gerrit wrote:
Hi All,
Recently i implemented the sender check. First i made a split for the
processing and put some restrictions under smtpd_sender_restrictions and
some under stmpd_recipient_restrictions.
This resulted in too many rejections, so i left the sender restrictions
emtpy and put
thanks mouss but in my mains.cf there is
mailbox_transport=lmtp:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp
virtual_transport=$mailbox_transport
so virtual transport is used for cyrus
in the lmtp log in verbose mode there is
Sep 6 10:55:03 pc-touzeau postfix/lmtp[19755]: send attr diag_type =
Sep 6 10:5
Hi everybody,
i'm trying to configure my postfix for ldap lookups, but with strange
results.
My ldap record has 2 important fields: 'mail' and 'uid'. Postfix should
use the 'mail' field to verify the recipient and than save the email
into /mail/'uid'/Maildir
From main.cf:
[..]
alias_maps
TOUZEAU DAVID wrote:
thanks mouss but in my mains.cf there is
mailbox_transport=lmtp:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp
virtual_transport=$mailbox_transport
compare with
$ postconf -d virtual_transport
virtual_transport = virtual
so virtual transport is used for cyrus
do you see any "postfi
Tommaso Visconti wrote:
Hi everybody,
i'm trying to configure my postfix for ldap lookups, but with strange
results.
My ldap record has 2 important fields: 'mail' and 'uid'. Postfix should
use the 'mail' field to verify the recipient and than save the email
into /mail/'uid'/Maildir
From m
James Robertson wrote:
We have a client who has done a mailout which adds up to over 1GB in
size.
..
1160910 Kbytes in 988 Requests
..
Is there a way I can slow down or throttle the speed at which email is
being sent from a specific email address once the mail is already active?
Just
Hi all.
Some time ago I set up a spammers' trap in the way of a fake webmail
service where they can register for a "free account".
Up until now I was just saving their details (name,current email,ip,..)
in a database and never sending them the "account" login information.
Since many of the scammers
mouss wrote, at 09/06/2008 05:12 AM:
TOUZEAU DAVID wrote:
pc-touzeau.klf.fr[/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp]: RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so you see. postfix says "RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>".
Sep 6 10:55:18 pc-touzeau postfix/lmtp[19755]: >
pc-touzeau.klf.fr[/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp]: DATA
S
Andrea Gozzi:
> Hi all.
> Some time ago I set up a spammers' trap in the way of a fake webmail
> service where they can register for a "free account".
> Up until now I was just saving their details (name,current email,ip,..)
> in a database and never sending them the "account" login information.
>
No the ^ is supported by cyrus... i i create a mailbox usr/david.t it's
working.
the problem is to force postfix to lookup the LDAP database in order to
find the right uid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as a real mailbox called dtouzeau has the uid in LDAP
here it is the postconf -n
address_verify_negative
TOUZEAU DAVID wrote:
No the ^ is supported by cyrus... i i create a mailbox usr/david.t it's
working.
the problem is to force postfix to lookup the LDAP database in order to
find the right uid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as a real mailbox called dtouzeau has the uid in LDAP
postfix doesn't lookup the
Many thanks mouss,
I udnerstand.. better way is to create an alias... so ... for me the
case is closed
mouss a écrit :
TOUZEAU DAVID wrote:
No the ^ is supported by cyrus... i i create a mailbox usr/david.t
it's working.
the problem is to force postfix to lookup the LDAP database in order
to
What is the best way to filter OUTgoing mail for spam?
I have postfix with postgrey and quite a few rbl lists and restrictions.
Unfortunately this only takes care of some spam.
We have a network where sometimes clients pc's can get infected and we want
to avoid sending spam!
A
How do you know it's not someone who honestly wants a webmail account..?
-N.
On Sep 6, 2008, at 5:35 AM, Andrea Gozzi wrote:
Hi all.
Some time ago I set up a spammers' trap in the way of a fake webmail
service where they can register for a "free account".
Up until now I was just saving their d
Marcel Grandemange wrote:
What is the best way to filter OUTgoing mail for spam?
I have postfix with postgrey and quite a few rbl lists and restrictions.
Unfortunately this only takes care of some spam.
We have a network where sometimes clients pc’s can get infected and we
want
Jos Chrispijn wrote:
James Robertson wrote:
We have a client who has done a mailout which adds up to over 1GB in
size.
..
1160910 Kbytes in 988 Requests
..
Is there a way I can slow down or throttle the speed at which email is
being sent from a specific email address once the mail is
> What is the best way to filter OUTgoing mail for spam?
>
>
>
> I have postfix with postgrey and quite a few rbl lists and restrictions.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately this only takes care of some spam.
>
>
>
>
>
> We have a network where sometimes clients pc's can get infected and we
> wan
Marcel Grandemange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Or use a policy service that limits the number of messages a
> >specific client can send. Here's a popular one that works
> >well and has lots of other features:
> >http://policyd.sourceforge.net/
>
> That's what I thought postgrey did?
No, po
Hi Folks
I have tried to setup a whitelist for some domains, the idea is to have
the whitelisted domains bypass RBL and spamassassin checks (ie. deliver
everything!).
/etc/postfix/main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
Derek wrote:
Hi Folks
I have tried to setup a whitelist for some domains, the idea is to have
the whitelisted domains bypass RBL and spamassassin checks (ie. deliver
everything!).
/etc/postfix/main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
Hi, all.
I'd like to know whether it is possible to bypass content_filter based
on whether someone has authenticated via SASL.
The situation:
I would like to build a machine that can function both to scrub
spam/viruses for incoming mail (to my clients) and handle outgoing mail
using SMTP-A
Ian R. Justman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to know whether it is possible to bypass content_filter
> based on whether someone has authenticated via SASL.
If users authenticate via the submission (587) port, you can modify the
service in master.cf with something like:
-o content_f
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Ian R. Justman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to know whether it is possible to bypass content_filter
based on whether someone has authenticated via SASL.
If users authenticate via the submission (587) port, you can modify the
service in master.cf with something like
Ian R. Justman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure you comprehended what I was asking.
Careless reading on my part -- sorry for that.
> I am very specifically asking about port _25_. I'd like to be able
> to bypass content_filter= based on whether the user has
24 matches
Mail list logo
