On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:04:21AM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> But I'd still be interested in seeing some example postscreen
> configs actually in use right now, by you and anyone else
> willing to share...
I have posted mine here in the past, I think on or around 2011-02-15.
It hasn't changed
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:04:21 -0500, Charles Marcus
wrote:
> But I'd still be interested in seeing some example postscreen configs
> actually in use right now, by you and anyone else willing to share...
This works pretty well:
as root:
## configure Postfix to use postscreen
sed -i 's/^smtp .*s
On 1/15/2012 10:04 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2012-01-14 5:55 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> On 1/14/2012 6:43 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>> Also, Stan - would would be interested in seeing some comparisons of
>>> postscreen configurations. I haven't implemented it yet (we use an
>>> outsourced a
On 2012-01-14 5:55 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 1/14/2012 6:43 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Also, Stan - would would be interested in seeing some comparisons of
postscreen configurations. I haven't implemented it yet (we use an
outsourced anti-spam service currently), but am interested in trying it
On 2012-01-15 6:21 AM, Steve wrote:
For me the question is: What does this outsourced anti-spam solution
do? Does it block (aka: what postscreen/fqrdns.pcre does) and/or does
it tag spam/ham. What other services do they offer that you need/use
(qurantine management, anti virus, black-/whitelisti
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:55:46 -0600
> Von: Stan Hoeppner
> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Betreff: Re: postscreen supersedes fqrdns.pcre table
> On 1/14/2012 6:43 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>
> > Also, Stan - would would be i
On 1/14/2012 6:43 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
> Also, Stan - would would be interested in seeing some comparisons of
> postscreen configurations. I haven't implemented it yet (we use an
> outsourced anti-spam service currently), but am interested in trying it
> out to see if we can lose that service
On 2012-01-13 6:18 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
As fqrdns.pcre has been a topic recently, I feel this needs to be stated
again, for those of you who have missed previous threads on this topic.
1. Postscreen rejects most bots BEFORE they reach smtpd processes
(fqrdns.pcre is evaluated by smtpd
As fqrdns.pcre has been a topic recently, I feel this needs to be stated
again, for those of you who have missed previous threads on this topic.
1. Postscreen rejects most bots BEFORE they reach smtpd processes
(fqrdns.pcre is evaluated by smtpd)
2. AFAIK postscreen never FP's
3. postscreen
