> On 24/02/21 11:47 am, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>> Added Virus scanning to a SOHO stetup. clamav-milter is directing (?)
> "infected" mail to postfix HOLD queue.
>
> Perhaps rather than having clamav-milter put the message on hold, it
> might be possible to have clamav-milter simply flag the me
On 24/02/21 11:47 am, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Added Virus scanning to a SOHO stetup. clamav-milter is directing (?)
"infected" mail to postfix HOLD queue.
Perhaps rather than having clamav-milter put the message on hold, it
might be possible to have clamav-milter simply flag the message (by
Joe Acquisto-j4:
> Added Virus scanning to a SOHO stetup. clamav-milter is directing
> (?) "infected" mail to postfix HOLD queue.
>
> That's fine.
>
> First thought is to process the queue'd mail, alter the subject
> line, based on the added descriptive header line, and deliver it
> to the intend
Added Virus scanning to a SOHO stetup. clamav-milter is directing (?)
"infected" mail to postfix HOLD queue.
That's fine.
First thought is to process the queue'd mail, alter the subject line, based on
the added descriptive header line, and
deliver it to the intended user(s). I don't cons
