Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 8/3/2011 2:56 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > >> If I set >> >> virtual_transport = dovecot >> >> outbound emails are always deferred. > > I gave you the correct fix for this a few days ago: 587 submission. I will try in few days. Thanks ag

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:56:35 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:34:54 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >>> transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_vir

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On 8/3/2011 9:04 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:19:10 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> On 8/3/2011 2:56 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >> >>> If I set >>> >>> virtual_transport = dovecot >>> >>> outbound emails are always deferred. >> >> I gave you the correct fix for this a few days

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:19:10 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: On 8/3/2011 2:56 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: If I set virtual_transport = dovecot outbound emails are always deferred. I gave you the correct fix for this a few days ago: 587 submission. and note that outbound mails is not handled b

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 09:56:35 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:34:54 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1 virtual_transpor

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On 8/3/2011 2:56 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > If I set > > virtual_transport = dovecot > > outbound emails are always deferred. I gave you the correct fix for this a few days ago: 587 submission. -- Stan

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:34:54 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > >> transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf >> maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1 >> virtual_transport = virtual > > doh :-) > > virtual is postfix that

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:20:40PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > >> Without transport_maps it doesn't works. If I set virtual_transport = >> dovecot log returns relay=none >> >>> >> >>> The "virtual_transport" setting only app

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 23:34:54 +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1 virtual_transport = virtual doh :-) virtual is postfix that do not do sieve, it must be dovecot and be added to master.cf as suc

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:20:40PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > Without transport_maps it doesn't works. If I set virtual_transport = > dovecot log returns relay=none > >>> > >>> The "virtual_transport" setting only applies to domains that are listed > >>> in virtual_mailbox_domains.

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

Saturday, July 30, 2011, 8:11:17 AM, I wrote: > Saturday, July 30, 2011, 3:23:30 AM, Andrea wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >>> > This is not difficult, as long as you don't override

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

Saturday, July 30, 2011, 3:23:30 AM, Andrea wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni > wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >> >>> > This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default >>> > behaviour with silly transport_

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 7/30/2011 3:23 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >>> > This is not difficult, as long as you don't overrid

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On 7/30/2011 3:23 AM, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni > wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >> This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default behaviour with silly transport_maps tha

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On 7/30/2011 2:27 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > 587 inet n - n - - smtpd > -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes > -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes > -o smtpd_client_restrictions= > -o smtpd_helo_restrictions= > -o smtpd_sender_restrictions= > -

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 7/29/2011 4:40 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >> This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default behaviour with silly transport_maps that don'

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > >> > This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default >> > behaviour with silly transport_maps that don't work. >> >> Without transport_maps it doesn'

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On 7/29/2011 4:40 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > >>> This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default >>> behaviour with silly transport_maps that don't work. >> >> Without transport_maps it doesn't works. If I

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:34:54PM +0200, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: > > This is not difficult, as long as you don't override postfix' default > > behaviour with silly transport_maps that don't work. > > Without transport_maps it doesn't works. If I set virtual_transport = > dovecot log returns rela

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 2011-07-29 21:20, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jeroen Geilman  wrote: >>> >>> On 2011-07-29 18:37, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: my outbound traffic try to authenticate recipients and delivery fails

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On 2011-07-29 21:20, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: On 2011-07-29 18:37, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: my outbound traffic try to authenticate recipients and delivery fails My god, why is this so complicated ? You're adding extra transport maps to a

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 2011-07-29 18:37, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: >> my outbound traffic try to authenticate recipients and delivery fails > My god, why is this so complicated ? > > You're adding extra transport maps to a transport that is already the > default

Re: misunderstanding with dovecot

On 2011-07-29 18:37, Andrea Ganduglia wrote: Hi. I have a little issue with postfix and dovecot. Below you can find my actual configuration, this works well if I use virtual_transport = virtual but if I add those lines: transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf maildrop_dest

misunderstanding with dovecot

Hi. I have a little issue with postfix and dovecot. Below you can find my actual configuration, this works well if I use virtual_transport = virtual but if I add those lines: transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_transport.cf maildrop_destination_recipient_limit = 1 virtual_transport =