Il 14/01/2024 18:57, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto:
Does the other .eu mailinglist sill work?
If you mean the .space one, it does, but I had to also remove the
canonical map :)
I had a schleuder .space list, (still) working
Now I have a schleuder .eu list, also working
Plus ther
roughnecks via Postfix-users:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Il 14/01/2024 15:56, roughnecks via Postfix-users ha scritto:
> > Il 14/01/2024 15:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto:
> >> To receive receive list mail fordecentralize-send...@w
Il 14/01/2024 15:56, roughnecks via Postfix-users ha scritto:
Il 14/01/2024 15:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto:
To receive receive list mail fordecentralize-send...@wood...nest.eu
you need to list wood...nest.eu in mydestination.
But I believe I read in several places in the doc
ally exist.. It's for .eu
There are some things that can be improved on this configuration,
(for example it will accept and then bounce mail for non-existent
recipients in wood...nest.eu, and you are using two different kinds
of virtual domains), but you already have two mailing lists working
a
ally exist.. It's for .eu
There are some things that can be improved on this configuration,
(for example it will accept and then bounce mail for non-existent
recipients in wood...nest.eu, and you are using two different kinds
of virtual domains), but you already have two mailing lists working
a
some things that can be improved on this configuration,
(for example it will accept and then bounce mail for non-existent
recipients in wood...nest.eu, and you are using two different kinds
of virtual domains), but you already have two mailing lists working
and I don't want to break those.
Il 14/01/2024 15:52, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto:
To receive receive list mail fordecentralize-send...@wood...nest.eu
you need to list wood...nest.eu in mydestination.
But I believe I read in several places in the docs to NOT add a virtual
domain to mydestination.. Didn't I unde
roughnecks via Postfix-users:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Il 14/01/2024 14:07, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto:
>
> > If there are any schleuder users on this list, maybe someone knows
> > what you are talking about.
> >
> > For the re
Il 14/01/2024 14:07, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users ha scritto:
If there are any schleuder users on this list, maybe someone knows
what you are talking about.
For the rest of the readership, concrete informnation (settings,
not beliefs) is needed.
https://paste.woodpeckersnest.space/?65a0285
roughnecks via Postfix-users:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hello,
>
> sorry for the little OT, but I asked schleuder team and they weren't
> able to assist me.
>
> My postfix conf has a virtual domain set up.
> At first I only had one domain and
Hello,
sorry for the little OT, but I asked schleuder team and they weren't
able to assist me.
My postfix conf has a virtual domain set up.
At first I only had one domain and my first schleuder list was made for
that domain and it still works today.
Now I wanted to start a new ML on the vir
ostfix-users
wrote:
> I am trying to set up a virtual domains on a server and either end up with
> no mail being delivered, or mail being delivered but with warning:
>
> do not list domain example2.co.uk in BOTH virtual_alias_domains and
> relay_domains.
>
> What I am trying
I am trying to set up a virtual domains on a server and either end up with
no mail being delivered, or mail being delivered but with warning:
do not list domain example2.co.uk in BOTH virtual_alias_domains and
relay_domains.
What I am trying to do is
* Configure a dedicated server to host 5
Scratch this: I've spotted my typo
Thanks
Ken
Ken Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi All,
I'm sure I'm missing some subtle point in the documentation but could
someone kindly clarify for me. This is postfix 3.5.8 on a Rocky Linux
system. Delivery is by lmtp to cyrus-imap on another machine.
Hi All,
I'm sure I'm missing some subtle point in the documentation but could
someone kindly clarify for me. This is postfix 3.5.8 on a Rocky Linux
system. Delivery is by lmtp to cyrus-imap on another machine.
My e-mail domain kensnet.org, among others, is set up as a virtual
domain. There i
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 11:56:41AM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
> Does virtual domains (such as virtual_alias_domains) support wildcard?
> such as putting this one in the file:
>
> *.foo.com
>
> so that one.foo.com, two.foo.com... will be a recipient domain.
You
Hello list,
sorry for the silly question.
does virtual domains (such as virtual_alias_domains) support wildcast?
such as putting this one in the file:
*.foo.com
so that one.foo.com, two.foo.com... will be a recipient domain.
Thanks.
