On 7/13/2011 10:51 AM, Geert Mak wrote:
>
> On 13.07.2011, at 17:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
>>
>>> is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher
>>> account we monitor) -
>>>
>>> - all mail sent to undisclose
Le 13/07/2011 18:22, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>
>
> Am 13.07.2011 17:07, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
>>> - all mail sent with "our" addresses in From: but not originating from
>>> us (or mail server is in-house, one server with one IP)
>>
>> This would be a mistake. For example, you'd never see your
On 2011-07-13 17:51:40 (+0200), Geert Mak wrote:
>
> On 13.07.2011, at 17:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
> >
> >> is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher
> >> account we monitor) -
> >>
> >> - all mail
Am 13.07.2011 17:07, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
>> - all mail sent with "our" addresses in From: but not originating from
>> us (or mail server is in-house, one server with one IP)
>
> This would be a mistake. For example, you'd never see your own posts to
> this list
you missed that the envelope
On 13.07.2011, at 17:07, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
>
>> is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher
>> account we monitor) -
>>
>> - all mail sent to undisclosed recipients
>
> Why not focus on spam, rather th
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Geert Mak wrote:
> is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher account
> we monitor) -
>
> - all mail sent to undisclosed recipients
Why not focus on spam, rather than weakly correlated factors. It is probably
best to deploy a
Hello,
is it possible to reject/redirect on postfix level (to a spam catcher account
we monitor) -
- all mail sent to undisclosed recipients
- all mail sent with "our" addresses in From: but not originating from us (or
mail server is in-house, one server with one IP)
For the second case I rea