ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a custom milter setup on my shared postfix servers that allow
> customers to maintain their own blacklists
>
> A domain admin can simply reject mails at the MTA. ( That gets rid of
> all NDR's are backscatter automatically )
> But that fails when a smtp
Hi,
I'd like to send logging for emails sent from a specific IP to a different
syslog facility. I am able to define the port used by the sending machine and
have configured a new instance of smtpd to listen on 26 with the '-o
syslog_facility=' parameter. This successfully captures the connection
Rob Kelledy wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to send logging for emails sent from a specific IP to a different
syslog facility. I am able to define the port used by the sending machine and
have configured a new instance of smtpd to listen on 26 with the '-o
syslog_facility=' parameter. This successfully ca
Hi folks,
Does anybody know a free milter to encrypt / sign EMails on
the fly using GnuPG, depending upon the receiver address and
maybe other attributes?
Of course I checked the ad-on lists for postfix or sendmail.
There are some proprietary solutions, but surely I would
prefer free software.
Hi all,
I've reconfigured our website email system, so auto-generated emails
now have a valid From: and Reply-To: header ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and use
an alternate envelope-FROM ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Now I have seen a lot of auto-reply mails (aka "I am on holidays and
back in september"). These mail
Stefan Palme wrote:
Hi all,
I've reconfigured our website email system, so auto-generated emails
now have a valid From: and Reply-To: header ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and use
an alternate envelope-FROM ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Now I have seen a lot of auto-reply mails (aka "I am on holidays and
back in s
Stefan Palme:
> Hi all,
>
> I've reconfigured our website email system, so auto-generated emails
> now have a valid From: and Reply-To: header ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and use
> an alternate envelope-FROM ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> Now I have seen a lot of auto-reply mails (aka "I am on holidays and
> b
Hi,
I was reading in [1] and I do not have much experience with Postfix I came
the following questions:
In smtpd_sender_restrictions session, for example, he lists some settings
possible.
These settings for each session are limited to those listed?
[1] - http://www.postfix.org/uce.html#smtpd_
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eduardo_J=FAnior?=:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I was reading in [1] and I do not have much experience with Postfix I came
> the following questions:
>
> In smtpd_sender_restrictions session, for example, he lists some settings
> possible.
> These settings for each session are limited to those
Hi again,
where do I get information about current well known
services to be used for
reject_rbl_client
reject_rhsbl_sender
reject_rhsbl_recipient
Thanks and regards
-stefan-
On 21-Aug-2008, at 11:26, mouss wrote:
Erm... at least that was in postfix22, not sure if it's in 2.5.x
That's the third-party spf patch. It's still available in the ports.
I don't see it. must be an old ports tree?
# cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix; make config
On 28-Aug-2008, at 08:15, Stefan Palme wrote:
reject_rbl_client
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
That's it, all you need.
--
"Woof bloody woof."
Eduardo Júnior wrote:
Hi,
I was reading in [1] and I do not have much experience with Postfix I
came the following questions:
In smtpd_sender_restrictions session, for example, he lists some
settings possible.
These settings for each session are limited to those listed?
[1] - http://w
Hi,
>>
>> [1] - http://www.postfix.org/uce.html#smtpd_sender_restrictions
>>
>>
> That page is no longer maintained. Please see instead:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sender_restrictions
Thanks,
Im sorry for the lack of attention
[]´s
--
Eduardo Júnior
GNU/Linux user #423
Hi,
I would like to configure a bizarre setup like this:
if the mail is sent as usual, do not use a smart-host, just
deliver (that is easy and works)
if the recipient domain ends in ".through-smart-host", it should
deliver via a SMTP relay (smart-host). Of course, just before
deli
Hi guys:
I'm fresh at postfix. Resently, we have built the postfix for our web
service. We would like to deliver some e-magzines to our registered users.
but the size of each magzine is over 1 M. but we have hundreds of thousands
users. As a result, the bandwidth is embarrassing. Since most of our
* shawn D.Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi guys:
>
> I'm fresh at postfix. Resently, we have built the postfix for our web
> service. We would like to deliver some e-magzines to our registered users.
> but the size of each magzine is over 1 M. but we have hundreds of thousands
> users. As a result,
Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to configure a bizarre setup like this:
if the mail is sent as usual, do not use a smart-host, just
deliver (that is easy and works)
if the recipient domain ends in ".through-smart-host", it should
deliver via a SMTP relay (smart-host). Of cour
Hi,
We have a printer IP segment/VLAN which is only printers and these
printers are also scanners, and they email the scan back to the user.
Since the scan outputs frequently exceed the configured
message_size_limit of 7.5MB, in master.cf I configured a non-standard
port (2526) that is restr
Marc SCHAEFER wrote:
Hi,
I would like to configure a bizarre setup like this:
if the mail is sent as usual, do not use a smart-host, just
deliver (that is easy and works)
if the recipient domain ends in ".through-smart-host", it should
deliver via a SMTP relay (smart-host). Of cour
Hello everyone!
Do we have some 5xx error code, which drop connection immediately as it fo
421?