--
sent from https://dkinbox.com
On 4/15/22 10:15 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 14.04.22 08:26, Emmett Culley wrote:
I recently changed the host name of one of the servers from one domain I am
hosting to another of the domains the server is serving.
Upon verifying the server I noticed that the Received: headers on emai
On 14.04.22 08:26, Emmett Culley wrote:
I recently changed the host name of one of the servers from one domain I am
hosting to another of the domains the server is serving.
Upon verifying the server I noticed that the Received: headers on email
sent via that server now have the new host name
On 4/14/22 9:58 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Emmett Culley:
Is there anything I can do to specify that the Recieved: headers
have the "correct" domain name depending on what domain is sending
an email (From:)?
The Received: headers contain the value of the "myhostname" parameter,
i.e. the identit
Emmett Culley:
> Is there anything I can do to specify that the Recieved: headers
> have the "correct" domain name depending on what domain is sending
> an email (From:)?
The Received: headers contain the value of the "myhostname" parameter,
i.e. the identity of this Postfix MTA instance. This na
On 4/14/22 8:38 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 4/14/22 09:26, Emmett Culley wrote:
I would include the output of postconf, but it is very large and I don't know how to narrow it down to what is needed to help resolve this issue.
Try "postconf -n". This should only show settings that are differen
On 4/14/22 09:26, Emmett Culley wrote:
I would include the output of postconf, but it is very large and I
don't know how to narrow it down to what is needed to help resolve
this issue.
Try "postconf -n". This should only show settings that are different
from default.
elyograg@bilbo:~$ po
I run a couple of mail servers using postfix, currently at version 2.10.1.
They are set up to send and receive email for multiple virtual domains and have
been doing that beautifully for years.
I recently changed the host name of one of the servers from one domain I am
hosting to another of
Hi all,
I'm running a personal Postfix mail server together with Courier for a
virtual domain setup.
By now I have a domains table with a single transport field which is
used by transport_maps directive in order to know if incoming emails
must be delivered locally or need to be sent to the next ho
Hi,
I have been using Postfix with Dovecot (lmtp/imaps) for a few years now for
5 domains with the virtual domains setup and self-signed certificates using
OpenSSL 1.0.x For spam/virus protection I use Postscreen, Spamassassin and
Clamav; I also use py-spfpolicyd, OpenDmarc, OpenDkim and Clamav
Hi Friends!
I've just installed Mailman 2.1.23 on Debian Stretch, Postfix
3.1.8-0+deb9u1 + Dovecot 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) with "virtual_domains"
"virtual_users" "virtual_aliases" on MySQL, and all seems works fine,
but not tested on production environment again.
I write you for clarification before
On 20.06.18 11:44, Ruben Safir wrote:
The first part is for incoming email. If I get email to a specific
user, c...@newcorp.com , it should be accepted and the MTA should relay
it a user ceo or an alias mysuer. It should reject anything other than
newcorp.com or mrbrklyn.com on the incoming mai
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 12:36 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
>
> I added the domain to mydestinations variable, but this might not be the
> best idea. It lets me pass through the domain and accept it, but it
> doesn't permit me to assign certain users for that domain specifically
http://www.postfix.or
Ruben Safir:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:23:54PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Ruben Safir:
> > > I get this when sending email to the new domain
> > >
> > > 2018-06-20T12:10:14.319765-04:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[13841]: NOQUEUE:
> > > reject: RCPT from l2mail1.panix.com[166.84.1.75]: 454 4.7.1
>
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:23:54PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > I get this when sending email to the new domain
> >
> > 2018-06-20T12:10:14.319765-04:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[13841]: NOQUEUE:
> > reject: RCPT from l2mail1.panix.com[166.84.1.75]: 454 4.7.1
> > : Relay access denied;
Ruben Safir:
> I get this when sending email to the new domain
>
> 2018-06-20T12:10:14.319765-04:00 www2 postfix/smtpd[13841]: NOQUEUE:
> reject: RCPT from l2mail1.panix.com[166.84.1.75]: 454 4.7.1
> : Relay access denied;
> from= to= proto=ESMTP
> helo=
Relay control is specified with smtpd_reci
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:44:23AM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:54:54AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Ruben Safir:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to
> > > be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default. I
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 09:54:54AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Ruben Safir:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to
> > be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default. I have it
> > set up at the moment so that any domain that you try to send
Ruben Safir:
> Hello
>
> I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to
> be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default. I have it
> set up at the moment so that any domain that you try to send though
> get rewritten to the default, mrbrklyn.com. But I'd like this ne
Hello
I have a new domain on my server and I want certain accounts to
be sent out with the new domain, rather than the default. I have it
set up at the moment so that any domain that you try to send though
get rewritten to the default, mrbrklyn.com. But I'd like this new
domain to be allowed th
Thank you for your reply and tips :-)
>
> Your content_filter only applies to MX mail on port 25.
