subscri...@viliar.net.ru: > > If you want Postfix to support the obsolete API then you > > cannot remove support for the preferred API. > > Sorry for delay with answer. I'll send this diff as workaround. Because > I'm not a programmer/coder. Probably correct decision is using some another > ifdefs here. > > P.S. For me it's not a problem to live with own patched postfix as I do > now. But the way you integrate sqlite support in postfix - is a 'kick off' > CentOS 5 users from using postfix 2.8. It wouldn't compile anymore and I > don't think is good. How much people will search&patch&compile postfix on > their own? > P.S2. It's not about flame.
Will this work? Unfortunately I can't test Postfix myself on every version of everything. Wietse *** ./dict_sqlite.c- Fri Jun 18 20:19:15 2010 --- ./dict_sqlite.c Thu Sep 9 11:01:12 2010 *************** *** 68,74 **** #include <sqlite3.h> #if !defined(SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER) || (SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER < 3005004) ! #error "Your SQLite version is too old" #endif /* Utility library. */ --- 68,74 ---- #include <sqlite3.h> #if !defined(SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER) || (SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER < 3005004) ! #define sqlite3_prepare_v2 sqlite3_prepare #endif /* Utility library. */