Re: your mail

On 5 Jun 2018, at 02:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: in postyfix queue each mail does have its unique ID. However, when pushed through any kind of content filter, the ID changes. Also, when mail gets forwarded, the ID changes. On 05.06.18 02:30, @lbutlr wrote: A new ID will be ADDED, but th

Re: your mail

On 5 Jun 2018, at 02:22, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > in postyfix queue each mail does have its unique ID. However, when pushed > through any kind of content filter, the ID changes. > Also, when mail gets forwarded, the ID changes. A new ID will be ADDED, but the original one remains in the h

Re: your mail

On 04.06.18 15:34, Greg Strange wrote: I am trying to track a single email throughout the entire postfix process. The idea is that when a customer calls us and says that a certain email never reached them, we can quickly trace the email through the logs and see that it died due to RBL, virus thre

Re: The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server.

Mike McKoy: > Is this a good situation for using masquerading? If not in what situations > would one want to use that. In my prior example, I used "-o myhostname=mta-name-here" in addition to the "-o smtp_bind_address=mta-address-here". Wietse

Re: The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server.

strange... when i check DNS tools and reverse dns check 52.0.148.79 it tells me that it returns mymodeltalk.com and that this is correct. Why would I need to have a another IP to RDNs from the hostname? I don't want to send mail from it... only from mymodeltalk orinform.mymodeltalk.com. -- Mike Mc

Re: The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server.

On 05/20/2015 06:45 PM, Mike McKoy wrote: > Is this a good situation for using masquerading? No. > If not in what situations would one want to use that. Fixing the envelope sender and/or recipient from broken email clients, among other things. The solution to your issue is to just fix your DNS

The hostname in the SMTP greeting does not match the reverse DNS (PTR) record for your mail server.

Is this a good situation for using masquerading? If not in what situations would one want to use that. -- Mike McKoy *404.590.7176* http://MyForeverHair.com http://www.MyModelTalk.com http://InCrowdUSA.net http://www.google.com/profiles/mikemckoy

Re: your mail

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:39:57AM +0200, sumsu...@gmx.de wrote: > relayhost = relay.domain.com Had you not obfuscated the relay name, you'd have your answer already. You should also post log entries exhibiting the unwated behaviour. Typically ISP relays are hostnames not MX records: rel

Re: your mail

* BONNET, Frank : > Hello > > Since I activated SMTP TLS ( client and server = may ) on our mail gateway > I have this message in maillog > > Untrusted TLS connection established to ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM[173.194.66.27]:25: > TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits) Your smtp client has successfuly

Re: your mail

baptiste jamin: > We have a non common mail system: > > All mails are normaly sent to a local service. This home made service > manage our different adresses. > > In fact the "local_recipient_maps =" directive allow every recipient. This is incorrect. With "local_recipient_maps =", the Postfix

Re: your mail

baptiste jamin: > Hello, > > I'm a french administrator. > > Since 3 days, i've some "unknown user" errors. > > I use the directive "local_recipient_maps =" in my main.cf As documented in http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#local_recipient_maps If this parameter is non-empty (the

Re: your mail

On 1/28/2013 3:30 AM, Dibyendra Hyoju wrote: > Hi Stan, > > I checked the log and I found out that the email was not sent because of > authentication issues. But, I checked the /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd and the > username and password is correct. I copied the same info into my local > machine and i

Re: your mail

Hi Stan, I checked the log and I found out that the email was not sent because of authentication issues. But, I checked the /etc/postfix/sasl_passwd and the username and password is correct. I copied the same info into my local machine and it's working fine. The log contains following information:

Re: your mail

On 1/27/2013 4:21 AM, Dibyendra Hyoju wrote: > Postfix seems to be working but it's not sending email, maybe because of > the configurations? > > root@library:/home/madan# telnet localhost 25 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to localhost. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 library.net.np ESMTP Po

