Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-02 Thread Glenn English
e of the DMZ, as I understand it. This suggestion was to run an SMTP reverse proxy on the firewall. I'm thinking about maybe doing that for HTTP because it'd be pretty easy to filter based on what would be legit HTML requests, but not for much else. Thanks for the info... -- Glenn English g...@slsware.com

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-02 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:15:29PM -0600, Glenn English wrote: > > So why must this be a Postfix-as-proxy, instead of a complete > > Postfix-with-queue instance? > > Like I said, I'm not at all sure it does. But I'm told that there > should be an SMTP reverse p

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Wietse Venema
Glenn English: > > On Apr 1, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > So why must this be a Postfix-as-proxy, instead of a complete > > Postfix-with-queue instance? > > Like I said, I'm not at all sure it does. But I'm told that there > should

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Glenn English
On Apr 1, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > So why must this be a Postfix-as-proxy, instead of a complete > Postfix-with-queue instance? Like I said, I'm not at all sure it does. But I'm told that there should be an SMTP reverse proxy running on the firewall to protect

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Glenn English
On Apr 1, 2010, at 7:33 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > If you want all the edge security managed by one device I don't. There's a border router with ACLs, and everybody has a reasonably intelligent packet filter. I'm just trying for this one fairly fancy box in the middle for inspection and routin

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Glenn English put forth on 4/1/2010 5:42 PM: > I was asking about Postfix running as a daemon on the firewall computer that > handles routing and inspecting traffic between the WAN, the DMZ, and the LAN. > This Postfix would intercept and inspect incoming SMTP connections (and drop > some) befo

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Wietse Venema
Glenn English: > > On Apr 1, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > > Were you asking about using Postfix as a proxy in front of internal SMTP > > servers, or using firewall reverse-proxy SMTP support to sit in front of > > Postfix? > > I was asking abo

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Glenn English
On Apr 1, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > Were you asking about using Postfix as a proxy in front of internal SMTP > servers, or using firewall reverse-proxy SMTP support to sit in front of > Postfix? I was asking about Postfix running as a daemon on the firewall comp

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:52:46PM -0600, Glenn English wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > > What is the "it" that has to be done for "security reasons". > > Reverse proxy-ing servers on the firewall. The idea, as I

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Glenn English
On Apr 1, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > What is the "it" that has to be done for "security reasons". Reverse proxy-ing servers on the firewall. The idea, as I understand it, is to keep badness from getting to the servers. I can kinda understand that for HT

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:50:04PM -0600, Glenn English wrote: > > On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > > >> Is it possible to use postfix as a reverse proxy for my SMTP server? > > > > Yes, but why? > > Because I was told over on the

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Glenn English
On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: >> Is it possible to use postfix as a reverse proxy for my SMTP server? > > Yes, but why? Because I was told over on the mailop list that it needs to be done for security reasons, and I'm looking into whether to believe it o

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:49:50AM -0600, Glenn English wrote: > Is it possible to use postfix as a reverse proxy for my SMTP server? Yes, but why? > I think what I'm asking is does postfix do its UBE and protocol checks > *before* it sends to a smarthost. Yes, but when Post

Re: reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/1/2010 12:49 PM, Glenn English wrote: Is it possible to use postfix as a reverse proxy for my SMTP server? I think what I'm asking is does postfix do its UBE and protocol checks *before* it sends to a smarthost. If not, do you know of a way to reverse proxy SMTP? How about POP3 and

reverse proxy

2010-04-01 Thread Glenn English
Is it possible to use postfix as a reverse proxy for my SMTP server? I think what I'm asking is does postfix do its UBE and protocol checks *before* it sends to a smarthost. If not, do you know of a way to reverse proxy SMTP? How about POP3 and IMAP? -- Glenn English g...@slsware.com