Re: postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org, Blacklists verwendbar?

mouss schrieb: > mouss a écrit : >> Matthias Haegele a écrit : >>> reject_rhsbl_sender bogusmx.abuseat.org >> ??? do you mean bogusmx.ref-ignorant.org? > > argh. bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org. > > if there's a typo.keyboard-ignorant.org, count me in. > Argh. Thanks. Seems i totally confused

RE: Altermime and postfix - permission denied, Command died with status 1

> Hi all > > I installed altermime to the working postfix + amavisd mail system > > Unfortunatelly altermime is not working properly. > > cat /etc/postfix/disclaimer > #!/bin/sh > > # System dependent settings > ALTERMIME=/usr/local/bin/altermime > ALTERMIME_DIR=/var/spool/altermime > SENDMAIL

RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

> == > #!/usr/bin/perl > > use warnings; > use strict; > use File::Copy; > > my $valid_recpts = "/home/exchange/virtual.txt"; # original > file from exchange my $relay_recps = > "/home/exchange/relay_recipients"; # final file that will be > postmapped my $dos2unix = `/usr/b

RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, virtual.db missing

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Cocker > Sent: 23 October 2008 10:29 > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Subject: RE: My first config - unable to telnet to port 25, > virtual.db missing > > > == > > #!/usr/bin

Re: Best anti-spam

Zitat von Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez escreveu: - I wouldn't set up a global greylist filter, because all my receiving mail is going to be delayed (I guess my users don't like this ;-)) after years deploying mail servers with greylistin

RE: Altermime and postfix - permission denied, Command died with status 1

-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-postfix- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jevos, Peter > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 9:56 AM > To: Postfix users > Subject: RE: Altermime and postfix - permission denied, Command died > with status 1 > > > > Hi all > > > > I

Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops

Dear all I'd like to ask you a question. In my master.cf is: smtp inet n - n - - smtpd 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd -o content_filter=disclaimer: -o local_recipient_maps= -o relay_recipien

RE: Altermime and postfix - permission denied, SOLVED - workaround

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-postfix- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jevos, Peter > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 2:43 PM > To: Postfix users > Subject: RE: Altermime and postfix - permission denied, Command died > with status 1 > > -Original Mess

Re: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops

Jevos, Peter a écrit : > Dear all > > I'd like to ask you a question. > > In my master.cf is: > > [snip] > ##disclaimer > disclaimer unix- n n - - pipe > flags=Rq user=altermime argv=/etc/postfix/filter/disclaimer -f > ${sender} -- ${recipient} > > > I

RE: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops

> -Original Message- > From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:01 PM > To: Jevos, Peter > Cc: Postfix users > Subject: Re: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops > > Jevos, Peter a écrit : > > Dear all > > > > I'd like to ask you a question. > > > >

Re: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops

Jevos, Peter a écrit : >> -Original Message- >> From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:01 PM >> To: Jevos, Peter >> Cc: Postfix users >> Subject: Re: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops >> >> Jevos, Peter a écrit : >>> Dear all >>> >>> I'd like

Maillog pattern grep script

Hi all http://gist.github.com/19021 It seems quite trivial now that its done, but hopefully someone else can benefit from it. The script greps for a pattern in the maillog, extracts the message id's and then greps for all lines matching the message id. The script is expensive to run, at 1+N (N =

Any good way to make this mail setup work

Having had my awareness of backscatter increased by this list (thanks everyone) I'm looking to improve the behaviour of our mail servers (and we've already taken a number of steps). Unfortunately I think our setup makes this pretty impossible without using a fairly unwieldy setup, but ideas welcome

Re: Content Filter - Advanced [SOLVED]

Disregard. On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Duane Hill wrote: I've been able to get a simple content filter running using the example from (http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html). However, am having problems getting it to run configured as shown under the advanced content filter section. I'm not seei

Inconsistency?

Is there any reason why the transport_table wants domain while sender_dependent_relayhost_maps wants @domain regards, Jan

RE: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops

> >> Jevos, Peter a écrit : > >>> Dear all > >>> > >>> I'd like to ask you a question. > >>> > >>> In my master.cf is: > >>> > >>> [snip] > >>> ##disclaimer > >>> disclaimer unix- n n - - pipe > >>> flags=Rq user=altermime argv=/etc/postfix/filter/disclaime

Re: Inconsistency?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:37:56PM +0200, Jan P. Kessler wrote: > Is there any reason why the transport_table wants > > domain Actully, it wants: domain transport[:nexthop] > while sender_dependent_relayhost_maps wants > > @domain Yes, the lookup key in transport was h

Re: [UNDERSTOOD, THANKS] Inconsistency?

