On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 03:06:20PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Jakub Nadolny a écrit :
> >
> > Yes, it uses sendmail command. It is common vacation.pl by Mischa Peters,
> > but
> > quite old version, I can not find newer one. What would be the best
> > solution for
> > postfix auto-responder which cou
Hello,
I have a Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new platform.
Time ago I get some hint for avoiding spam scan for a particular sender
an a particular client.
In particular, in /etc/postfix/main.cf I put:
smtpd_restriction_classes = from_policy_bank_senders
from_policy_bank_senders =
check_sender_acce
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I have a Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new platform.
Time ago I get some hint for avoiding spam scan for a particular sender
an a particular client.
In particular, in /etc/postfix/main.cf I put:
smtpd_restriction_classes = from_policy_bank_sender
On 12/11/08 11:03 PM, Victor Duchovni at victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:53:18PM -0600, Larry Stone wrote:
>
>>> This is not a bug, but it is admittedly an unecessary deviation from
>>> SHOULD normative language in the RFC when the client is in flagrant
>>> v
Hi all,
I have problem with spam that pretending me ( using my account email ) to
send spam (Viagra etc ) to my self,
I have tested to http://verify.abuse.net/cgi-bin/relaytest ,
http://www.spamhelp.org/shopenrelay/shopenrelaytest.php
and
http://www.antispam-ufrj.pads.ufrj.br/cgi-bin/test-relay
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:59:41AM +0100, klondike wrote:
>
> > According to section 4.2.4 on the RFC 282, the SMTP server should return
> > 502 only when a command is recognised but not implemented, and 500 if it
> > isn't recognised.
>
> This is not a bug, but it is admittedl
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 06:33:51AM -0600, Larry Stone wrote:
> On 12/11/08 11:03 PM, Victor Duchovni at victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
> > You *should* next read:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
>
> Thanks. [ ... ]
You're welcome. I think we can close this thread now.
--
Hi:
I have been unable to find a solution for this (please forgive me if it's
simple and I've
missed it).
I am trying to set up mailman as a relay from postfix (the domains assigned to
mailman
lists are to become relay domains). I know I can set it up as local: with the
pipes in the
aliases fi
jweinbergerhj wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I have been unable to find a solution for this (please forgive me if it's
> simple and I've
> missed it).
>
> I am trying to set up mailman as a relay from postfix (the domains assigned
> to mailman
> lists are to become relay domains). I know I can set it up as l
Hi,
I am looking for limiting posts to internal email distribution lists to
its members. I have already looked at the example in
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html. But what I am
looking for is permitting mails only from those email ids which are
members of that particular ma
Hello,
I have a Postfix MTA which is configured to check recipients for a
domain listed in table "relay_domains", before to forward the message to
the appropriate post office.
All has worked fine, until the MTA has been configured as backup MX for
an external domain, say "extdomain.tld".
Since t
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
>
> jweinbergerhj wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I have been unable to find a solution for this (please forgive me if it's
> > simple and I've
> > missed it).
> >
> > I am trying to set up mailman as a relay from postfix (the domains assig
jweinbergerhj wrote:
>>
>> mysql is a map type not a transport.
>> It cannot be set in relay_transport.
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#relay_transport
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>
> Brian, thanks!
>
> This does seem so obvious...but there are a few docs out there that show
> transport maps
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I have a Postfix MTA which is configured to check recipients for a
domain listed in table "relay_domains", before to forward the message to
the appropriate post office.
All has worked fine, until the MTA has been configured as backup MX for
an external domain, say
> > Dec 12 16:55:33 av1 postfix/smtpd[25586]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> > unknown[]: 550 5.1.1
> > : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
> relay
> > recipient table; from= to=< u...@extdomain.tld>
> > proto=ESMTP helo=
>
> The error message indicates you have defined
> relay_recipient_m
I'm attempting to rewrite all source addresses from our server farm via
a canonical map.
What I want to see happen is that if the sender is, for instance
apa...@machinename.datacenter.example.com
I want it to rewrite it to:
mxm...@example.com
so that bounces can be routed accordingly via a cus
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:07:15AM -0800, Corey Chandler wrote:
> I'm attempting to rewrite all source addresses from our server farm via
> a canonical map.