>
Yes I want to use bogofilter only for incoming mails from other mail servers.
It's configured with a global sieve rule to move spam e-mails to Spam folder
for each mailbox. Dovecot is configur
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 05:17:09AM +0300, Christos Chatzaras wrote:
> What I want to do:
>
> I want to disable local delivery for e-mails from virtual domains /
> mailboxes when sender / recipient is on same server. I want these
> e-mails to pass through a relay.
>
> -
> On Apr 14, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Christos Chatzaras wrote:
>
> I think the only way to fix this is to have 2 postfix instances, right? One
> for incoming and one for outgoing.
If you want to round-trip mail through an external SMTP server,
and then bring it back to the same host, then yes, the
More info to make it clearer:
The 'relay denied' I wrote in my previous is not in smtp.example.com logs.
E-mail from u...@example.com to u...@example.com :
--
client (1) --> server1.example.com (2) --> smtp.example.com (3) -->
server1.example.com (4)
--
The 'relay denied' message is on
What I want to do:
I want to disable local delivery for e-mails from virtual domains / mailboxes
when sender / recipient is on same server. I want these e-mails to pass through
a relay.
--
My setup :
I have postfix and dovecot on server1.example.com and smtp.example.com acts as
On 10/26/2017 03:36 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 26.10.17 23:29, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
>
>> it appears to me that Postfix has evolved organically (Read:
>> disorganized) as have many legacy applications like Apache used to be.
>> The documentation you refer to is there alright, but i
On 26 Oct 2017, at 22:55 (-0400), Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
You're wrong of course, Postfix has been designed and implemented
with much care. What we've not done is maintained a free book
along with the software. Postfix comes with "reference
documentation",
and topic-specific tutorials:
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 5:29 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
>
> I am surprised with this sprawl, in the 21st Century. In 30 minutes
> I've figured out and implemented DKIM.
DKIM is comparatively simple, it does just one thing. And yet,
you really should fix your DNS, you may think you h
you dont add all virtual domains to ptr, who are you being misguiden from ? :(
On 26. okt. 2017 21.37.02 cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
On 10/26/2017 12:21 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
the whole fact that mail was SENT by thunderbird has nothing to do
with the
fact that you
> Date: Thursday, October 26, 2017 12:36:37 -0700
> From: cac...@quantum-equities.com
>
> On 10/26/2017 12:21 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
>>> the whole fact that mail was SENT by thunderbird has nothing to do
>>> with the
>>> fact that you need mail server on quantum-equities.com if yo
On 26.10.17 23:29, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
> it appears to me that Postfix has evolved organically (Read:
> disorganized) as have many legacy applications like Apache used to be.
> The documentation you refer to is there alright, but it's all about
> bit-twiddling, nothing about concept
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 16:29, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
> I am surprised with this sprawl, in the 21st Century. In 30 minutes I've
> figured out and implemented DKIM. But it appears to me that Postfix has
> evolved organically (Read: disorganized) as have many legacy applications
>
On 10/26/2017 12:21 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
>> the whole fact that mail was SENT by thunderbird has nothing to do
>> with the
>> fact that you need mail server on quantum-equities.com if you want to
>> RECEIVE mail for quantum-equities.com.
>>
>> configure postfix on quantum-equities
> the whole fact that mail was SENT by thunderbird has nothing to do
> with the
> fact that you need mail server on quantum-equities.com if you want to
> RECEIVE mail for quantum-equities.com.
>
> configure postfix on quantum-equities.com that will have
> "quantum-equities.com" in mydestination.
