v):
http://www.copypaste.at/276
What you have can happen only with modified Postf
Hi:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 04:46:01PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote:
>
>> Ok, something else. Maybe isn't too appropiate for this post to use
>> jvoorhe...@gmail.com as result_format because has no relation with my
>> virtual domains scenar
On 1/30/2009, Marcial Rion (marcial.r...@swissonline.ch) wrote:
> Ok, your explanation - and as far as I can understand the code -
> makes sense to me, though I cannot explain why my box is using
> modified code (I initially emerged postfix on my Gentoo box [is
> Gentoo known to change postfix code
Hello.
I have a Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL+ClamAV mail gateway system.
I'm observing time spent by a messagge in (Amavisd-new) content_filter
of postfix (I trascure deliberately the time spent by a message to be
processed by postfix, because it is neglegible with respect to the
filter).
I "grep"
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:43 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> Seems to me the first action should be to reduce the number of
> smtp connections to the content_filter to a number it's able
> to consistently handle.
There is a big difference in filtering speed between messages. The
filter is an encryptio
Marcial Rion:
> Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Marcial Rion:
> >
> >>> Yes. I need to correlate what local(8) forwards against what cleanup(8)
> >>> receives.
> >>>
> >>> Wietse
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Here you go with the correlated logs (local -v and cleanup -v):
> >>
> >> http://www.copypaste.
I have look at the page
http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
nobody is perfect. I can not
Le vendredi 30 janvier 2009 à 18:18 +0100, swilting a écrit :
> how to use this command?
>
> and that must contain the file jed /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf
>
> pwcheck_method: pwcheck saslauthd
>
>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken the described approach (with
> fragile_destination_concurrency*) works when you have small bursts of
> errors. In my case it can take some time before connections are allowed
> (email is again allowed when the
Martijn Brinkers wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:43 -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
Seems to me the first action should be to reduce the number of
smtp connections to the content_filter to a number it's able
to consistently handle.
There is a big difference in filtering speed between messages. The
f
Steve a écrit :
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:26 +0100
>> Von: "Steve"
>> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: Calling smtpd restriction/filter from within master.cf
>
>> Original-Nachricht
>>> Datum: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:44:53 +
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
If I'm not mistaken the described approach (with
fragile_destination_concurrency*) works when you have small bursts of
errors. In my case it can take some time before connections are allowed
(email is again
David Schraeder a écrit :
>
>
> Magnus Bäck wrote:
>> On Thursday, January 29, 2009 at 23:39 CET,
>> David Schraeder wrote:
>>
>>> I just got this postfix server going a few days ago. I have one
>>> person receiving some emails that are not address to him. Yes they
>>> are spam and I am r
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:45:29PM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
>>> If I'm not mistaken the described approach (with
>>> fragile_destination_concurrency*) works when you have small bursts of
>>> errors. In my
hi *
the above version compile flawlessly and is running fine on my main
mailserver. on my home-server, i get the following error:
gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -DUSE_TLS -DHAS_PCRE -DSNAPSHOT -g -O -I.
-I../../include -DLINUX2 -o
smtpd smtpd.o smtpd_token.o smtpd_check.o smtpd_chat.o sm
Sahil Tandon a écrit :
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Jim Wright wrote:
>
>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 4:54 PM, Magnus Bäck wrote:
>>
>>> You can easily find the relevant log entries by grepping your maillog
>>> for the queue id, which is found in the first Received: header added by
>>> your system. In this
> iminate all queues from the filter, it should be a proxy. Let Postfix
> do all the queueing, it is much better at this than the filter.
The filter is based on James which is a Java based email server and
cannot be used as a proxy, at least not without a major overhaul. The
biggest reason I added
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:00:26PM +0100, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
> > iminate all queues from the filter, it should be a proxy. Let Postfix
> > do all the queueing, it is much better at this than the filter.
>
> The filter is based on James which is a Java based email server and
> cannot be used
Hi -
I've got a strange postfix problem under opensuse 11.
I have a couple admin type aliases setup on this box. Users can email these
addresses and the messages get routed to the right person. Everything works
fine. However, whenever one user replies to one of the messages from one of the
loca
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:51:19PM +0100, Peter Adebahr wrote:
> gcc -Wmissing-prototypes -Wformat -DUSE_TLS -DHAS_PCRE -DSNAPSHOT -g -O -I.
> -I../../include -DLINUX2 -o
> smtpd smtpd.o smtpd_token.o smtpd_check.o smtpd_chat.o smtpd_state.o
> smtpd_peer.o smtpd_sasl_proto.o smtpd_sasl_glue.o s
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:07:55PM -0600, Vruwink, Timothy Roger wrote:
> VGVzdC4NCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCk Zyb206IE1lZGlhIC0gV2ViIFN1
> cHBvcnQgW21haWx0bzptZWRpYUBoZWxwLndpbGwudWl1Yy5lZH VdIA0KU2VudDogVGh1cnNkYXks
> IEphbnVhcnkgMjksIDIwMDkgNDoxOCBQTQ0KVG86IEJhcnJpbm VhdSwgTWFyeSB
> > If the filter queue size is larger than 500 messages (lower level) wait
> > some time X in the RCPT handler of the filter and then continue
> > normally. If size is larger than 1000 (upper level) return 450.
