Re: undisclosed-recipients

2018-04-20 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/20/2018 3:30 AM, Karel wrote: > Hello, > > is it legitimate to use "To: undisclosed-recipients", or is to only > (mainly) used by spammers ? It is legit. I don't see many spammers using this anymore, probably because of the incorrect perception that it indicate

Re: undisclosed-recipients

2018-04-20 Thread Doug Hardie
> On 20 April 2018, at 01:30, Karel wrote: > > Hello, > > is it legitimate to use "To: undisclosed-recipients", or is to only > (mainly) used by spammers ? > > Seems to me, if I get an email, I should also know who else was the > email sent to. > Its lik

undisclosed-recipients

2018-04-20 Thread Karel
Hello, is it legitimate to use "To: undisclosed-recipients", or is to only (mainly) used by spammers ? Seems to me, if I get an email, I should also know who else was the email sent to. Its like having a conference call and you don't know who's participating. If I wanted to

Re: reject mail to undisclosed recipients and with "our" addresses in From:

2011-07-13 Thread Stan Hoeppner
e monitor) - >>> >>> - all mail sent to undisclosed recipients You could use header_checks and a PCRE to reject or redirect all such mail addressed to "undisclosed recipients", but given how often this is used legitimately, I don't think it wise to filter on this criteria alo

Re: reject mail to undisclosed recipients and with "our" addresses in From:

2011-07-13 Thread mouss
Le 13/07/2011 18:22, Reindl Harald a écrit : > > > Am 13.07.2011 17:07, schrieb Victor Duchovni: >>> - all mail sent with "our" addresses in From: but not originating from >>> us (or mail server is in-house, one server with one IP) >> >> This would be a mistake. For example, you'd never see your

Re: reject mail to undisclosed recipients and with "our" addresses in From:

2011-07-13 Thread Drizzt
unt we monitor) - > >> > >> - all mail sent to undisclosed recipients > > > > Why not focus on spam, rather than weakly correlated factors. It is probably > > best to deploy a decent spam filter. > > We have Spamassassin. > > But I thought t

Re: reject mail to undisclosed recipients and with "our" addresses in From:

2011-07-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.07.2011 17:07, schrieb Victor Duchovni: >> - all mail sent with "our" addresses in From: but not originating from >> us (or mail server is in-house, one server with one IP) > > This would be a mistake. For example, you'd never see your own posts to > this list you missed that the envelope

Re: reject mail to undisclosed recipients and with "our" addresses in From:

2011-07-13 Thread Geert Mak
On 13.07.2011, at 17:07, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Geert Mak wrote: > >> is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher >> account we monitor) - >> >> - all mail sent to undisclosed recipients >

Re: reject mail to undisclosed recipients and with "our" addresses in From:

2011-07-13 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Geert Mak wrote: > is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher account > we monitor) - > > - all mail sent to undisclosed recipients Why not focus on spam, rather than weakly correlated factors. It is probably best

reject mail to undisclosed recipients and with "our" addresses in From:

2011-07-13 Thread Geert Mak
Hello, is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher account we monitor) - - all mail sent to undisclosed recipients - all mail sent with "our" addresses in From: but not originating from us (or mail server is in-house, one server with one IP) For the sec