>
> Date: Thursday, October 26, 2017 20:00:44 +0200
> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>
Here's what delphi-real-estate.com looks like:
www 28800 A 72.251.232.102
@ 28800 MX 10 mail.delphi-real-estate.com.
Do you mean I need to set an A record for delphi-
On 26.10.17 10:32, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
The test email I'm sending from quantum-equities.com to
delphi-real-estate.com, causes the delphi postfix to try and contact
quantum on port 25, for some reason.
this is the reason:
quantum-equities.com. 300 IN MX 0 quantum-
On 26.10.17 09:36, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
Yes I have my smtp server set to mail.delphi-real-estate.com.
Maybe I have it now. I've set my zone file so:
mail 28800 A 72.251.232.102
Is this correct?
On 26.10.17 20:00, Matus UHLAR - f
Here's what delphi-real-estate.com looks like:
www 28800 A 72.251.232.102
@ 28800 MX 10 mail.delphi-real-estate.com.
Do you mean I need to set an A record for delphi-real-estate.com ?
On 10/26/2017 09:18 AM, Richard wrote:
No, you don't need an A-record for delphi-real-estate.
The test email I'm sending from quantum-equities.com to
delphi-real-estate.com, causes the delphi postfix to try and contact
quantum on port 25, for some reason.
Thing is, there is nothing listening there on 25 as the test email was
sent by Thunderbird.
Oct 26 09:06:33 quantum postfix/smtp[1137]:
Thank you Richard.
On 10/26/2017 09:18 AM, Richard wrote:
>
>> Here's what delphi-real-estate.com looks like:
>>
>> www 28800 A 72.251.232.102
>> @ 28800 MX 10 mail.delphi-real-estate.com.
>>
>> Do you mean I need to set an A record for delphi-real-estate.com ?
> No, you don't nee
> Date: Thursday, October 26, 2017 08:40:13 -0700
> From: cac...@quantum-equities.com
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
>
> On 10/25/2017 12:39 PM, Richard wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:55:13 -0700
>>> From: cac...@quantum-equities.com
>>>
>>> Sending an email from a remote
On 10/25/2017 12:39 PM, Richard wrote:
>
>> Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:55:13 -0700
>> From: cac...@quantum-equities.com
>>
>> Sending an email from a remote machine pretends like it goes out
>> just fine. But it never arrives in the server's mail folder.
>> Zero goes into maillog, even
> Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:55:13 -0700
> From: cac...@quantum-equities.com
>
> Sending an email from a remote machine pretends like it goes out
> just fine. But it never arrives in the server's mail folder.
> Zero goes into maillog, even with systemctl restart postfix. TLS
> is no
On 10/24/2017 10:20 AM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
>
> On 10/23/2017 11:55 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> cac...@quantum-equities.com:
>>> On 10/21/2017 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
cac...@quantum-equities.com:
> How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in
>>
On 10/23/2017 11:55 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> cac...@quantum-equities.com:
>> On 10/21/2017 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> cac...@quantum-equities.com:
How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in
my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain,
cac...@quantum-equities.com:
>
> On 10/21/2017 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > cac...@quantum-equities.com:
> >> How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in
> >> my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain,
> >> or where?
> > Normally, someone pays a re
On 10/21/2017 11:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> cac...@quantum-equities.com:
>> How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in
>> my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain,
>> or where?
> Normally, someone pays a registrar, so that the payer can configure
>
cac...@quantum-equities.com:
> How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in
> my registrar, in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain,
> or where?
Normally, someone pays a registrar, so that the payer can configure
the names of DNS servers that hold DNS records for exa
How does DNS know where mail.example1.com is? Should I set it in my registrar,
in the mail system, in Apache as a virtual domain, or where?
In /etc/postfix/virtual ( have
# Redirect system email so it can be picked up
root r...@quantum-equities.com
Will this bypass /var/spool/mail/ro
On 10/20/2017 12:42 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
> Thanks Noel and Rob, I may be on the right track now. Good to know
> I can trust the docs to be current.
>
> So my three domains with 6 users are completely independent of one
> another; no aliasing. Thus I used
> *Non-Postfix mailbox
Thanks Noel and Rob, I may be on the right track now. Good to know I
can trust the docs to be current.
