lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603780 . My mail
> client is The Bat and even with this message in the logs it seems
> to work.
If the biopair message does not break mail, then ignore it. Postfix can't
prevent the client from closing the session.
Hi,
this is still an open issue.
> Ah, and another thing. I see the following in the logs:
> Dec 12 16:38:39 hostname postfix/smtpd[1374]: warning:
> network_biopair_interop: error reading 5 bytes from the network: Connection
> reset by peer
>
> I already googled and found some hints but none
Hi Wietse,
we don't need to check fallback_relay anymore.
As I found out, uucp transport will be turned off in near future on my backup
smarthost site.
I thank you for your help!
-lutzn
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://f
lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
> Hi,
>
> I have a working setup of postfix that sends all mail not for me
> to a relayhost via smtp. I want to use a fallback_relay to send
> mail via uucp. Ok, I know that does not work out of the box. So
> I set up another instance listening on port 10027 on 127.0.0.1.
Ruppert G. von Teutul:
> > > If I send a mail to someone at live.com it does not pass to the
> > > fallback_relay if relayhost is down. In theory this should only
> > > happen if my machine announces itself as MX for live.com. Correct?
> >
> > Oops, I wrote that code long enough that my memory i
> > If I send a mail to someone at live.com it does not pass to the
> > fallback_relay if relayhost is down. In theory this should only
> > happen if my machine announces itself as MX for live.com. Correct?
>
> Oops, I wrote that code long enough that my memory is incorrect.
>
> Try putting t
lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
>
> >
> > Why does Postfix believe that it is MX for those domains? If
> > it didn't, then it would use the smtp_fallback_relay.
>
> I have no clue!
>
> If I send a mail to someone at live.com it does not pass to the
> fallback_relay if relayhost is down. In theory this
Wietse Venema:
> Ruppert G. von Teutul:
> >
> > > > The machine we are talking about is MX for all the domains that
> > > > belong to me (=mydestination). And exactly the way relayhost is
> > > > sent mails to the world they should be sent to the fallback_relay
> > > > if that relayhost is down.
>
> Why does Postfix believe that it is MX for those domains? If
> it didn't, then it would use the smtp_fallback_relay.
I have no clue!
If I send a mail to someone at live.com it does not pass to the fallback_relay
if relayhost is down. In theory this should only happen if my machine
annou
Ruppert G. von Teutul:
>
> > > The machine we are talking about is MX for all the domains that
> > > belong to me (=mydestination). And exactly the way relayhost is
> > > sent mails to the world they should be sent to the fallback_relay
> > > if that relayhost is down.
> >
> > Why are you MX hos
> > The machine we are talking about is MX for all the domains that
> > belong to me (=mydestination). And exactly the way relayhost is
> > sent mails to the world they should be sent to the fallback_relay
> > if that relayhost is down.
>
> Why are you MX host for a domain, and then sending its
Wietse Venema:
> > The machine we are talking about is MX for all the domains that
> > belong to me (=mydestination). And exactly the way relayhost is
> > sent mails to the world they should be sent to the fallback_relay
> > if that relayhost is down.
>
> Why are you MX host for a domain, and the
lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
> > lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
> > > The mails going to the uucp transport are going into the world.
> >
> > Wietse:
> > You are sending mail to some other host, and want Postfix to use
> > the smtp_fallback_feature when that host is down.
> >
> > Why does Postfix believe that
> lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
> > The mails going to the uucp transport are going into the world.
>
> Wietse:
> You are sending mail to some other host, and want Postfix to use
> the smtp_fallback_feature when that host is down.
>
> Why does Postfix believe that it is MX host for the destination?
> So
Wietse:
>To prevent mailer loops between MX hosts and fall-back hosts, Postfix
>version 2.2 and later will not use the fallback relays for destinations
>that it is MX host for (assuming DNS lookup is turned on).
I made that change because mail would loop between the fallbax
and the M
there any tricks how I can do that?
-lutzn
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:36:10 -0500 (EST)
> Von: Wietse Venema
> An: Postfix users
> Betreff: Re: fallback_relay not triggered
> lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
> > Dec 12 16:38:38 mhost postfix/sm
lutz.niede...@gmx.net:
> Dec 12 16:38:38 mhost postfix/smtp[1378]: 4278AB425ED: to=,
> relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.03/0/0.02/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred
> (connect to mail.relay.de[192.10.64.2]: Connection refused)
>
> And then the message sits in the queue. It won't be delivered via my
Hi,
I have a working setup of postfix that sends all mail not for me to a relayhost
via smtp. I want to use a fallback_relay to send mail via uucp. Ok, I know
that does not work out of the box. So I set up another instance listening on
port 10027 on 127.0.0.1. This sends mail via uucp. I c
18 matches
Mail list logo