Use smtp_generic_maps for this. Not canonical_maps. Upgrade to a Postfix
that supports this feature if necessary.
http://www.postfix.o
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Moreover, Postfix was written before RFC2821. Declaring error
> replies buggy after the rules change is not useful.
>
But if the rules do change, would you not alter Postfix accordingly? (I
don't mean this instance specifically as this appe
Somewhat unrelated, but perhaps worth mentioning:
For couple of years I've used RegexBuddy (http://www.regexbuddy.com) to
facilitate / speed up creation of regular expressions for various uses (it
supports many regexp flavors). The program makes writing of regexps fun, and
is a great help especial
Ville Walveranta wrote:
> Somewhat unrelated, but perhaps worth mentioning:
>
> For couple of years I've used RegexBuddy (http://www.regexbuddy.com)
Weird, no linux version? oh well, useless to me.
Joe
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 13:16 -0700, J Sloan wrote:
> Ville Walveranta wrote:
> > Somewhat unrelated, but perhaps worth mentioning:
> >
> > For couple of years I've used RegexBuddy (http://www.regexbuddy.com)
>
> Weird, no linux version? oh well, useless to me.
I know, way OT, but has to be said:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:07:15AM -0800, Corey Chandler wrote:
I'm attempting to rewrite all source addresses from our server farm via
a canonical map.
Use smtp_generic_maps for this. Not canonical_maps. Upgrade to a Postfix
that supports this feature if necess
Sturgis, Grant wrote:
> I know, way OT, but has to be said:
>
> You think a linux bigot would use such a thing?
>
No need for name calling on this list. That sort of nonsense, if you've
simply got to say it, should have been said via pm.
Joe
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:26:29PM -0800, Corey Chandler wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:07:15AM -0800, Corey Chandler wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm attempting to rewrite all source addresses from our server farm via
> >>a canonical map.
> >>
> >
> >Use smtp_generic_m
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:16 PM, J Sloan wrote:
> Weird, no linux version? oh well, useless to me.
>
Well, there's always Wine...
Ville
Marky Yehezkiel (SNC) a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I have problem with spam that pretending me ( using my account email )
> to send spam (Viagra etc ) to my self,
>
> I have tested to http://verify.abuse.net/cgi-bin/relaytest ,
> http://www.spamhelp.org/shopenrelay/shopenrelaytest.php
>
> and
> http:
Rahul Amaram a écrit :
> Hi,
> I am looking for limiting posts to internal email distribution lists to
> its members. I have already looked at the example in
> http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html. But what I am
> looking for is permitting mails only from those email ids which are
>
> that check only blocks specific spam: spam that uses an address in your
> domain in the envelope sender (MAIL FROM command). this envelope sender
> is what you see in the Return-Path header in the sample you posted.
>
I tried adding the REJECT line to the "check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfi
Rocco Scappatura a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have a Postfix+MySQL+Amavisd-new platform.
>
> Time ago I get some hint for avoiding spam scan for a particular sender
> an a particular client.
>
> In particular, in /etc/postfix/main.cf I put:
>
> smtpd_restriction_classes = from_policy_bank_senders
>
Rocco Scappatura a écrit :
>>> Dec 12 16:55:33 av1 postfix/smtpd[25586]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
>>> unknown[]: 550 5.1.1
>>> : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in
>> relay
>>> recipient table; from= to=< u...@extdomain.tld>
>>> proto=ESMTP helo=
>> The error message indicates you have d
Roland Plüss schrieb:
I'll try mapping zen.spamhaus.org to 127.0.0.2 in my /etc/hosts. This
should not require a DNS lookup and hopefully it works then. Let's see
You must not do this if you want to use zen.spamhaus.org. Please follow
the given advices and read something about how dnsbls wo
Ville Walveranta:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Moreover, Postfix was written before RFC2821. Declaring error
> > replies buggy after the rules change is not useful.
> >
>
> But if the rules do change, would you not alter Postfix accordingly? (I
> don't mean this
Hi mouss,
thank you for advise.
but i will not use :
reject_invalid_helo_hostname
reject_non_fqdn_helo_hostname
because a lot of our
clients customer or their friend was rejected because of their mail server
not passed invalid helo hostname and non fqdn.
> Marky
Yehezkiel (SNC) a écr
33 matches
Mail list logo
