Re: check_sender_access

2008-11-28 Thread mouss
Christophe Dumonet a écrit : > Hello, > In order to deny the use of certain lists from outside, I use : > > smtpd_restriction_classes = insiders_only > insiders_only = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/insiders, reject > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = check_recipient_access > hash:/etc/postfix

Re: Suspending outgoing smtp temporary

2008-11-28 Thread Rajkumar S
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Brian Evans - Postfix List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rajkumar S wrote: >> Hi, >> >> How can I suspend postfix delivering mails to external domains >> temporary? Postfix must accept mails to other destinations but not >> deliver them till it's told to. >> > See ht

Re: How to have postfix not generate a bounce message when an email is rejected for a specific reason.

2008-11-28 Thread LaGatorVII
Thank you for your response. However you didn't answer my question. Our server keeps mail for 14days because it is a gateway for our customer's exchange servers. We WANT it that way so in the event of a server outage our server can keep the mail queued for the exchange servers until they get back

disable_vrfy_command should be obsoleted?

2008-11-28 Thread Reinaldo de Carvalho
Hi, The smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords and smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps can replace disable_vrfy_command, then it can be removed? -- Reinaldo de Carvalho http://korreio.sf.net http://python-cyrus.sf.net

Re: How to have postfix not generate a bounce message when an email is rejected for a specific reason.

2008-11-28 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 06:43:44AM -0800, LaGatorVII wrote: > > Thank you for your response. However you didn't answer my question. Our > server keeps mail for 14days because it is a gateway for our customer's > exchange servers. We WANT it that way so in the event of a server outage our > server

Re: disable_vrfy_command should be obsoleted?

2008-11-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Reinaldo de Carvalho: > Hi, > > The smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords and > smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps can replace > disable_vrfy_command, then it can be removed? Clients can send VRFY without ever sending EHLO. Wietse

Re: check_sender_access

2008-11-28 Thread Christophe Dumonet
You're right, CC or CCI (Bcc) are converted by the MUA into SMTP recipients. Well ... I have solved my issue...I had done a really stupid confusion : I had used postfix with an old main.cf.BACKUP file without this configuration ! The real main.cf with good configuration works fine so. Sorry for

Re: preventing backscatter with virtual_alias_maps

2008-11-28 Thread D G Teed
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:39 AM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > if you have no domains in relay_domains, then you don't need > > relay_recipient_maps nor reject_unverified_domains. > > > > you are using a "non standa

status=deferred (temporary failure) issue

2008-11-28 Thread Colin Beckingham
Postfix 2.5.1 on OpenSuse 11 - I am trying to send mail to myself on a machine that is not connected to the internet. I have a user AAA on the machine, I try to send mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the postfix process seems to be fine but is always deferred with a temp

Re: status=deferred (temporary failure) issue

2008-11-28 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 01:58:45PM -0500, Colin Beckingham wrote: > Postfix 2.5.1 on OpenSuse 11 - > > I am trying to send mail to myself on a machine that is not connected to > the internet. I have a user AAA on the machine, I try to send mail > from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: status=deferred (temporary failure) issue

2008-11-28 Thread Colin Beckingham
Thanks for the response... On 28/11/08 02:22 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 01:58:45PM -0500, Colin Beckingham wrote: Postfix 2.5.1 on OpenSuse 11 - I am trying to send mail to myself on a machine that is not connected to the internet. I have a user AAA on the machine,

Re: status=deferred (temporary failure) issue

2008-11-28 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 03:22:17PM -0500, Colin Beckingham wrote: > >>mail_spool_directory = /var/spool/mail > >>mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail > > > >The second (delivery to procmail) overrides the first (delivery to > >mbox files in /var/spool/mail). Procmail is likely not working > >correc

virtual mailbox and forward catch_all

2008-11-28 Thread amédée dugenou
Hi, I'm setting up a postfix serveur.canonical domain is $myhostname. I've set up a virtual domain (in the configuration below, it's example.com) with virtual mailboxes. What is working : - receive mail on unix account with [EMAIL PROTECTED] - receive mail for example.com and have them delivered

Re: virtual mailbox and forward catch_all

2008-11-28 Thread Wietse Venema
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?am=E9d=E9e_dugenou?=: > - have a catch-all for example.com forwarded to another domain. thus, > mails received for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is delivered to local virtual > mailbox if it is a known user, otherwise the mail is redirected to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the part before @ should be the

Re: virtual mailbox and forward catch_all

2008-11-28 Thread amédée dugenou
> Use one-to-one virtual alias mappings for the users that must not > be sent to the catch-all address. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > @example.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Recursive virtual alias expansion stops when the left-hand side > address

Re: virtual mailbox and forward catch_all

2008-11-28 Thread amédée dugenou
> also, is it possible to keep a local copy when forwarding ? > Oh, found myself : for records, in virtual alias map, simply do like this : [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Et Voilà !

Re: preventing backscatter with virtual_alias_maps

2008-11-28 Thread Ville Walveranta
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:47 AM, D G Teed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I can't understand the developer's notes, I usually emulate > something that works from useful examples. As a relatively recent newcomer to Postfix (I've been running qmail since 2002 and Postfix since last year) I agree

Re: virtual mailbox and forward catch_all

2008-11-28 Thread Wietse Venema
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?am=E9d=E9e_dugenou?=: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > > Use one-to-one virtual alias mappings for the users that must not > > be sent to the catch-all address. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > @example.com

Re: preventing backscatter with virtual_alias_maps

2008-11-28 Thread Wietse Venema
Ville Walveranta: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:47 AM, D G Teed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I can't understand the developer's notes, I usually emulate > > something that works from useful examples. > > As a relatively recent newcomer to Postfix (I've been running qmail since > 2002 and Pos