>
> Seems to me something is broken if the filter processing speed
> is affected by
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:14:32PM +0100, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
> > > If the filter queue size is larger than 500 messages (lower level) wait
> > > some time X in the RCPT handler of the filter and then continue
> > > normally. If size is larger than 1000 (upper level) return 450.
> >
> > Seem
> You are solving the wrong problem. Your filter absorbs mail too fast,
> queues it and then pushes back. It is far better for the filter to take
> its time before responding to "." and thus to tie up Postfix connections
> while the filter is catching up.
You are completely right, that's what happ
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:20:02PM +0100, Martijn Brinkers wrote:
> > You are solving the wrong problem. Your filter absorbs mail too fast,
> > queues it and then pushes back. It is far better for the filter to take
> > its time before responding to "." and thus to tie up Postfix connections
> > w
Here are the headers of the original outgoing email. When the user replies to
this message her incoming emails gets scrambled. Only seems to happen for her
though.
Received: from
(1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.336.0; Thu, 29 Jan
2009 09:54:05 -0600
Received: from
Martijn Brinkers wrote:
If the filter queue size is larger than 500 messages (lower level) wait
some time X in the RCPT handler of the filter and then continue
normally. If size is larger than 1000 (upper level) return 450.
Seems to me something is broken if the filter processing speed
is affec
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:37:25PM -0600, Vruwink, Timothy Roger wrote:
> Here are the headers of the original outgoing email. When the user replies
> to this message her incoming emails gets scrambled. Only seems to happen for
> her though.
>
> Received: from
> (1) with Microsoft SM
Hi there:
I finally understood and fixed previous problems with my Postfix
installation. Now I'm invoking gnarwl from a transport, something like
this:
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
virtual_alias_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/phamm_alias.cf,
ldap:/etc/postfix/phamm_vacation.cf
/etc/pos
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:28:49PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> # ps aux | grep gnarwl
> postfix 30245 0.0 0.3 6836 1804 ?S16:23 0:00 pipe
> -n gnarwl -t unix flags=F user=gnarwl argv=/usr/local/bin/gnarwl -c
> /usr/local/etc/gnarwl.cfg -s ${sender} -a ${us...@{nexthop}
> roo
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 2:42 PM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Garbled emails
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:37:25PM -0600, Vruwink
> I have a Postfix+Amavisd-new+MySQL+ClamAV mail gateway system.
>
> I'm observing time spent by a messagge in (Amavisd-new) content_filter
> of postfix (I trascure deliberately the time spent by a message to be
> processed by postfix, because it is neglegible with respect to the
> filter).
>
> I "
Jason Voorhees:
> But I can see that gnarwl isn't receiving the email from Postfix, then
> I query my processes:
>
> # ps aux | grep gnarwl
> postfix 30245 0.0 0.3 6836 1804 ?S16:23 0:00 pipe
> -n gnarwl -t unix flags=F user=gnarwl argv=/usr/local/bin/gnarwl -c
> /usr/local/etc
Rocco Scappatura:
> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the cntent
> filer and to postfix without conten filter):
>
> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23:
> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9,
> delays=1.3/0/0/7.7, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
Thanks Wietse,
>> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the
>> cntent
>> filer and to postfix without conten filter):
>>
>> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23:
>> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9,
>> delays=1.3/0/0/7.7, dsn=2.0.0, statu
Rocco Scappatura:
> Thanks Wietse,
>
> >> For example consider the log relative to the relay entries (to the
> >> cntent
> >> filer and to postfix without conten filter):
> >>
> >> 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23:
> >> to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9,
> >>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 07:35:53PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > 1) Jan 30 10:02:17 av5 postfix/smtp[10603]: C0AFB226F23:
> > to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026, delay=8.9,
> > delays=1.3/0/0/7.7, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
> > 95CEE226F30)
>
> Postfix measures 7.7 secon
Hello,
I'd like to know if I can provide the following solution using postfix:
1) Accept mail for example.com as primary MX (yes, possible)
2) Relay to mx2.example.com (yes, possible)
3) If mx2.example.com gives fatal error, reduce to transient and try again
later (not sure if relay -o soft_boun
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:42:22PM -0900, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> 1) Accept mail for example.com as primary MX (yes, possible)
> 2) Relay to mx2.example.com (yes, possible)
> 3) If mx2.example.com gives fatal error, reduce to transient and try again
> later (not sure if relay -o soft_bounce=yes w
55 matches
Mail list logo