>From docs:
"Use "421" reply codes for botnet-related RBLs or for selected non-RBL
restrictions. This causes Postfix 2.3 and later to disconnect immediately
without waiting for the remote SMTP client t
Alex wrote:
Hello everyone!
Do we have some 5xx error code, which drop connection immediately as it fo
421?
No. and it's even worst: even if you implement code that does so, the
client will probably ignore the 5xx error and consider the disconnect as
a temp failure. so all you get is 421 beh
What is the maximum number of addresses to have in a multi-recipient
alias? I realize a real mailing list system like majordomo or mailman is
better for large numbers but I need to use aliases for now 'till I have
time to set it up and need to know how many I can use before I start to
run into
Rob Tanner:
> Hi,
>
> We have a printer IP segment/VLAN which is only printers and these
> printers are also scanners, and they email the scan back to the user.
> Since the scan outputs frequently exceed the configured
> message_size_limit of 7.5MB, in master.cf I configured a non-standard
>
Chris St Denis:
> What is the maximum number of addresses to have in a multi-recipient
> alias? I realize a real mailing list system like majordomo or mailman is
> better for large numbers but I need to use aliases for now 'till I have
> time to set it up and need to know how many I can use befo
mouss wrote:
Alex wrote:
Hello everyone!
Do we have some 5xx error code, which drop connection immediately as
it fo
421?
No. and it's even worst: even if you implement code that does so, the
client will probably ignore the 5xx error and consider the disconnect as
a temp failure. so all yo
On 8/28/08 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Rob Tanner:
Hi,
We have a printer IP segment/VLAN which is only printers and these
printers are also scanners, and they email the scan back to the user.
Since the scan outputs frequently exceed the configured
message_size_limit of 7.5MB, in mas
> Unfortunately, "521" is not a valid response code, and you
> must issue "421" if you intend to disconnect.
>
> I fiddled with a small "550 reject + 421 disconnect" patch for
> a while, but it just didn't seem to make enough difference to
> be worth the effort of maintaining a local patch of
> qu
At this time, using 421 as a reply code can reduce the over-all
mail load. Only standards-compliant software comes back.
Wietse
> Setting smtpd_delay_reject = no isn't always a good idea.
> Reducing smtpd_hard_error_limit and smtpd_timeout is a very
> good idea if you haven't done that yet.
Yes, I have seen it and working on suitable values for these variables.
>>
>> //I'll try to find patch in archives, thanks.
>>
>
> I'
Hello.
A few weeks ago and out of the blue i started getting some messages deferred
at random times.
Aug 28 18:44:30 mailserver postfix/qmgr[13315]: EDD5B3505B4: from=<
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=14529, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Aug 28 19:04:30 mailserver postfix/smtp[27936]: EDD5B3505B4: to=<
[EMAIL P
Hello, everyone,
I have a box running 2.2.3 and encounter the following problem.
The box is behind a firewall (ISA), and is under attack frequently ( a lots of
SMTP connections). When there are a lot of SMTP connection requests arriving at
the box, Postfix does not reject them, instead it put t
Jie Wang wrote:
> Hello, everyone,
>
> I have a box running 2.2.3 and encounter the following problem.
>
> The box is behind a firewall (ISA), and is under attack frequently ( a
> lots of SMTP connections). When there are a lot of SMTP connection
> requests arriving at the box, Postfix does n
Diego Ledesma:
> Hello.
> A few weeks ago and out of the blue i started getting some messages deferred
> at random times.
>
> Aug 28 18:44:30 mailserver postfix/qmgr[13315]: EDD5B3505B4: from=<
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=14529, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
> Aug 28 19:04:30 mailserver postfix/smtp[27936
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diego Ledesma:
> > Hello.
> > A few weeks ago and out of the blue i started getting some messages
> deferred
> > at random times.
> >
> > Aug 28 18:44:30 mailserver postfix/qmgr[13315]: EDD5B3505B4: from=<
> > [EMAIL PROTE
Diego Ledesma:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Wietse Venema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Diego Ledesma:
> > > Hello.
> > > A few weeks ago and out of the blue i started getting some messages
> > deferred
> > > at random times.
> > >
> > > Aug 28 18:44:30 mailserver postfix/qmgr[13315]: EDD
Diego Ledesma wrote:
What do you mean by mail server at 127.0.0.1? . That address (localhost)
belongs to the mail server with the issue itself. Every mail-related thing
is running on one mail server only (postfix-amavis-clamav).
By content filter you mean that amavis (the only content filter we h
Hi,
is there a builtin way to make postfix remember bouncing recipient
addresses, so that further attempts to send mails to those addresses
can be rejected?
I do NOT want to use active recipient address verification. I only want
to save when a real mail delivery attempt fails - so this seems to b
* Jie Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello, everyone,
>
> I have a box running 2.2.3 and encounter the following problem.
>
> The box is behind a firewall (ISA), and is under attack frequently ( a
> lots of SMTP connections).
Who says that it's an attack.
> When there are a lot of SMTP connection
39 matches
Mail list logo