Re: your mail

Hi James, Thanks for your response. On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:41 PM, James Griffin wrote: > * Will [2013-01-27 01:23:31 -0600]: > > > On 01/27/2013 12:41 AM, Dibyendra Hyoju wrote: > > >220 library.net.np ESMTP Sendmail > > >8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:

Re: your mail

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, James Griffin wrote: As pointed out by Will, the program listening on port 25 for smtpd connections is Sendmail version 8.14. This is, I imagine, the default MTA installed on a Debian system which from the output of your telnet session indicates you're using. FWIW, Debian'

Re: your mail

* Will [2013-01-27 01:23:31 -0600]: > On 01/27/2013 12:41 AM, Dibyendra Hyoju wrote: > >220 library.net.np ESMTP Sendmail > >8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:31:43 -0600; (No UCE/UBE) > >logging access from: localhost(OK)-localhost [127.0.0.1] > > This seems

Re: your mail

On 01/27/2013 12:41 AM, Dibyendra Hyoju wrote: 220 library.net.np ESMTP Sendmail 8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:31:43 -0600; (No UCE/UBE) logging access from: localhost(OK)-localhost [127.0.0.1] This seems to indicate that you are communicating with a Send

Re: your mail

Dibyendra Hyoju: > I have installed postfix in my local machine and it's working. In the > configuration I added following line: > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/24 > > However, in the rackspace having IP: 50.57.179.51, I could not get postfix > to work. I am not sure what configuration is

Re: your mail

ma...@kraner.us: > I can see the mail coming but doesn't show up in the inbox.. Anyone have > any ideas? ... > Dec 31 13:35:35 kraner postfix/local[2958]: 7109B40AB8: > to=, relay=local, delay=0.16, delays=0.14/0.01/0/0.01, > dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to maildir) Where *is* it supposed to

Re: your mail

Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: >* Matt Horrocks : >> Hi, >> >> I'm setting up postfix for the first time. >> >> In the UK, the entire sky.com ip range is on the >> Spamhaus PBL [http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL251585 >> ]. >> >> I

Re: your mail

On 11/12/2012 12:11 AM, Matt Horrocks wrote: > Hi, > > I'm setting up postfix for the first time. > > In the UK, the entire sky.com ip range is on the > Spamhaus PBL [http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL251585 > ]. > > I thought that

Re: your mail

* Matt Horrocks : > Hi, > > I'm setting up postfix for the first time. > > In the UK, the entire sky.com ip range is on the > Spamhaus PBL [http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/query/PBL251585 > ]. > > I thought that the main.cf

Re: your mail

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > achal tomar: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema > wrote: > > > > > achal tomar: > > > > So wietse can how can i send mail with PHP script to my mail server > which > > > > has postfix on it so that the return path of mails s

Re: your mail

achal tomar: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > achal tomar: > > > So wietse can how can i send mail with PHP script to my mail server which > > > has postfix on it so that the return path of mails send has the > > following:- > > > > > > Assume there is a user called a

Re: your mail

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > achal tomar: > > So wietse can how can i send mail with PHP script to my mail server which > > has postfix on it so that the return path of mails send has the > following:- > > > > Assume there is a user called ac...@example.net and that an

Re: your mail

achal tomar: > So wietse can how can i send mail with PHP script to my mail server which > has postfix on it so that the return path of mails send has the following:- > > Assume there is a user called ac...@example.net and that an individual, > b...@example.org has has to be send mai. > >- re

Always check for irregular mail usage of your mail server

http://www.nk.ca/blog/index.php?/archives/1275-Phishing-spam-mail-script-intercepted.html -- Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising! https://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Onta

Re: your mail

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 10:34:57 +0300, kibirango moses wrote: > I configured recipient_blacklist using postfix as below in order to > block users from replying fake emails. > > But i am getting problems with my mail clients as they are unable to send > mail. Show logs that relate exactly to the

