On Apr 1, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > So why must this be a Postfix-as-proxy, instead of a complete > Postfix-with-queue instance?
Like I said, I'm not at all sure it does. But I'm told that there should be an SMTP reverse proxy running on the firewall to protect the full server from "delivery attempts to never-existed addresses (with a subclass for never-existed addresses that match the format(s) of your generated Message-IDs), attempts to use VRFY and EXPN, attempts to use RCPT that are aborted (likely indicate spam-supporting abusers doing external SAV), and so on". Just trying to decide whether I want to do it, and I think I've been convinced on this list that I don't. Thanks all... -- Glenn English g...@slsware.com
