Demi Marie Obenour wrote in
<6baaf997-0462-f5de-402b-c77f01ff5...@gmail.com>:
|On 12/2/22 08:08, David Dolan wrote:
|> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 10:33, David Dolan wrote:
|>> Subject:Re: helo command rejected
|>>> From: Viktor Dukhovni
|>>>
On 12/2/22 08:08, David Dolan wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 10:33, David Dolan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: helo command rejected
>>> From: Viktor Dukhovni
>>> Date: 2022-12-01 16:56:13
>>> Message-ID: Y4jcrRxsEJPsWZVZ () straasha ! imrryr ! o
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 09:47:03AM -0500, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> raf:
> > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema
> > wrote:
> >
> > > David Dolan:
> > > > I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate OS
> > > > to
> > > > get past this issue?
> > >
>
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20221202180252.bmzqg%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Viktor Dukhovni wrote in
| :
||On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
||> Simply add a dnsmasq local cache. dnsmasq is a package on
...
||Deploying dnsmasq does not do anything to address the li
Viktor Dukhovni wrote in
:
|On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|
|> Simply add a dnsmasq local cache. dnsmasq is a package on
|> AlpineLinux, i use it. (Including dnssec, and it even serves its
|> cache back into a VPN, so that effectively only one instance do
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Simply add a dnsmasq local cache. dnsmasq is a package on
> AlpineLinux, i use it. (Including dnssec, and it even serves its
> cache back into a VPN, so that effectively only one instance does
> all the web queries.) (I use it
Felker has past history with this mailing list and postfix, as well as
some things related to annoyances like versioning.
Are you on a MUSL libc system? IIRC there's no support for TCP in
MUSL's stub resolver. See, for example:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28312935
https://news
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4nnwkv4frxzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|raf:
|> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema e.org> wrote:
|>
|>> David Dolan:
|>>> I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate \
|>>> OS to
|>>> get past this issue?
|>>
|>> Yes.
David Dolan:
> I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate OS to
> get past this issue?
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema
wrote:
Yes. Don't use toy software in production.
On 03.12.22 00:59, raf wrote:
I suspect that alpine is used in many ma
raf:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema
> wrote:
>
> > David Dolan:
> > > I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate OS to
> > > get past this issue?
> >
> > Yes. Don't use toy software in production.
> >
> > Wietse
>
> I suspect that alpin
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:51:14AM -0500, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> David Dolan:
> > I guess it's using the musl resolver in Alpine so we need to migrate OS to
> > get past this issue?
>
> Yes. Don't use toy software in production.
>
> Wietse
I suspect that alpine is used in many many
dock
David Dolan:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 10:33, David Dolan wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Subject:Re: helo command rejected
> >> From: Viktor Dukhovni
> >> Date: 2022-12-01 16:56:13
> >> Message-ID: Y4jcrRxsEJPsWZVZ () straasha ! imrryr ! o
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 10:33, David Dolan wrote:
>
>
> Subject: Re: helo command rejected
>> From: Viktor Dukhovni
>> Date: 2022-12-01 16:56:13
>> Message-ID: Y4jcrRxsEJPsWZVZ () straasha ! imrryr ! org
>> [Download RAW message or body]
>>
Subject:Re: helo command rejected
> From: Viktor Dukhovni
> Date: 2022-12-01 16:56:13
> Message-ID: Y4jcrRxsEJPsWZVZ () straasha ! imrryr ! org
> [Download RAW message or body]
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:06:30PM +, David Dolan wrote:
>
>
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 16:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> >> On 01.12.22 15:23, David Dolan wrote:
> >> >We have two customers who we're unable to receive email from.
> >> >It's failing the helo lookup as it can't resolve the hostname in the
&
On 01.12.22 15:23, David Dolan wrote:
>We have two customers who we're unable to receive email from.
>It's failing the helo lookup as it can't resolve the hostname in the helo
>message.
>Helo command rejected: Host not found;
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 15:49, Matus UHL
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 04:06:30PM +, David Dolan wrote:
> This is the full line:
>
> NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[103.246.251.109]:
> 450 4.7.1 :
> Helo command rejected: Host not found;
> from=<#> to=<#>
> proto=ESMTP he
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 15:49, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 01.12.22 15:23, David Dolan wrote:
> >We have two customers who we're unable to receive email from.
> >It's failing the helo lookup as it can't resolve the hostname in the helo
> >message.
>
On 01.12.22 15:23, David Dolan wrote:
We have two customers who we're unable to receive email from.
It's failing the helo lookup as it can't resolve the hostname in the helo
message.
Helo command rejected: Host not found;
The issued hostname is logged just prior to this text.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 03:23:52PM +, David Dolan wrote:
> We have two customers who we're unable to receive email from. It's
> failing the helo lookup as it can't resolve the hostname in the helo
> message. Helo command rejected: Host not found;
Not surprisin
David Dolan skrev den 2022-12-01 16:23:
Has anybody come across this before and any idea how to resolve it?
32 ips with one single helo name ?
solution is 32 ips with not a single helo name
Hi All,
We have two customers who we're unable to receive email from.
It's failing the helo lookup as it can't resolve the hostname in the helo
message.
