Noel Jones wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
Hi guys, I believe that I already have the answer to this pretty
basic setup, but I just wanted to do a quick sanity check.
I'm setting up a backup MX, and for one of the domains that it will
relay to, it should do no filtering whatsoever as there is a Symant
DJ Lucas a écrit :
> mouss wrote:
>> the question is: does the symantec device reject spam or does it "tag
>> and deliver" or "quarantine". it should not reject mail since you have
>> accepted it.
> Honestly, I'm not even sure what device he has, in fact, I'm not
> familiar with any Symantec hardwa
Darren Pilgrim a écrit :
> King Spook wrote:
>> I'm getting hit pretty hard with spam, and was hoping to reduce it a
>> bit by adding the following smtpd restrictions:
>>
>> smtpd_helo_restrictions = reject_invalid_helo_hostname,
>> reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
>> smtpd_sender_restrictions = rejec
Asif Iqbal wrote:
> You are right I cannot talk to any domain's MX. My ISP is cox and I cannot
> even talk to their two MXs on port 25. I guess I could do a nmap to find
> what port they are using for MX. They might require some authentication.
> I have no idea what my login is to my cox account.
DJ Lucas wrote:
In light of that note, I'll be gracious with the comments, and since it
is the expected configuration, I'll go ahead and add the
relay_recipient_maps (though IIUC, it'll never be used). I'm not really
concerned for myself. I will have it documented locally. But, should I
get
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
>> You are right I cannot talk to any domain's MX. My ISP is cox and I cannot
>> even talk to their two MXs on port 25. I guess I could do a nmap to find
>> what port they are using for MX. They might require some authentic
Asif Iqbal:
> I could skip the signing part and just a .pem file. But seems like I
> will also need a Thawte certificate.
You need no certificate to SEND mail.
Wietse
On Dec 19, 2008, at 10:59 AM, "Asif Iqbal" wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Sahil Tandon
wrote:
Asif Iqbal wrote:
You are right I cannot talk to any domain's MX. My ISP is cox and
I cannot
even talk to their two MXs on port 25. I guess I could do a nmap
to find
what port they are
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Asif Iqbal:
>> I could skip the signing part and just a .pem file. But seems like I
>> will also need a Thawte certificate.
>
> You need no certificate to SEND mail.
I am trying to use gmail as my relayhost. I cannot just send mail to
gmai
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2008, at 10:59 AM, "Asif Iqbal" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>>>
>>> Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>>
You are right I cannot talk to any domain's MX. My ISP is cox and I
cannot
even talk to
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Asif Iqbal:
> >> I could skip the signing part and just a .pem file. But seems like I
> >> will also need a Thawte certificate.
> >
> > You need no certificate to SEND mail.
>
Asif Iqbal:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Asif Iqbal:
> >> I could skip the signing part and just a .pem file. But seems like I
> >> will also need a Thawte certificate.
> >
> > You need no certificate to SEND mail.
>
> I am trying to use gmail as my relayhost. I c
Is there any way to have special routing for mail that's created on the
postfix server(localhost), destined for mydomain?
The transport map allows for routing based on destination, but I don't
see any way to route based on source. Currently inbound mail goes from
the internet to postfix to a c
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > Asif Iqbal:
>> >> I could skip the signing part and just a .pem file. But seems like I
>> >> will also need a Thaw
Terry Carmen:
> Is there any way to have special routing for mail that's created on the
> postfix server(localhost), destined for mydomain?
As far as I recall, internally generated messages are not subject
to the content_filter setting. Thus, you can use the content_filter
parameter to send "regu
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:54:05PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Is there any way to have special routing for mail that's created on the
> > postfix server(localhost), destined for mydomain?
>
> As far as I recall, internally generated messages are not subject
> to the content_filter setting.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:52:11PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
> Useless advise really.
The pointer to SOHO_README.html was provided upstream. This contains
references to all the information you need to configure a home MTA if
that is indeed the right answer to your question.
I'd also look for a
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:54:05PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there any way to have special routing for mail that's created on the
postfix server(localhost), destined for mydomain?