So my three domains with 6 users are completely independent of one
another; no aliasing. Thus I used
*Non-Postfix mailbox store: separate domains, non-UNIX accounts*
In main.cf I set mydomain
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:42:34AM -0700,
cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
> My mail server will receive mail for 3 domains with 6 users, and
> the MUA will be on another machine on The Internets.
That is very small. The simplest choice is to add the second and
third domains to mydestinati
On 10/18/2017 12:42 PM, cac...@quantum-equities.com wrote:
> My mail server will receive mail for 3 domains with 6 users, and the
> MUA will be on another machine on The Internet>
> I'm seeing conflicting info on setting this up. The simplest recipe
> is here:
> https://blog.tinned-software.net/se
My mail server will receive mail for 3 domains with 6 users, and the MUA
will be on another machine on The Internets.
I'm seeing conflicting info on setting this up. The simplest recipe is
here:
https://blog.tinned-software.net/setup-postfix-for-multiple-domains/
... but nothing is mentioned abo
Hi /dev/rob0,
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 10:26 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
>> As an example case, if I send an e-mail from a Hotmail account to
>> an address on my server it then forwards that mail to the user’s
>> GMail e-mail address.
>
> Another example to consider is when spam gets through your lines
Hi Viktor,
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
>> 1. When using Postfix and virtual domain hosting in this fashion, is
>> there any way to pass SPF when mail from a sending account is forwarded
>> to another host (ie: Gmail) ?
>
> This requires SRS, and fairly effective
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:05:07PM -0400, J Doe wrote:
> I have two questions regarding using SPF when I am using Postfix
> with virtual domain hosting.
>
> I currently have an SPF record in my DNS:
>
> example.comTXT“v=spf1 ip4:1.2.3.4/32 ip6:1:2:3::4/128 ?all”
.^no dot? ^
On 17 October 2017 at 03:40, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:05:07PM -0400, J Doe wrote:
>
> > My questions are:
> >
> > 1. When using Postfix and virtual domain hosting in this fashion, is
> > there any way to pass SPF when mail from a sending account is forwarded
> > to ano
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:05:07PM -0400, J Doe wrote:
> My questions are:
>
> 1. When using Postfix and virtual domain hosting in this fashion, is
> there any way to pass SPF when mail from a sending account is forwarded
> to another host (ie: Gmail) ?
This requires SRS, and fairly effective a
I solved this particular problem (forwarding third-party email to google)
using "postsrsd" https://github.com/roehling/postsrsd. SRS (Sender
Rewriting Scheme) rewrites the envelope sender address so that it appears
to be from your domain (allowing SPF to work). This is the scheme used by
forwarders
Hi,
I have two questions regarding using SPF when I am using Postfix with virtual
domain hosting.
I currently have an SPF record in my DNS:
example.comTXT“v=spf1 ip4:1.2.3.4/32 ip6:1:2:3::4/128 ?all”
I virtually host a domain (in this example case, example.com), that is set to
forward
Julian Kippels:
> > You are doing N/2 table lookups to find the table that contains the
> > data. That is, you're doing linear search on top of hashing.
> >
> @Wietse: N/2 is a little pessimistic, but thats only because I know the
> makeup of my mailboxes? 90% of it is in one virtual domain and th
Am Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:17:53 -0400 (EDT)
schrieb wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema):
> Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > > > At which message throughput rate will this make a difference?
> > >
> > > Always. Because you're replacing hashing with linear search.
> >
> > If you compare hashing to linea
Patrick Ben Koetter:
> > > At which message throughput rate will this make a difference?
> >
> > Always. Because you're replacing hashing with linear search.
>
> If you compare hashing to linear search, yes. But I am not sure this is what
> the OPs question was about?
>
> He wrote "would it be f
ias_maps and
> > > > > transport_maps for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each
> > > > > with
> > > > > all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of
> > > > > traffic is for one domain and the rest is
each virtual domain, or have one giant file each with
> > > > all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of
> > > > traffic is for one domain and the rest is split among 32 other domain.
> > >
> > > Hard to tell. If they are static, b
th
> > > all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of
> > > traffic is for one domain and the rest is split among 32 other domain.