Helo command rejected: Host not found;
The postfix configuration for helo checks is as follows. It's failing on
reject_u
t then SMTP) port 465.
> InvalidRecipientsException: Invalid recipients were provided for the
> message: 'more...@cerm.unifi.it' (450 4.7.1
> : Helo command rejected:
> Host not found
>
> Is there a way to put *outlook.com in a "white list"?
Wrong question.
I'm trying to configure my outlook account to send email through my
mail server, but I receive the following error:
InvalidRecipientsException: Invalid recipients were provided for the
message: 'more...@cerm.unifi.it' (450 4.7.1
: Helo command rejected:
Host not found
Is the
On 10/13/2015 1:01 AM, Christian Kivalo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-10-13 05:22, Richard B. Pyne wrote:
>> I am running postfix 2.10.1, dovecot 2.2.10, with postfixadmin and
>> maia mailguard.
>>
>> I am trying to figure out how to disable the HELO/EHLO
>> reject_non_fqdn_hostname on the submission p
Hi,
On 2015-10-13 05:22, Richard B. Pyne wrote:
I am running postfix 2.10.1, dovecot 2.2.10, with postfixadmin and
maia mailguard.
I am trying to figure out how to disable the HELO/EHLO
reject_non_fqdn_hostname on the submission port since many (most)
desktop and laptop clients don't send it.
I am running postfix 2.10.1, dovecot 2.2.10, with postfixadmin and maia
mailguard.
I am trying to figure out how to disable the HELO/EHLO
reject_non_fqdn_hostname on the submission port since many (most)
desktop and laptop clients don't send it.
I want to keep the restriction on port 25
Tha
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:48:21PM -0400, Simon Brereton wrote:
> I have a line like this in my logs:
> mail #554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Host not
> found ##
>
> This is clearly because I have reject_invalid_helo_name in my
> main.cf
No. You are confusing "inva
On Aug 16, 2012 1:24 PM, "Jim Wright" wrote:
>
> On Aug 16, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Simon Brereton wrote:
>
> > mail #554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Host not
found ##
> >
>
> > If I added in a check_helo_access before reject_invalid_helo_name that
would w
* Simon Brereton :
> Hi
>
> I have a line like this in my logs:
> mail #554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Host not found ##
~$ host SPEXCH07.sp.com
Host SPEXCH07.sp.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> This is clearly because I have reject_invalid_helo_name in my main.cf
Yes.
>
Hi
I have a line like this in my logs:
mail #554 5.7.1 : Helo command rejected: Host not found ##
This is clearly because I have reject_invalid_helo_name in my main.cf
Unfortunately, the fools at steelpartners.com have decided it's quite
okay to helo with sp.com (which actually resolv
Jim Wright:
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> > Mail from yahoo.com is now rejected with:
> >
> > Aug 28 16:24:05 mgate2 postfix/smtpd[53002]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> > from web34202.mail.mud.yahoo.com[66.163.178.117]: 554 5.7.1
> > :
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
Mail from yahoo.com is now rejected with:
Aug 28 16:24:05 mgate2 postfix/smtpd[53002]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from web34202.mail.mud.yahoo.com[66.163.178.117]: 554 5.7.1
: Helo command rejected: Malformed DNS
server reply; from= to= proto
Wietse Venema:
> Ralf Hildebrandt:
> > * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > > Which Postfix restriction generates: "Helo command rejected: Domain not
> > > found"?
> > >
> > > From the log on albatross.python.org:
> > >
> > >
Ralf Hildebrandt:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
> > Which Postfix restriction generates: "Helo command rejected: Domain not
> > found"?
> >
> > From the log on albatross.python.org:
> >
> > Aug 21
On 8/28/2009 5:29 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt:
* Ralf Hildebrandt:
BTW, this log entry in itself proves that the DNS name must resolved
back and forth, because otherwise postfix would have logged
"unknown[76.96.30.96]" instead of
qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.3
rom yahoo.com is now rejected with:
Aug 28 16:24:05 mgate2 postfix/smtpd[53002]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT from web34202.mail.mud.yahoo.com[66.163.178.117]: 554
5.7.1 : Helo command rejected:
Malformed DNS server reply; from=
to= proto=SMTP helo=
If we look up the helo name, we see:
# host web3420
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> * Ralf Hildebrandt :
>
> > BTW, this log entry in itself proves that the DNS name must resolved
> > back and forth, because otherwise postfix would have logged
> > "unknown[76.96.30.96]" instead of
> > qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.30.96]
> > -- which was also
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> BTW, this log entry in itself proves that the DNS name must resolved
> back and forth, because otherwise postfix would have logged
> "unknown[76.96.30.96]" instead of
> qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.30.96]
> -- which was also the HELO hostname!
mail_version =
* Ralf Hildebrandt :
> Which Postfix restriction generates: "Helo command rejected: Domain not
> found"?
>
> From the log on albatross.python.org:
>
> Aug 21 15:07:07 albatross postfix/smtpd[15378]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT
> from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mai
Which Postfix restriction generates: "Helo command rejected: Domain not found"?
>From the log on albatross.python.org:
Aug 21 15:07:07 albatross postfix/smtpd[15378]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT
from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net[76.96.30.96]: 554 5.0.0
: Helo com
41 matches
Mail list logo
