On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 02:45:06PM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> Confirmed. I had initially copied and pasted it from my Gmail client
> window to my Linux editor. Copying it from the message source instead
> did the trick.
>
> Will this patched version of tls_misc.c be in the final 2.8 release?
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> The patch applies without error here. Be sure not to corrupt the
> file content with some word-wrapping program, or some DOS editor
> that appends control-z.
>
> Wieste
Confirmed. I had initially copied and pasted it from my Gmail c
Steve Jenkins:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Victor Duchovni
> wrote:
> > Sorry, my mistake, when the OpenSSL team removes a work-around from
> > SSL_OP_ALL, we should not remove its name from the list of names Postfix
> > recognizes. It will do no harm.
> >
> > Please apply the following pa
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Victor Duchovni
wrote:
> Sorry, my mistake, when the OpenSSL team removes a work-around from
> SSL_OP_ALL, we should not remove its name from the list of names Postfix
> recognizes. It will do no harm.
>
> Please apply the following patch to 2.8.0-RC[12] or 2.9-20
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:20:16PM -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> I just built and installed Postfix 2.8-RC2 using "make upgrade"
> (upgraded from 2.3.3) and I'm getting the following warning in my
> maillog:
>
> postfix/smtpd[27208]: warning: unknown tls_disable
I just built and installed Postfix 2.8-RC2 using "make upgrade"
(upgraded from 2.3.3) and I'm getting the following warning in my
maillog:
postfix/smtpd[27208]: warning: unknown tls_disable_workarounds value
"CVE-2010-4180" in "CVE-2005-2969 CVE-2010-4180"
I&
