(To avoid a couple separate mails, I merged some of the list replies.
Also, apologies for the delay.)
On 15 Sep 2008, at 06:52, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 13:59 -0300, Diego Ledesma wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm currently r
Neil wrote:
Unfortunately, that's currently unfeasible: while I've idly entertained
fantasies of trying to install a hypervisor on to my VPS instance, and
then running multiple servers from there, I'm not entirely sure it would
work out in practice as it does in theory... Barring that, I'd nee
* Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thank you both so much for your help. This was the problem - well, part
> of it anyway. After setting the above, I could see that authentication
> was failing. I could also see that Postfix was choosing CRAM-MD5. I
> knew from prior testing that met
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Choosing the mechanism is not done by Postfix, but by the Cyrus SASL library
libsasl, linked into the Postfix smtp client.
The rationale is "go for the most secure mechanism". PLAIN is, left on its
own, far less secure than CRAM-MD5; plain is secure only used in conju
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Drew Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thank you both so much for your help. This was the problem - well, part
of it anyway. After setting the above, I could see that authentication
was failing. I could also see that Postfix was choosing CRAM-MD5. I
knew fro
>So it would comfortable if the postfix accepts all mails when
>the sqlgrey is ot of order.
We are facing the same problem.
Are there any new thoughts from the official maintainers of Postfix about
implementing a 'dunno' fallback on a failing check_policy_service ?
The current 4xx solution will
Hi,
I currently have an old qmail toaster (customized some) setup. I have been
wanting to build a new mail server for a while, and just finally got around to
doing it. My old system is setup with qmail, vpopmail, squirrelmail, spam
assassin, smtpauth, autorespond, qmailadmin, vqadmin, clamav,
Wayne Catterton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I looked at alternative MTA's and found postfix. It looks like
> it's exactly what I'm looking for, however I am not sure on what all I
> need to install to keep the mail system fairly secure and protected.
> So I started looking through installatio
Wayne Catterton wrote:
Hi,
I currently have an old qmail toaster (customized some) setup. I have been
wanting to build a new mail server for a while, and just finally got around to
doing it. My old system is setup with qmail, vpopmail, squirrelmail, spam
assassin, smtpauth, autorespond, qma
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 10:08 -0700, Wayne Catterton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently have an old qmail toaster (customized some) setup. I have
> been wanting to build a new mail server for a while, and just finally
> got around to doing it. My old system is setup with qmail, vpopmail,
> squirrelmail
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
i think you had better use "google apps" instead of postfix ;;
some of us still consider mail to be private ;-p
> > i think you had better use "google apps" instead of postfix ;;
> some of us still consider mail to be private ;-p
Ditto.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:45:32 +0900
Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think you had better use "google apps" instead of postfix ;;
I assume that is a joke.
--
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The temperature of the aqueous content of an unremittingly ogled
culinary vessel will not achieve 1
J . Thomsen:
> >So it would comfortable if the postfix accepts all mails when
> >the sqlgrey is ot of order.
>
> We are facing the same problem.
>
> Are there any new thoughts from the official maintainers of Postfix about
> implementing a 'dunno' fallback on a failing check_policy_service ?
>
>
On 09/21/2008 12:08:08 PM, Wayne Catterton wrote:
What I'm wondering is if I missed something, is there something vital
I missed as far as security/mail processing?
I like sqlgrey, others prefer postgrey.
Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/21/2008 12:08:08 PM, Wayne Catterton wrote:
>> What I'm wondering is if I missed something, is there something vital
>> I missed as far as security/mail processing?
>
> I like sqlgrey, others prefer postgrey.
+1 for postgrey.
--
Sahil Tandon <[EMA
mouss wrote:
> J. Bakshi wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I get an error like "postfix/master[18801]: fatal: 127.0.0.1:smtps:
>> Servname not supported for ai_socktype"
>> below is my main.cf of postfix. Could any one give me a clue ?
>>
>
> what does
> # grep smtps /etc/services
> return?
>
Good mornin
J. Bakshi wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>
>> J. Bakshi wrote:
>>
>>> Dear list,
>>>
>>> I get an error like "postfix/master[18801]: fatal: 127.0.0.1:smtps:
>>> Servname not supported for ai_socktype"
>>> below is my main.cf of postfix. Could any one give me a clue ?
>>>
>>>
>> what does
>>
J. Bakshi wrote:
J. Bakshi wrote:
mouss wrote:
J. Bakshi wrote:
Dear list,
I get an error like "postfix/master[18801]: fatal: 127.0.0.1:smtps:
Servname not supported for ai_socktype"
below is my main.cf of postfix. Could any one give me a clue ?
what does
# grep smtps /etc/s
19 matches
Mail list logo
