Re: received date differs

2009-06-02 Thread Simon Waters
The date inside the mail (on the "Date:" header) was for February. Since spam is junk there is no reason to expect this date to be valid, spammers frequently use future or past dates to end up at the top or the bottom of the in tray and thus more prominent and more likely to be read. Sometimes

Re: received date differs

2009-06-02 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* K bharathan : > i find myself dumb on this > appreciate an explanation "Date:" is just a header - meaning the user can specify it, just like "To:", "Subject:" or "Cc:". It need not be correct. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 http:

Re: received date differs

2009-06-02 Thread K bharathan
i find myself dumb on this appreciate an explanation On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt < ralf.hildebra...@charite.de> wrote: > * K bharathan : > > the attached is a header of a spam mail; i found the dates are different > and > > delivered today; but inbox date shows 13/02/2009

Re: received date differs

2009-06-02 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* K bharathan : > the attached is a header of a spam mail; i found the dates are different and > delivered today; but inbox date shows 13/02/2009; > what could have gone wrong? Nothing. > Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:48:52 - (GMT) -- Ralf Hildebrandt Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung

received date differs

2009-06-02 Thread K bharathan
the attached is a header of a spam mail; i found the dates are different and delivered today; but inbox date shows 13/02/2009; what could have gone wrong? Return-path: Received: from relay1.xxx.xx by xxx.xx (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.3.R) with ESMTP id md50004123477.msg for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2009