As far as I recall, internally generated messages are not subject
to the con
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Terry Carmen wrote:
> content_filter=amavisfeed:[127.0.0.1]:10024
> to
> content_filter=cidr:/special_routing.cidr
No. You set it empty.
content_filter =
> then,
>
> special_routing.cidr:
> 127.0.0.1/32 smtp:exchange server ip
> 0.0.0.0/0 amavi
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:52:11PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
>>
>> Useless advise really.
>
> The pointer to SOHO_README.html was provided upstream. This contains
> references to all the information you need to configure a home MTA if
> th
Good day,
I'm having some strange problems with Postfix.
It works perfectly, I have no problems sending or receiving e-mail but
sometimes the user can't receive any e-mail using his client (such as
Outlook Express) or through webmail. When we check the mail file, the first
line is full of @ signs
Pedro Augusto wrote:
> Good day,
>
> I'm having some strange problems with Postfix.
>
> It works perfectly, I have no problems sending or receiving e-mail but
> sometimes the user can't receive any e-mail using his client (such as
> Outlook Express) or through webmail. When we check the mail file,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 02:47:49PM -0500, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> Pedro Augusto wrote:
> > Good day,
> >
> > I'm having some strange problems with Postfix.
> >
> > It works perfectly, I have no problems sending or receiving e-mail but
> > sometimes the user can't receive any e-mail usi
Asif Iqbal wrote:
>> No need to jump through such hoops. You do not need certs or .pem files to
>> relay through gmail. Search the archives of this mailing list for examples,
>
> No cert needed to relay through gmail? Let me dig in the mailing list.
> I guess that is what
> Wietse Venema meant in
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Asif Iqbal:
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> > Asif Iqbal:
>> >> I could skip the signing part and just a .pem file. But seems like I
>> >> will also need a Thawte certificate.
>> >
>> > You need no certificate to
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:32:55PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
> How do I test the SSL ?
>
> I go this with openssl
>
> iqb...@ghar:~$ openssl s_client -connect smtp.gmail.com:587
You forgot "-starttls smtp". But gmail's SSL works, you don't really
need to test it. Just set:
smtp_tls_secu
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:32:55PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>
>> How do I test the SSL ?
>>
>> I go this with openssl
>>
>> iqb...@ghar:~$ openssl s_client -connect smtp.gmail.com:587
>
> You forgot "-starttls smtp". But gmail's SSL works,
Asif Iqbal:
> > need to test it. Just set:
> >
> >smtp_tls_security_level = encrypt
>
> Thanks, I will put that in
Just checked here that Postfix can talk SSL with [smtp.gmail.com]:587
just fine. But you need to set up client-side SASL authentication.
Wietse
Asif Iqbal wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:32:55PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
How do I test the SSL ?
I go this with openssl
iqb...@ghar:~$ openssl s_client -connect smtp.gmail.com:587
You forgot "-starttls smtp". But gmail's SSL work
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:32:55PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>>
How do I test the SSL ?
I go this with openssl
iqb...@ghar:~$ op
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Victor Duchovni
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:32:55PM -0500, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>>
How do I test the SSL ?
I go this with openssl
iqb...@ghar:~$ op
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/18/2008 06:28 AM:
>
>> I think you should send more info on your config, for example:
>>
>> MX record for your domain.
>> myhostname entry from main.cf
>>
>> these two should match.
>
> There is no requ
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/19/2008 08:47 PM:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
>> Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/18/2008 06:28 AM:
>>
>>> I think you should send more info on your config, for example:
>>>
>>> MX record for your domain.
>>> myhostname
Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
> > Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote, at 12/18/2008 06:28 AM:
> >
> >> I think you should send more info on your config, for example:
> >>
> >> MX record for your domain.
> >> myhostname entry from main.c
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:01 AM, vivek.agrawal
wrote:
>
> relayhost=smtp.gmail.com
This is wrong. smtp.gmail.com no have MX entry. To point to A entry,
you need [].
relayhost=[smtp.gmail.com]
And this continue wrong, because you dont need explicit transport
declaration to send mail to gmail or
35 matches
Mail list logo