Victor Duchovni wrote: > Yes, the lookup key in transport was historically domain only, and also > supports parent-domain lookups via .parent, while the address mapping > tables just support [EMAIL PROTECTED], @domain. So as not to confuse bare > users (for domains in $mydestination) with bare doma

Re: lost connection after CONNECT from localhost[127.0.0.1]

Diego Liziero: > Yes, definitely. > > > Postfix reports a broken connection as coming from "localhost" only > > when the kernel reports an errno of ENOTSOCK. > > Forgive me if I'm asking something you might have already answered, > is it easy to change the wrong error message for this case to > s

Re: Postfix - altermime - amavis - Too many hops

Peter, > > >>> disclaimer unix- n n - - pipe > > >>> flags=Rq user=altermime argv=/etc/postfix/filter/disclaimer -f > > >>> ${sender} -- ${recipient} > > >>> It leads to error: Too many hops , in the log there is loop. > > >> so your filter is passing mail

fighting spam with recipient limits

Hi, I'd like to be able to set a hard limit on the number of recipients that postfix will ever process, globally across my system. I see smtpd_recipient_limit but I think that would have the unintended consequence of "legitimizing" a ridiculous amount of recipients into multiple reasonable connec

Re: fighting spam with recipient limits

Eugene Vilensky wrote: Hi, I'd like to be able to set a hard limit on the number of recipients that postfix will ever process, globally across my system. I see smtpd_recipient_limit but I think that would have the unintended consequence of "legitimizing" a ridiculous amount of recipients into m

Outgoing IP address

I have an SMTP server down and would like to use another box temporarily. The IP address of the down server is setup with reverse DNS. I added this IP address as an alias to the interface on the temp box, can Postfix control the IP used to send and allow me to use that alias IP address when sending

Re: Outgoing IP address

Robert Fitzpatrick wrote, at 10/23/2008 03:58 PM: > I have an SMTP server down and would like to use another box > temporarily. The IP address of the down server is setup with reverse > DNS. I added this IP address as an alias to the interface on the temp > box, can Postfix control the IP used to s

Re: Outgoing IP address

Robert Fitzpatrick a écrit : > I have an SMTP server down and would like to use another box > temporarily. The IP address of the down server is setup with reverse > DNS. I added this IP address as an alias to the interface on the temp > box, can Postfix control the IP used to send and allow me to u

Re: Problem sending to one user on domain

On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:36 +0200, mouss wrote: > Robert Fitzpatrick a écrit : > > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 12:34 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote: > >> The current best use view of reject_unverified_(recipient|sender) is > >> to > >> use for your domains that you control. > > > > Thanks, and

Re: Likely Spam.

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Linux Addict wrote: > >> >> Nevermind.. I did strings on one of the messages on "deferred" and got the >> information. >> >> > use > postcat -q QUEUEID | more > to view the contents of a queued messsage. > > -- > Noel Jones >

Re: Likely Spam.

Linux Addict wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Linux Addict wrote: Nevermind.. I did strings on one of the messages on "deferred" and got the information. use postcat -q QUEUEID | more

Re: Likely Spam.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Linux Addict wrote: > > >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Noel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >>Linux Addict wrote: >> >> >>Nevermind.. I did strings on one of the messages on "deferr

Re: Likely Spam.

Linux Addict a écrit : > Unfortuantly that hosts also sends some legitimate mails. I just want to > block those two mail ids for now. unfortunately for you, if the host is owned, it will find other sender addresses... > > smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access > put the na

Re: Likely Spam.

Linux Addict wrote: Unfortuantly that hosts also sends some legitimate mails. I just want to block those two mail ids for now. smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access sender_access has following entries, but not working. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Likely Spam.

mouss wrote: Linux Addict a écrit : smtpd_sender_restrictions = hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access put the name of the check explicitely: smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access The OP is using deprecated but valid syntax. Postfix will assume

Re: Likely Spam.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:49 PM, mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Linux Addict a écrit : > > Unfortuantly that hosts also sends some legitimate mails. I just want to > > block those two mail ids for now. > > unfortunately for you, if the host is owned, it will find other sender > addresses... >

Re: Likely Spam.

Linux Addict a écrit : > > Thank you guys!! It worked. > > We have escalated to the DEV to fix the problem. Actually spammers are > exploiting "Email a Friend" option on our webpage inserting spam note, I like calling that "Email a victim" :) I once worked on a project which had a "Invite a fr

Re: Best anti-spam

Stroller wrote: On 22 Oct 2008, at 12:56, Richard Foley wrote: ... spam_ip_regex file: /[ax]dsl.*\..*\..*/i 450 AUTO_XDSL Email Rejected. You appear to be connecting from a Dynamic IP address. This looks fairly useful. Does anyone else have any experience with this approach, who might be

Re: Best anti-spam

Ron Winograd a écrit : > I'm in the same boat. One suggestion (if you are not already doing so) > is to take advantage of the fact that you can easily tell Postfix to > send email for only the problem domains through your ISP and > direct-deliver all the rest. Whenever I encounter a problem with a

Re: [OT] What is a condition for ideal mail server?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 mouss wrote: > Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : [...] > - Use the submission port (587) with TLS+SASL. What is different between using 25 and using 587? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkkBQ0sACgkQB00DNxnlnTayJQCdG

Re: [OT] What is a condition for ideal mail server?

On 23-Oct-08, at 8:38 PM, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: mouss wrote: Byung-Hee HWANG a écrit : [...] - Use the submission port (587) with TLS+SASL. What is different between using 25 and using 587? Use port 587 for SSL (TLS), instead of 25 plain/non-encrypted :) Mat X