-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:55:46 -0600 > Von: Stan Hoeppner <s...@hardwarefreak.com> > An: postfix-users@postfix.org > Betreff: Re: postscreen supersedes fqrdns.pcre table
> On 1/14/2012 6:43 AM, Charles Marcus wrote: > > > Also, Stan - would would be interested in seeing some comparisons of > > postscreen configurations. I haven't implemented it yet (we use an > > outsourced anti-spam service currently), but am interested in trying it > > out to see if we can lose that service permanently now. > > Neither is a complete antispam solution. You'll need a lot more special > sauce in a local AS recipe before you'd want to wholesale switch from > the managed service. > For me the question is: What does this outsourced anti-spam solution do? Does it block (aka: what postscreen/fqrdns.pcre does) and/or does it tag spam/ham. What other services do they offer that you need/use (qurantine management, anti virus, black-/whitelisting, dnsbl/rhbl, spf, graylisting, dkim, domain keys, sender id, reporting, throtteling, per user or per domain settings, inbound/outbound controls, etc, etc, etc)? IMHO getting spam volume down to less than 5% of the inbound with practically 0% false positive/negativ is today very easy and does not require you much effort (if at all). > -- > Stan -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
