> I'm going to disagree, slightly, with Stan and Wietse. The DNSBL
> scoring feature was formerly only available via a policy service, and
> it seems to have improved my spam blocking somewhat. I have aggressive
> DNSBLs, which I'd never trust for reject_rbl_client, set with low
> scores.
Yeah
- Original Message -
> From: /dev/rob0
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 8:24 AM
> Subject: Re: postscreen stats
> I'm going to disagree, slightly, with Stan and Wietse. The DNSBL
> scoring feature was formerly only avai
On Tuesday 23 August 2011 14:25:32 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
> > On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kov?cs J?nos wrote:
> > > Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a
> > > good RBL can catch. Do you have any data on how many spam
> > > emails survived postscreen?
> >
> > Ove
Let me share my own stats: I configured only the pregreet test (no rbl, no deep
protocol test),
and applied selective greylisting (affecting only smtp hosts with a PTR record
resembling to
a dialup/cable/dsl/... client hostname) after postscreen.
I found that postscreen blocked 15% of the zombie
* Stan Hoeppner :
> On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kovács János wrote:
> > Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL
> > can catch.
> > Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?
>
> Overall, Postscreen is no better nor worse at stopping spam than what
Zitat von Patrick Ben Koetter :
* Wietse Venema :
Stan Hoeppner:
> On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kov?cs J?nos wrote:
> > Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a
good RBL can catch.
> > Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?
>
> Overall, Postscreen i
Am 23.08.2011 21:33, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Wietse Venema :
>> Stan Hoeppner:
>>> On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kov?cs J?nos wrote:
Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL
can catch.
Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?
- Original Message -
> From: Patrick Ben Koetter
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 9:33 AM
> Subject: Re: postscreen stats
>
> I disabled greylisting since I started using postscreen and the spam ratio did
> not increase, bu
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Homer Parker wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 21:33 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> I disabled greylisting since I started using postscreen and the spam
>> ratio did
>> not increase, but the immediacy at which mails from new senders arrive
>> did.
>>
>> Anyone w
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 21:33 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> I disabled greylisting since I started using postscreen and the spam
> ratio did
> not increase, but the immediacy at which mails from new senders arrive
> did.
>
> Anyone with similiar observations?
That's what I've seen. I
Stan Hoeppner:
> > Agreed. Postscreen's main goal is to reduce mail server load, so
> > that you can postpone that forklift upgrade.
> >
> > Postscreen also stops a few percent of spambots that popular DNSBLs
> > miss, but at this time, that is only a minor benefit.
>
> I would think the proper m
On 8/23/2011 2:25 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner:
>> On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kov?cs J?nos wrote:
>>> Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL
>>> can catch.
>>> Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?
>>
>> Overall, Postscreen is no
* Wietse Venema :
> Stan Hoeppner:
> > On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kov?cs J?nos wrote:
> > > Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL
> > > can catch.
> > > Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?
> >
> > Overall, Postscreen is no better nor wor
Stan Hoeppner:
> On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kov?cs J?nos wrote:
> > Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL
> > can catch.
> > Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?
>
> Overall, Postscreen is no better nor worse at stopping spam than what
>
On 8/23/2011 9:10 AM, Kovács János wrote:
> Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL can
> catch.
> Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?
Overall, Postscreen is no better nor worse at stopping spam than what
we've all been doing via SMTP
Thanks Ralf! It's amazing how much spam the pregreet test and a good RBL can
catch.
Do you have any data on how many spam emails survived postscreen?
Kovacs Janos
* Kovács János :
> Dear postfix-users,
>
> I'm preparing for a presentation, and I'd like to include some statistics
> about postscreen. If you use this feature, could you please share it with me?
> Eg. it would be nice to include the blocked / total inbound emails % ratio,
> or any other data y
Dear postfix-users,
I'm preparing for a presentation, and I'd like to include some statistics about
postscreen. If you use this feature, could you please share it with me?
Eg. it would be nice to include the blocked / total inbound emails % ratio, or
any other data you think that can be relevant
18 matches
Mail list logo