Re: your mail

Ravindra Gupta // Viva: > Hiii, > > How to improve postfix server sending speed, any parameters required in > main.cf file so confirm me. > My requirement is we will send minimum 500 to 600 email in less then 1 > minutes. Throughput = concurrency / latency. What is your latency? Is it dominated

Re: your mail

On Wed, 20 May 2009, Matt Hersant wrote: > I'm having problems with spam for users who forge the sender to appear as > one of my domains. The spam is coming from an external mail server. Is > there anything I can add to my main.cf to combat this? Any suggestions are > appreciated. Please inclu

Re: your mail

On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:32:10PM -0700, Jonathan McMahon wrote: > > I'm trying to set up an extremely basic mailserver on Leopard 10.5 in order > to check the behavior of some PHP scripts. Nothing fancy needed - I just want > to send and receive mail to/from myself without having to go out to

Re: your mail

* Len Conrad : > 1. my email client discarded my wonderful Subject: line Your client is Imail? Their servers are crap so why should the client be better :) > 2. The problem is that a query for 67.218.188.4 is not matched by an > entry of 67.218.188. This works in hash:.map tables, so why doesn

Re: your mail

Len Conrad wrote: postmap -q "67.218.188" mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql-mta_clients_reactive_b.cf 554 mta_client_reactive_b postmap -q "67.218.188.4" mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql-mta_clients_reactive_b.cf ... no data man 5 access seems to make no distinction between .map and SQL

Re: your mail

-- Original Message -- From: Ralf Hildebrandt Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 20:56:15 +0200 >* Len Conrad : >> postmap -q "67.218.188" >> mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql-mta_clients_reactive_b.cf >> 554 mta_client_reactive_b

Re: your mail

* Len Conrad : > postmap -q "67.218.188" > mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql-mta_clients_reactive_b.cf > 554 mta_client_reactive_b > > postmap -q "67.218.188.4" > mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql-mta_clients_reactive_b.cf > ... no data > > man 5 access seems to make no distinction between

Re: your mail

On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Daniel C wrote: > Since a upgrade I made last week I've been having a very strange issue. > Whenever I send an email using my server as an SMTP (with Cyrus-SASL > authentication), all my emails are sent in double. Also, when I send an > email using Imp/Horde (Webmail), emails

RE: your mail -- Virtual Domain with Postfix & LDAP

Dear List, On Wednesday, January 21, 2009 3:04 AM Magnus Bäck wrote >Okay, but since you allegedly list both domains in mydestination this >will never be used. mydestination "wins" over virtual_mailbox_domains. >Unless, of course, you've set local_transport = virtual. >Anyway, time to see the

Re: your mail -- Virtual Domain with Postfix & LDAP

On Tuesday, January 20, 2009 at 11:23 CET, Goutam Baul wrote: > On Tuesday.January 20,2009 Magnus Bäck wrote > > > Where have you made this definition? Two domains listed in > > mydestination by definition have the same set of localparts, i.e. > > I am giving below the portion of the main.c

RE: your mail -- Virtual Domain with Postfix & LDAP

On Tuesday.January 20,2009 Magnus Bäck wrote >>On Monday, January 19, 2009 at 10:50 CET, >>Goutam Baul wrote: >> I am trying to configure postfix 2.2.10 in a way that two of my group >> companies can get their mailing services from one physical server >> machine. The two companies are having

Re: your mail

On Monday, January 19, 2009 at 10:50 CET, Goutam Baul wrote: > I am trying to configure postfix 2.2.10 in a way that two of my group > companies can get their mailing services from one physical server > machine. The two companies are having their separate domains > registered and the name sp

Re: your mail

On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Petr Janda wrote: Hi all, I have got reports about lost mail(not received, im the receiver not the sender) recently and trying to find out whats going on seems to be beyond me. Basically a lot of email is lost with "timeout after DATA" For example: timeout after DATA (0