Mark Martinec writes:
> On Sunday August 23 2009 04:10:06 Dave Täht wrote:
>> What I found after fighting with an exchange server that what seems to
>> work best is assigning my first mx host to be ipv6 only, and my fallback
>> to be a mx ipv6 and ipv4 host.
>
> My choice is to have the first MX
On Sunday August 23 2009 04:10:06 Dave Täht wrote:
> What I found after fighting with an exchange server that what seems to
> work best is assigning my first mx host to be ipv6 only, and my fallback
> to be a mx ipv6 and ipv4 host.
My choice is to have the first MX have both the IPv6 and IPv4 addr
* /dev/rob0 :
> On Friday 21 August 2009 00:23:07 Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > > > This is a difficult question.
> > >
> > > I disagree.
> >
> > Just that because you disagree makes the question not simple :)
>
> Perhaps you didn't understand. I tried to explain why the choice of
> pre-DATA reject_rb
mouss writes:
> Dave a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
>> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
>> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
>> disable that and activa
On Friday 21 August 2009 00:23:07 Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > > This is a difficult question.
> >
> > I disagree.
>
> Just that because you disagree makes the question not simple :)
Perhaps you didn't understand. I tried to explain why the choice of
pre-DATA reject_rbl_client lookups should be prefe
Olivier Nicole a écrit :
> Hi Dave,
>
>> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
>> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
>> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
>> disable that and activate t
Dave a écrit :
> Hello,
> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
> disable that and activate them in spamassassi
> > This is a difficult question.
> I disagree.
Just that because you disagree makes the question not simple :)
> 2. Gmail is not squeaky clean, it's no surprise that they end up in
Of course, but then it gets people complaining why they cannot receive
mails from gmail.
> 5. A reject_rbl_clien
On Thursday 20 August 2009 22:56:31 Olivier Nicole wrote:
> > I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
> > postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have
> > some rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or
> > should i disab
Hi Dave,
> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
> disable that and activate them in spamassassin? Suggestions
Hello,
I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my
postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some
rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best place for them or should i
disable that and activate them in spamassassin? Suggestions welcome.
11 matches
Mail list logo
