--On Sunday, August 10, 2008 2:31 PM +1000 James Brown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Quanah.
I am using Mac OS X 10.4.11 for my Postfix and Courier-Auth server.
I'm often running out of resources, despite changing things based on many
google searches!
I do not have either of the files yo
Thanks Quanah.
I am using Mac OS X 10.4.11 for my Postfix and Courier-Auth server.
I'm often running out of resources, despite changing things based on
many google searches!
I do not have either of the files you mention. Should I simply create
them?
Thanks,
James.
On 10/08/2008, at 4:5
--On Saturday, August 09, 2008 8:27 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To help other people who run into this same system-specific gotcha,
would you share the solution with the mailing list? I really can't
explore the gory kernel details of every system myself.
Certainly! :)
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
> > servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if tables are not
> > carefully defined to have identic
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if tables are not
carefully defined to have identical values for connection-related
para
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:22:54PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> that said, I don't think this is important. I personally use things like
>
> maps_directory = ${config_directory}/maps
> cdb_prefis = cdb:${maps_directory}/db
> pcre_prefix = pcre:${maps_directory}/pcre
> sql_repfix = proxy:mysql:${maps_dir
Wietse Venema wrote:
mouss:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
[snip]
Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
a question here. is there a reason why proxymap wouldn't be the default
(so people
mouss:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > [snip]
> > Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
> >
> > Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
> >
> > Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
> >
>
> a question here. is there a reason why proxymap wouldn't be the defaul
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:48:51PM +0200, mouss wrote:
> Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >[snip]
> >Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
> >
> >Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
> >
> >Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
>
> a question here. is there a rea
Victor Duchovni wrote:
[snip]
Listen carefully when Wietse and I recommend "proxymap".
Step 1: migrate to "proxy:ldap:" tables
Step 2: debug any problems that remain after Step 1.
a question here. is there a reason why proxymap wouldn't be the default
(so people would have to exclude maps i
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:12 PM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:50:35AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix run
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:50:35AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
> >servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if table
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:57 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your mental model of this is flawed. Postfix runs hundreds of cleanup
servers, hundreds of smtpd servers, further-more, if tables are not
carefully defined to have identical values for connection-related
para
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:29:27AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:35 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >
> >>We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, an
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:39 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> >> --On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:02 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > We found that if we are using startTLS with pos
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
> postfix, that it Postfix stops working, even though the LDAP server
> continues to accept connections from other clients just fine using
> startTLS. He
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:35 AM -0400 Victor Duchovni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:02:48PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
postfix, that it Postfix stops working, even though the LDAP server
--On Thursday, July 24, 2008 6:39 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
--On Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:02 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We found that if we are using startTLS with postfix, and heavily load
> postfix, that it Postf
18 matches
Mail list logo
