On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:27:12 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
>> wrote:
>> > Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
>> > version of everything.
>> >
>> >Wietse
>> >
>> > *** ./
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
> wrote:
> > Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
> > version of everything.
> >
> > Wietse
> >
> > *** ./dict_sqlite.c-Fri Jun 18 20:19:15 2010
> > --- ./dict_sqlite.c Th
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every
> version of everything.
>
> Wietse
>
> *** ./dict_sqlite.c- Fri Jun 18 20:19:15 2010
> --- ./dict_sqlite.c Thu Sep 9 11:01:12 2010
> ***
> ***
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:06:07 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> > If you want Postfix to support the obsolete API then you
>> > cannot remove support for the preferred API.
>>
>> Sorry for delay with answer. I'll send this diff as workaround. Because
>> I'm not a prog
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> > If you want Postfix to support the obsolete API then you
> > cannot remove support for the preferred API.
>
> Sorry for delay with answer. I'll send this diff as workaround. Because
> I'm not a programmer/coder. Probably correct decision is using some another
> ifdefs
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:43:56 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
>> wrote:
>> > subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On 8/2/2010 5:18
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
> wrote:
> > subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> >> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
> >> >> I use postfix with sqlite p
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
>> wrote:
>> > On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
>> >> I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
>>
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:36:35 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema
wrote:
> subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
>> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
>> wrote:
>> > On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
>> >> I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
>>
subscri...@viliar.net.ru:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
> wrote:
> > On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
> >> I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
> function
> >> name. I
> >> suggest to make something like this for pos
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:02:41 -0400, Brian Evans - Postfix List
wrote:
> On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
>> I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to
function
>> name. I
>> suggest to make something like this for postfix 2.8. Or maybe check
>> sqlite
>> ve
On 8/2/2010 5:18 AM, subscri...@viliar.net.ru wrote:
I use postfix with sqlite patch about 2 years with small fix to function
name. I
suggest to make something like this for postfix 2.8. Or maybe check sqlite
version at compile time and use ifdef's.
You might like this from the archives...
ht
(Looks like my previous letters has been failed to deliver. so I resend
it)
Due version of sqlite in CentOS5 last snapshots 20100618 and alter does
not compile
with next error:
dict_sqlite.c:71:2: error: #error "Your SQLite version is too old"
dict_sqlite.c: In function 'dict_sqlite_lookup':
dict
13 matches
Mail list logo