> >
> > Hard to tell. If they are static, binary maps Postfix will read them all
> > into
> >
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:32:18AM +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Julian Kippels :
> > would it be faster to have several smaller files for alias_maps and
> > transport_maps for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each with
> > all users domain from all virtua
* Julian Kippels :
> would it be faster to have several smaller files for alias_maps and
> transport_maps for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each with
> all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of
> traffic is for one domain and the rest is sp
Hi,
would it be faster to have several smaller files for alias_maps and
transport_maps for each virtual domain, or have one giant file each with
all users domain from all virtual domains in one file? Around 90% of
traffic is for one domain and the rest is split among 32 other domain.
Thanks
On 24/03/17 00:30, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
That answer was for the port 25 inbound MX relay host, which can be
changed by updating MX records without any interaction with the
users.
[...]
You are conflating MX hosts with MSAs. Users don't configure their
MUAs to talk to MX hosts.
Not quite. In
rtificate
>> selection. And this is not needed. Just point all the virtual domains
>> at a common MX host with a single certificate.
>
> That is not an appropriate answer for my clients who are paying me to
> provide them with their own domain identity at a time when it's al
On 23/03/17 23:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
is it possible to setup separate SSL certificates for an each virtual
domain ?
The Postfix smtpd(8) service does not support SNI-based certificate
selection. And this is not needed. Just point all the virtual domains
at a common MX host with a single
support SNI-based
certificate selection. And this is not needed. Just point all the virtual
domains at a common MX host with a single certificate.
Submission services make for a better use-case of SNI-based certs, but the
supporting code has not yet been written. Here too a shared server works,
pro
Hi,
is it possible to setup separate SSL certificates for an each virtual
domain ?
Thanks in advance for any support.
Cheers
Konrad
ing a single domain
> >> to serving virtual domains? Here's my setup -
> > Hi Danny, did you try:
> >
> > http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html ?
> >
> >> Postfix 3.1.1
> >> Uses Unix system accounts
> >> Dovecot IMAP server
>
On 01/08/2016 3:01 pm, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:31:33PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote:
>> Can someone point me to an easy to understand tutorial on
>> reconfiguring Postfix from serving a single domain to serving
>> virtual domains? Here's my setup
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 12:31:33PM +0100, Danny Horne wrote:
> Can someone point me to an easy to understand tutorial on
> reconfiguring Postfix from serving a single domain to serving
> virtual domains? Here's my setup -
Hi Danny, did you try:
http://www.postfix.org/VIRTU
Hi all,
Can someone point me to an easy to understand tutorial on reconfiguring
Postfix from serving a single domain to serving virtual domains? Here's
my setup -
Postfix 3.1.1
Uses Unix system accounts
Dovecot IMAP server
TLS / DKIM / DMARC used
Probably other stuff I've forgott
On 7/7/2016 8:16 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
Note that your problem at this point has*nothing* to do with
majordomo. Switching to Mailman would not change anything.
I second this. I run both Mailman and Majordomo (on separate servers)
and the Postfix configuration is almost identical.
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:30:33PM +0100, postmas...@quantum-radio.net wrote:
> Getting closer.
But not understanding some basics.
> Now at least using the command line,
>
> echo 'lists' | mail majordomo
See "man mail" to learn how to use your mailx(1) client. Or, better
yet, as below, just s
Getting closer.
Now at least using the command line,
echo 'lists' | mail majordomo
I get this. It is actually looking to deliver it to the command line. =
But not yet...
Jul 7 08:48:21 zeus postfix/pickup[95164]: 2AF4137FD740: uid=3D501 =
from=3D
Jul 7 08:48:21 zeus postfix/cleanup[96311]: 2A
Found the sticky problem. There was a commented out line in “mydestination”
that continued to a second line, and that second line was not commented out.
like this…
#mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain,
mail.$mydomain, www.$mydomain
Fixed, and now on
On 7/6/2016 11:10 AM, postmas...@quantum-radio.net wrote:
@Norton Allen
Thanks for that info. I thought it would do it. And, I was happy to
hear that someone else has actually got it working :-)
I have this now in main.cf
alias_maps=
hash:/etc/aliases
alias_database=
hash:/etc/aliases
All
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo